Introducing Songbirds as a Model System for Epilepsy Research
Abstract
It has been broadly recognized that the avian forebrain shares extensive homology with neocortex, and the two share similar patterns of input, local circuit, and output connectivity. Some songbird species also exhibit a full range of vigilance states and ultradian patterns in gross (EEG) potentials that are commonly seen in mammals. The avian forebrain is organized in a field and nuclear fashion, giving great technical advantage especially when manipulating specialized regions such as forebrain song system nuclei associated with vocal learning that would be hard to achieve in cortex. Songbirds are a model system for studying developmental processes at multiple levels of analysis, including but not limited to mechanistic electrophysiological descriptions of vocal production and vocal learning process. Recent behavioral evidence establishes a role for sleep in the vocal learning process of birds. This is likely to be related to the observed neuronal replay during sleep in songbirds and its emergence at the onset of exposure to a song tutor and formation of an auditory memory. These features of birdsong learning and the song system position it as an attractive model system for systems-level epilepsy research, especially for pediatric epilepsies and for those that are expressed during sleep and affect language development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings suggested a model where RA burst activity during sleep and forming of sensorimotor song representations requires twofold waking inputs: auditory feedback from actual singing and activity related to the sensory template of the tutor song.
“The findings suggested a model where RA burst activity during sleep and the forming of sensorimotor representations of a song requires a twofold of inputs during waking, i.e., on the one hand, auditory feedback activity from actual singing during waking that serves a permissive role in structuring night-time RA bursting and organizing the song representation and on the other hand activity related”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [775]
The model proposed by Margoliash and co-workers may also account for song learning and maintenance of learned songs in adult songbirds.
“Although this model as proposed by Margoliash and co-workers (774, 775) aims to explain developmental song learning, it may account also for song learning and the maintenance of learned songs in adult songbirds.”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [775]
Cites
Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei
Reiner, A., Perkel, D. J., Bruce, L. L., Butler, A. B., Csillag, A., Kuenzel, W., Medina, L., Paxinos, G., Shimizu, T., Striedter, G., et al. (2004) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20118 · Cited by 1,148 · see citing works
Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning
Dave, A. S., & Margoliash, D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5492.812 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Self-citationSleep and sensorimotor integration during early vocal learning in a songbird
Shank, S. S., & Margoliash, D. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07615 · Cited by 178 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This was observed starting the night after exposure to tutor songs, even though the objective changes in singing behavior (the ultradian pattern of singing described above) did not emerge until the following morning (Shank and Margoliash, 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRauske, P. L., Chi, Z., Dave, A. S., & Margoliash, D. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3112-09.2010 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2012 · Cited by 2,783 · see citing works
“singing during waking that serves a permissive role in structuring night-time RA bursting and organizing the song representation and on the other hand activity related to the sensory template of the tutor song (774, 775).”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Margoliash, D., van Drongelen, W., & Kohrman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Margoliash, Daniel
- ORCID
- Margoliash, Daniel
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 433-437
- ISSN
- 0736-0258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2319346802
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH59831, R01MH059831)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC007206, DC 007206)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- songbirds, epilepsy research, avian forebrain, vocal learning, sleep-dependent memory consolidation, pediatric epilepsy, language development, ultradian rhythms
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Learning, Sleep, Vocalization, Animal, Prosencephalon, Songbirds, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review