Cited by 94Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSleep and related disorders

Efficacy of agomelatine and escitalopram on depression, subjective sleep and emotional experiences in patients with major depressive disorder: a 24-wk randomized, controlled, double-blind trial

Open access
Corruble, Emmanuelle, de Bodinat, Christian, Belaïdi, Carole, Goodwin, Guy M.·2013·International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

In the present randomized, controlled, double-blind trial (12 wk treatment plus double-blind extension for 12 wk), 25–50 mg/d agomelatine (n = 164) and 10–20 mg/d escitalopram (n = 160) were compared for short- and long-term efficacy, subjective sleep and tolerability. The effects of these drugs on emotional experiences were also compared in patients having completed the Oxford Questionnaire on the Emotional Side-Effects of Antidepressants (agomelatine: n = 25; escitalopram: n = 20). Agomelatine and escitalopram similarly improved depressive symptoms, with clinically relevant score changes over 12 and 24 wk and notable percentage of remitters (week 12: 60.9 and 54.4%; week 24: 69.6 and 63.1% respectively). Over the 12 and 24-wk treatment periods, the ‘global satisfaction on sleep’ scores increased in both treatment groups and did not differ between groups. Satisfaction with sleep–wake quality was high in both groups; the ‘wellness feeling on waking’ was more improved with agomelatine than with escitalopram (p = 0.02). In patients with pronounced sleep complaints, quality of sleep and feeling on waking were significantly more improved with agomelatine than with escitalopram (p = 0.016 and p = 0.009, respectively). Emotional blunting was less frequent on agomelatine than on escitalopram. Indeed, 28% of patients on agomelatine vs. 60% on escitalopram felt that their emotions lacked intensity and 16% of patients on agomelatine vs. 53% on escitalopram felt that things that they cared about before illness did not seem important any more (p = 0.024). The tolerability profile of agomelatine was found to be superior to that of escitalopram and the incidence of patients with at least one emergent adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation was lower in the agomelatine group than in the escitalopram group (5.5 vs. 10.6%). The findings suggest that agomelatine displays additional long-term clinical benefits on sleep–wake quality and emotional experiences over escitalopram in the management of depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1461145713000679

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corruble, E., de Bodinat, C., Belaïdi, C., & Goodwin, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), Suresnes Cedex, France
  • Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (France) (FR)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Corruble, Emmanuelle
Venue
International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2013-11-01
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
2219-2234
ISSN
  • 1461-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5111
OpenAlex
W2161185297
Cited by
94
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Eisai
  • Servier
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
agomelatine, escitalopram, major depressive disorder, antidepressant efficacy, subjective sleep, emotional blunting, tolerability, treatment discontinuation, sleep quality, remission, melatonin receptor agonists, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, adverse events
MeSH terms
Acetamides, Adult, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Middle Aged, Naphthalenes, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Time Factors, Wakefulness, Citalopram, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review