Cited by 108Action Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and PerceptionAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Observation of Static Pictures of Dynamic Actions Enhances the Activity of Movement-Related Brain Areas

Open access
Proverbio, Alice Mado, Riva, Federica, Zani, Alberto·2009·PLoS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physiological studies of perfectly still observers have shown interesting correlations between increasing effortfulness of observed actions and increases in heart and respiration rates. Not much is known about the cortical response induced by observing effortful actions. The aim of this study was to investigate the time course and neural correlates of perception of implied motion, by presenting 260 pictures of human actions differing in degrees of dynamism and muscular exertion. ERPs were recorded from 128 sites in young male and female adults engaged in a secondary perceptual task. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Our results indicate that even when the stimulus shows no explicit motion, observation of static photographs of human actions with implied motion produces a clear increase in cortical activation, manifest in a long-lasting positivity (LP) between 350-600 ms that is much greater to dynamic than less dynamic actions, especially in men. A swLORETA linear inverse solution computed on the dynamic-minus-static difference wave in the time window 380-430 ms showed that a series of regions was activated, including the right V5/MT, left EBA, left STS (BA38), left premotor (BA6) and motor (BA4) areas, cingulate and IF cortex. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: Overall, the data suggest that corresponding mirror neurons respond more strongly to implied dynamic than to less dynamic actions. The sex difference might be partially cultural and reflect a preference of young adult males for highly dynamic actions depicting intense muscular activity, or a sporty context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0005389

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, complex visual stimuli, including actions, reach premotor cortex and motor areas in around 300 ms.

    “complex visual stimuli, including actions, reach PMC and motor areas in around 300ms”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Proverbio, Riva, & Zani, 2009

    The Results (page unavailable) identify premotor and motor activity during viewing of static photographs depicting actions, but locate it in the 380–430 ms window, not around 300 ms. The study does not establish that complex visual stimuli generally reach those areas at that time. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Static images with implied motion activate both motor and visual areas.

    “It has been demonstrated (by using both TMS and event related potentials) that static images with implied motion perception activate both motor and visual areas (Urgesi et al., 2006; Proverbio et al., 2009).”

    From Corticomotor Excitability during Observation and Imagination of a Work of Art (2011) · cites this paper as Proverbio et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Decety J Perani D Jeannerod M Bettinardi V Tadary B 1994 Mapping motor representations with PET. Nature 600 602 7935791

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proverbio, A. M., Riva, F., & Zani, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
  • Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IT)
Corresponding author
Proverbio, Alice Mado
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2009-05-06
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
e5389
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146356260
Cited by
108
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
implied motion, mirror neurons, event-related potentials, sex differences, MT/V5, premotor cortex, STS, cingulate cortex, muscular exertion
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Male, Motion Perception, Movement, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Observation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review