The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metacognitive training in schizophrenia: from basic research to knowledge translation and intervention.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been a marked increase in the study of cognitive biases in schizophrenia, which has in part been stimulated by encouraging results with cognitive-behavioral interventions in the disorder. We summarize new evidence on cognitive biases thought to trigger or maintain positive symptoms in schizophrenia and present a new therapeutic intervention. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies indicate that patients with paranoid schizophrenia jump to conclusions, show attributional biases, share a bias against disconfirmatory evidence, are overconfident in errors, and display problems with theory of mind. Many of these biases precede the psychotic episode and may represent cognitive traits. Building upon this literature, we developed a metacognitive training program that aims to convey scientific knowledge on cognitive biases to patients and provides corrective experiences in an engaging and supportive manner. Two new studies provide preliminary evidence for the feasibility and efficacy of this approach. SUMMARY: The gap between our advanced understanding of cognitive processes in schizophrenia and its application in clinical treatment is increasingly being narrowed. Despite emerging evidence for the feasibility and efficacy of metacognitive training as a stand-alone program, its most powerful application may be in combination with individual cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Three (17%) utilised Meta Cognitive Therapy (MCT; Moritz & Woodward, 2007)”
From A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive behavioural informed psychological interventions for psychiatric inpatients with psychosis (2020) · cites this paper as Moritz & Woodward, 2007
In the citing paper
“MCT on the other hand aims to promote patients’ cognitive flexibility by raising metacognitive awareness and knowledge for cognitive biases (21) and showed significant effects on reducing positive symptoms (8, 22, 23).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“MCT’s goals are implemented in a group therapy format that works with non-confrontational, educative and delusional-neutral material (21).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“As suggested by Moritz and Woodward (21), MEBASp operates through a non-confrontational and symptom-neutral “backdoor” approach (p. 623) that could be beneficial to address a transdiagnostic spectrum of patients and diverse needs, foster rapid alliance building, motivate resistant patients, lower drop-out rates, and enhance recovery rather than illness elimination (6, 16, 19, 145).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“The therapists’ process-oriented stance, which sees psychotic symptoms as extreme manifestations of normal human cognitive distortions and dysfunctional strategies, can thereby foster rapid alliance building (21).”
From Developing a mechanism-based therapy for acute psychiatric inpatients with psychotic symptoms: an Intervention Mapping approach (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.
Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.103.4.650 · Cited by 3,504
Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence.
Heinrichs, R. W., & Zakzanis, K. K. (1998) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.426 · Cited by 2,798
PERSECUTORY DELUSIONS: A REVIEW AND THEORETICAL INTEGRATION
Bentall, R. P., Corcoran, R., Howard, R. J., Blackwood, N., & Kinderman, P. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00106-4 · Cited by 876
Suspicious minds: The psychology of persecutory delusions
Freeman, D. (2007) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.10.004 · Cited by 814
Cognitive approaches to delusions: a critical review of theories and evidence.
Garety, P. A., & Freeman, D. (1999) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466599162700 · Cited by 794
Stress-reactivity in psychosis: Evidence for an affective pathway to psychosis
Myin-Germeys, I., & van Os, J. (2007) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.005 · Cited by 719
(2001) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00085-1 · Cited by 590
Jumping to conclusions in delusional and non‐delusional schizophrenic patients
Moritz, S., & Woodward, T. S. (2005) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466505x35678 · Cited by 372
Danion, J., Rizzo, L., & Bruant, A. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.639 · Cited by 317
Tarrier, N., & Wykes, T. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.020 · Cited by 312
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Moritz, 2004, Plausibility judgment in schizophrenic patients: evidence for a liberal acceptance bias, German J Psychiatry, 7, 66
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Persons With and Without a Need for Care
Johns, L. C., Kompus, K., Connell, M., Humpston, C., Lincoln, T. M., Longden, E., Preti, A., Alderson-Day, B., Badcock, J. C., Cella, M., et al. (2014) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu005 · Cited by 311
Bentall, R. P., Rowse, G., Shryane, N., Kinderman, P., Howard, R., Blackwood, N., Moore, R., & Corcoran, R. (2009) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.1 · Cited by 295
Metacognitive Capacities for Reflection in Schizophrenia: Implications for Developing Treatments
Lysaker, P. H., & Dimaggio, G. (2014) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu038 · Cited by 244
Montag, C., Dziobek, I., Richter, I. S., Neuhaus, K., Lehmann, A. I., Sylla, R., Heekeren, H. R., Heinz, A., & Gallinat, J. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.006 · Cited by 262
van der Gaag, M., Nieman, D. H., Rietdijk, J., Dragt, S., Ising, H. K., Klaassen, R. M. C., Koeter, M., Cuijpers, P., Wunderink, L., & Linszen, D. H. (2012) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbs105 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Moritz, S., & Woodward, T. S.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Moritz, Steffen
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Psychiatry
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 619-625
- ISSN
- 0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966491990
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- metacognitive training, schizophrenia, cognitive biases, paranoid schizophrenia, cognitive behavioral therapy, attribution bias, theory of mind, positive symptoms, knowledge translation, cognitive characteristics
- MeSH terms
- Delusions, Humans, Memory, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
