Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species
Open accessAbstract
With millions of species and their life-stage transformations, the animal kingdom provides a challenging target for taxonomy. Recent work has suggested that a DNA-based identification system, founded on the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI), can aid the resolution of this diversity. While past work has validated the ability of COI sequences to diagnose species in certain taxonomic groups, the present study extends these analyses across the animal kingdom. The results indicate that sequence divergences at COI regularly enable the discrimination of closely allied species in all animal phyla except the Cnidaria. This success in species diagnosis reflects both the high rates of sequence change at COI in most animal groups and constraints on intraspecific mitochondrial DNA divergence arising, at least in part, through selective sweeps mediated via interactions with the nuclear genome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BSF strains have divergences of 4.3%-4.9%.
“BSF strains have divergences of 4.3%-4.9% (Ståhls et al. 2020), which far exceeds the standard 2%-3% for a 'barcode gap' (Hebert et al. 2003).”
From Beyond the Black Box: Reproductive Strategies of the Black Soldier Fly as a Model for Bridging Evolutionary Biology and Applied Entomology (2026) · cites this paper as Hebert et al. 2003
DNA barcoding allows for standardized and accurate species identification.
“DNA barcoding allows for standardized and accurate species identification [15–18].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 4,466
- Authors
- Hebert, P. D. N., Ratnasingham, S., & de Waard, J. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
- Corresponding author
- Hebert, Paul D.N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2003-08-07
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- S96-9
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC1698023
- OpenAlex
- W2085525886
- Cited by
- 4,466
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 140 · 2025: 211 · 2024: 246 · 2023: 251 · 2022: 227 · 2021: 321 · 2020: 298 · 2019: 201 · 2018: 275 · 2017: 253 · 2016: 249 · 2015: 267 · 2014: 243 · 2013: 234 · 2012: 229
- FWCI
- 49.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, COI, DNA barcoding, species delimitation, closely related species, mitochondrial DNA divergence, intraspecific divergence, selective sweeps, nuclear-mitochondrial interactions, animal classification, Cnidaria
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Electron Transport Complex IV, DNA, Mitochondrial, Sensitivity and Specificity, Species Specificity, Genetic Variation, Reproducibility of Results, Protein Subunits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review