The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of eating disorders in Europe: prevalence, incidence, comorbidity, course, consequences, and risk factors
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Eating disorders - anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder - affect numerous Europeans. This narrative review summarizes European studies on their prevalence, incidence, comorbidity, course, consequences, and risk factors published in 2015 and the first half of 2016. RECENT FINDINGS: Anorexia nervosa is reported by <1-4%, bulimia nervosa <1-2%, binge eating disorder <1-4%, and subthreshold eating disorders by 2-3% of women in Europe. Of men, 0.3-0.7% report eating disorders. Incidences of anorexia appear stable, whereas bulimia may be declining. Although the numbers of individuals receiving treatment have increased, only about one-third is detected by healthcare. Over 70% of individuals with eating disorders report comorbid disorders: anxiety disorders (>50%), mood disorders (>40%), self-harm (>20%), and substance use (>10%) are common. The long-term course of anorexia nervosa is favorable for most, but a substantial minority of eating disorder patients experience longstanding symptoms and somatic problems. The risk of suicide is elevated. Parental psychiatric disorders, prenatal maternal stress, various family factors, childhood overweight, and body dissatisfaction in adolescence increase the risk of eating disorders. SUMMARY: Eating disorders are relatively common disorders that are often overlooked, although they are associated with high comorbidity and serious health consequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ulfvebrand, S., Birgegård, A., Norring, C., Högdahl, L., & von Hausswolff-Juhlin, Y. (2015) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.09.008 · Cited by 352
The BELLA study group, Herpertz-Dahlmann, B., Dempfle, A., Konrad, K., Klasen, F., & Ravens-Sieberer, U. (2015) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-014-0610-3 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Initiative, A. N. G., Watson, H. J., Eating Disorders Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Yilmaz, Z., Thornton, L. M., Hübel, C., Coleman, J. R. I., Gaspar, H. A., Bryois, J., Hinney, A., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0439-2 · Cited by 1,109
Self-citationQian, J., Wu, Y., Liu, F., Zhu, Y., Jin, H., Zhang, H., Wan, Y., Li, C., & Yu, D. (2022) · Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity · doi:10.1007/s40519-021-01162-z · Cited by 431
Evidence-based clinical guidelines for eating disorders: international comparison
Hilbert, A., Hoek, H. W., & Schmidt, R. (2017) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/yco.0000000000000360 · Cited by 373
Molendijk, M. L., Hoek, H. W., Brewerton, T. D., & Elzinga, B. M. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291716003561 · Cited by 360
Castelpietra, G., Knudsen, A. K. S., Agardh, E. E., Armocida, B., Beghi, M., Iburg, K. M., Logroscino, G., Ma, R., Starace, F., Steel, N., et al. (2022) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100341 · Cited by 347
Metadata
- Authors
- Keski-Rahkonen, A., & Mustelin, L.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Psychiatry
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 340-345
- ISSN
- 0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2521672452
- Cited by
- 820
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.