Cited by 101Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement DisordersPain Management and TreatmentTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep brain stimulation for chronic pain investigated with magnetoencephalography

Open access

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation has shown remarkable potential in alleviating otherwise treatment-resistant chronic pain, but little is currently known about the underlying neural mechanisms. Here for the first time, we used noninvasive neuroimaging by magnetoencephalography to map changes in neural activity induced by deep brain stimulation in a patient with severe phantom limb pain. When the stimulator was turned off, the patient reported significant increases in subjective pain. Corresponding significant changes in neural activity were found in a network including the mid-anterior orbitofrontal and subgenual cingulate cortices; these areas are known to be involved in pain relief. Hence, they could potentially serve as future surgical targets to relieve chronic pain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wnr.0b013e328010dc3d

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 101

Metadata

Authors
Kringelbach, M. L., Jenkinson, N., Green, A. L., Owen, S. L. F., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L., Holliday, I. E., Stein, J., & Aziz, T. Z.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Kringelbach, Morten L.
  • Aziz, Tipu Z.
Venue
NeuroReport
Published
2007-02-12
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
223-228
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964099314
Cited by
101
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
deep brain stimulation, chronic pain, phantom limb pain, magnetoencephalography, orbitofrontal cortex, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, treatment-resistant pain, surgical targets
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Chronic Disease, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Pain, Intractable, Intractable Pain, Phantom Limb, Predictive Value of Tests, Magnetoencephalography, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Deep Brain Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review