Cited by 203Evolution and Paleontology StudiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

Links between global taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity and the expansion of vertebrates on land

Open access
Sahney, Sarda, Benton, Michael J., Ferry, Paul A.·2010·Biology Letters

Abstract

Tetrapod biodiversity today is great; over the past 400 Myr since vertebrates moved onto land, global tetrapod diversity has risen exponentially, punctuated by losses during major extinctions. There are links between the total global diversity of tetrapods and the diversity of their ecological roles, yet no one fully understands the interplay of these two aspects of biodiversity and a numerical analysis of this relationship has not so far been undertaken. Here we show that the global taxonomic and ecological diversity of tetrapods are closely linked. Throughout geological time, patterns of global diversity of tetrapod families show 97 per cent correlation with ecological modes. Global taxonomic and ecological diversity of this group correlates closely with the dominant classes of tetrapods (amphibians in the Palaeozoic, reptiles in the Mesozoic, birds and mammals in the Cenozoic). These groups have driven ecological diversity by expansion and contraction of occupied ecospace, rather than by direct competition within existing ecospace and each group has used ecospace at a greater rate than their predecessors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2009.1024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ecomorphological diversity is considered the main driver of species diversity, and diet is considered as one of the most important components of an animal's niche.

    “Ecomorphological diversity is considered the main driver of species diversity, and diet is considered as one of the most important components of an animal's niche [1].”

    From Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate (2021) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Results and Discussion link ecological diversity closely with tetrapod family diversity, and Methods includes diet among the variables defining ecological modes. But the Discussion identifies expansion into available ecospace—not ecomorphological diversity itself—as the main driver of tetrapod diversification. The paper does not rank diet as one of the most important components of an animal’s niche. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Benton, M. J. 1996 Testing the roles of competition and expansion in tetrapod evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263 , 641-646. (doi:10.1098 / rspb.1996.0096)
  2. Colbert, E. H. 1955 Evolution of the vertebrates . New York, NY: Wiley.
  3. Romer, A. S. 1966 Vertebrate paleontology . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Sepkoski, J. J. 1996 Competition in macroevolution: the double wedge revisited. In Evolutionary paleobiology (eds D. Jablonski, D. H. Erwin & J. H. Lipps), pp. 211-255. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahney, S., Benton, M. J., & Ferry, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Eikonworks, 805 3rd Street, Canmore, Alberta, Canada T1W 2J2
Corresponding author
Sahney, Sarda
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2010-01-27
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
544-547
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2164801744
Cited by
203
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/C518973/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
tetrapods, vertebrate diversification, taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, mass extinction, Cenozoic, Paleozoic, Mesozoic
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Animals, Paleontology, Phylogeny, Vertebrates, Ecosystem, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review