Cited by 91Treatment of Major DepressionSleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatonin

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparison of agomelatine and escitalopram on nighttime sleep and daytime condition and efficacy in major depressive disorder patients

Quera-Salva, Maria-Antonia, Hajak, Goeran, Philip, Pierre, Montplaisir, Jaques, Keufer-Le Gall, Sophie, Laredo, Judith, Guilleminault, Christian·2011·International Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Agomelatine, an MT1/MT2 receptor agonist and 5-HT2C receptor antagonist antidepressant, is known to have beneficial effects on subjective sleep in major depressive disorder patients. This international multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the effects of agomelatine (25-50 mg/day) and escitalopram (10-20 mg/day) on sleep polysomnographic parameters in major depressive disorder patients treated up to 24 weeks. A total of 138 outpatients were randomly allocated to agomelatine (n=71) or escitalopram (n=67). Treatment with agomelatine was associated with a reduction in sleep latency from week 2 onward. The difference between treatments was significant on all evaluations. Rapid eye movement latency was increased with escitalopram compared with agomelatine, with significant between-group differences at every visit. Agomelatine preserved the number of sleep cycles, whereas it was decreased with escitalopram with significant between-group differences at every visit. Assessments on visual analogue scales indicated that treatment with agomelatine improved morning condition, and reduced daytime sleepiness compared with escitalopram.17-item Hamilton depression rating scale total score was reduced in both groups, agomelatine was statistically noninferior to escitalopram at 6 weeks. Both treatments were well tolerated. This study showed that the clinical effects of agomelatine on sleep and wake parameters are different from that of escitalopram.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yic.0b013e328349b117

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the second week, agomelatine slightly improves sleep continuity, with increased total sleep time and sleep efficiency.

    “In the second week, agomelatine slightly improves sleep continuity (increased total sleep time and sleep efficiency) and escitalopram worsens it [25].”

    From Effects of Antidepressants on Sleep (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Compared with escitalopram, agomelatine improves sleep latency after short (2 weeks) and long (24 weeks) treatment.

    “In comparison to escitalopram, agomelatine is knowntoimprove sleep latency after both short (after 2 weeks) and long (after 24 weeks) treatment.”

    From Effects of Antidepressants on Sleep (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

  • In the second week, escitalopram worsens sleep continuity.

    “In the second week, agomelatine slightly improves sleep continuity (increased total sleep time and sleep efficiency) and escitalopram worsens it [25].”

    From Effects of Antidepressants on Sleep (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

  • Agomelatine and escitalopram differ significantly in their effect on sleep continuity.

    “Moreover, both drugs differ significantly in their effect on sleep continuity.”

    From Effects of Antidepressants on Sleep (2017) · cites this paper as [25]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Quera-Salva, M.-A., Hajak, G., Philip, P., Montplaisir, J., Keufer-Le Gall, S., Laredo, J., & Guilleminault, C.
Affiliations
  • Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Canada Research Chairs (CA)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Quera-Salva, Maria-Antonia
Venue
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2011-09
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
252-262
ISSN
0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046271238
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
agomelatine, escitalopram, major depressive disorder, sleep, sleep latency, REM latency, sleep cycles, daytime sleepiness, 5-HT2C receptor antagonist, antidepressant efficacy, non-inferiority
MeSH terms
Acetamides, Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Melatonin, Middle Aged, Naphthalenes, Sleep Stages, Wakefulness, Citalopram, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review