Cited by 84Genetic diversity and population structureVeterinary Oncology ResearchEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Low major histocompatibility complex diversity in the Tasmanian devil predates European settlement and may explain susceptibility to disease epidemics

Open access
Morris, Katrina, Austin, Jeremy J., Belov, Katherine·2013·Biology Letters

Abstract

The Tasmanian devil ( Sarcophilus harrisii ) is at risk of extinction owing to the emergence of a contagious cancer known as devil facial tumour disease (DFTD). The emergence and spread of DFTD has been linked to low genetic diversity in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). We examined MHC diversity in historical and ancient devils to determine whether loss of diversity is recent or predates European settlement in Australia. Our results reveal no additional diversity in historical Tasmanian samples. Mainland devils had common modern variants plus six new variants that are highly similar to existing alleles. We conclude that low MHC diversity has been a feature of devil populations since at least the Mid-Holocene and could explain their tumultuous history of population crashes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0900

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morris, K., Austin, J. J., & Belov, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Museums Victoria (AU)
Corresponding author
Belov, Katherine
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2013-02-23
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
20120900
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2154385432
Cited by
84
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Veterinary Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
Tasmanian devil, major histocompatibility complex, MHC diversity, devil facial tumour disease, contagious cancer, ancient DNA, population decline, disease susceptibility, extinction risk, Holocene
MeSH terms
Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Australia, Cloning, Molecular, Facial Neoplasms, Fossils, Genotype, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Marsupialia, Phylogeny, Time Factors, Genetic Variation, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Endangered Species

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review