Cited by 6Epilepsy research and treatmentAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorNeural dynamics and brain function

Introducing Songbirds as a Model System for Epilepsy Research

Margoliash, Daniel, van Drongelen, Wim, Kohrman, Michael·2010·Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

It has been broadly recognized that the avian forebrain shares extensive homology with neocortex, and the two share similar patterns of input, local circuit, and output connectivity. Some songbird species also exhibit a full range of vigilance states and ultradian patterns in gross (EEG) potentials that are commonly seen in mammals. The avian forebrain is organized in a field and nuclear fashion, giving great technical advantage especially when manipulating specialized regions such as forebrain song system nuclei associated with vocal learning that would be hard to achieve in cortex. Songbirds are a model system for studying developmental processes at multiple levels of analysis, including but not limited to mechanistic electrophysiological descriptions of vocal production and vocal learning process. Recent behavioral evidence establishes a role for sleep in the vocal learning process of birds. This is likely to be related to the observed neuronal replay during sleep in songbirds and its emergence at the onset of exposure to a song tutor and formation of an auditory memory. These features of birdsong learning and the song system position it as an attractive model system for systems-level epilepsy research, especially for pediatric epilepsies and for those that are expressed during sleep and affect language development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wnp.0b013e3181fe06f6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings suggested a model where RA burst activity during sleep and forming of sensorimotor song representations requires twofold waking inputs: auditory feedback from actual singing and activity related to the sensory template of the tutor song.

    “The findings suggested a model where RA burst activity during sleep and the forming of sensorimotor representations of a song requires a twofold of inputs during waking, i.e., on the one hand, auditory feedback activity from actual singing during waking that serves a permissive role in structuring night-time RA bursting and organizing the song representation and on the other hand activity related”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [775]

  • The model proposed by Margoliash and co-workers may also account for song learning and maintenance of learned songs in adult songbirds.

    “Although this model as proposed by Margoliash and co-workers (774, 775) aims to explain developmental song learning, it may account also for song learning and the maintenance of learned songs in adult songbirds.”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [775]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • About Sleep's Role in Memory

    Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2012 · Cited by 2,783 · see citing works

    “singing during waking that serves a permissive role in structuring night-time RA bursting and organizing the song representation and on the other hand activity related to the sensory template of the tutor song (774, 775).”
    BackgroundMethod

Authors
Margoliash, D., van Drongelen, W., & Kohrman, M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Margoliash, Daniel
Venue
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Published
2010-12
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
433-437
ISSN
0736-0258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319346802
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH59831, R01MH059831)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC007206, DC 007206)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
songbirds, epilepsy research, avian forebrain, vocal learning, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, pediatric epilepsy, language development, ultradian rhythms
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Learning, Sleep, Vocalization, Animal, Prosencephalon, Songbirds, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review