Cited by 60Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisVisual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and Perception

Implied motion because of instability in Hokusai Manga activates the human motion-sensitive extrastriate visual cortex: an fMRI study of the impact of visual art

Osaka, Naoyuki, Matsuyoshi, Daisuke, Ikeda, Takashi, Osaka, Mariko·2010·NeuroReport

Abstract

The recent development of cognitive neuroscience has invited inference about the neurosensory events underlying the experience of visual arts involving implied motion. We report functional magnetic resonance imaging study demonstrating activation of the human extrastriate motion-sensitive cortex by static images showing implied motion because of instability. We used static line-drawing cartoons of humans by Hokusai Katsushika (called 'Hokusai Manga'), an outstanding Japanese cartoonist as well as famous Ukiyoe artist. We found 'Hokusai Manga' with implied motion by depicting human bodies that are engaged in challenging tonic posture significantly activated the motion-sensitive visual cortex including MT+ in the human extrastriate cortex, while an illustration that does not imply motion, for either humans or objects, did not activate these areas under the same tasks. We conclude that motion-sensitive extrastriate cortex would be a critical region for perception of implied motion in instability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wnr.0b013e328335b371

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have shown a similar pattern of brain activation for less densely descriptive and more abstract images.

    “Recent studies have shown a similar pattern of brain activation in the case of less densely descriptive and more abstract images (Kim and Blake, 2007; Osaka et al., 2010)”

    From Corticomotor Excitability during Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art (2011) · cites this paper as Osaka et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osaka, N., Matsuyoshi, D., Ikeda, T., & Osaka, M.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Osaka, Naoyuki
  • Osaka, Mariko
Venue
NeuroReport
Published
2010-03-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
264-267
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061851474
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
implied motion, visual arts, extrastriate cortex, MT, ukiyo-e
MeSH terms
Cartoons as Topic, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review