Cited by 115Primate Behavior and EcologyRobotic Locomotion and ControlAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Orangutans use compliant branches to lower the energetic cost of locomotion

Open access
Thorpe, S.K.S, Crompton, R.H, Alexander, R.McN·2007·Biology Letters

Abstract

Within the forest canopy, the shortest gaps between tree crowns lie between slender terminal branches. While the compliance of these supports has previously been shown to increase the energetic cost of gap crossing in arboreal animals (e.g. Alexander 1991 Z. Morphol. Anthropol.78, 315–320; Demes et al. 1995 Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.96, 419–429), field observations suggest that some primates may be able to use support compliance to increase the energetic efficiency of locomotion. Here, we calculate the energetic cost of alternative methods of gap crossing in orangutans (Pongo abelii). Tree sway (in which orangutans oscillate a compliant tree trunk with increasing magnitude to bridge a gap) was found to be less than half as costly as jumping, and an order of magnitude less costly than descending the tree, walking to the vine and climbing it. Observations of wild orangutans suggest that they actually use support compliance in many aspects of their locomotor behaviour. This study seems to be the first to show that elastic compliance in arboreal supports can be used to reduce the energetic cost of gap crossing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0049

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observations in the wild support the hypothesis that ecological food constraints have had widespread repercussions on the physiology, behavior, and life history of orangutans.

    “Observations in the wild support the hypothesis that ecological food constraints have had widespread repercussions on the physiology, behavior, and life history of orangutans.”
  • In addition to their low rates of growth and reproduction, orangutans live solitary lifestyles, avoiding the increased foraging costs incurred in large groups, and use locomotor strategies that minimize the cost of travel through the canopy.

    “In addition to their low rates of growth and reproduction (8), orangutans live solitary lifestyles, avoiding the increased foraging costs incurred in large groups (8, 28), and use locomotor strategies that minimize the cost of travel through the canopy (29).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Alexander R.McN. 2nd edn. Blackwell; Oxford, UK: 1983. Animal mechanics. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cant J.G.H. Positional behaviour of arboreal primates and habitat compliance. In: Thierry B, Anderson T.R, Roeder J.J, Herrenschmidt N, editors. Current primatology. vol. 1. Ecology and evolution. Universite Louis Pasteu; Strasbourg, France: 1994. pp. 187–193. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thorpe, S. K. S., Crompton, R. H., & Alexander, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Thorpe, S.K.S
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2007-04-17
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
253-256
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2127054932
Cited by
115
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
orangutans, Pongo abelii, elastic compliance, gap crossing, arboreal locomotion, jumping, climbing, primate locomotion
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Elasticity, Energy Metabolism, Locomotion, Models, Biological, Pongo pygmaeus, Trees, Video Recording, Plant Stems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review