Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Stepping in the direction of the fall: the next foot placement can be predicted from current upper body state in steady-state walking

Wang, Yang, Srinivasan, Manoj·2014·Biology Letters

Abstract

During human walking, perturbations to the upper body can be partly corrected by placing the foot appropriately on the next step. Here, we infer aspects of such foot placement dynamics using step-to-step variability over hundreds of steps of steady-state walking data. In particular, we infer dependence of the ‘next’ foot position on upper body state at different phases during the ‘current’ step. We show that a linear function of the hip position and velocity state (approximating the body center of mass state) during mid-stance explains over 80% of the next lateral foot position variance, consistent with (but not proving) lateral stabilization using foot placement. This linear function implies that a rightward pelvic deviation during a left stance results in a larger step width and smaller step length than average on the next foot placement. The absolute position on the treadmill does not add significant information about the next foot relative to current stance foot over that already available in the pelvis position and velocity. Such walking dynamics inference with steady-state data may allow diagnostics of stability and inform biomimetic exoskeleton or robot design.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0405

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bauby, 2000, Active control of lateral balance in human walking, J. Biomech., 33, 1433, 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00101-9 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Redfern, 1994, A model of foot placement during gait, J. Biomech., 27, 1339, 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90043-4 · DOI
  3. Hof, 2010, Balance responses to lateral perturbations in human treadmill walking, J. Exp. Biol., 213, 2655, 10.1242/jeb.042572 · DOI
  4. O'Connor, 2009, Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing, J. Neurophysiol., 102, 1411, 10.1152/jn.00131.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Hurmuzlu, 1994, On the measurement of dynamic stability of human locomotion, J. Biomech. Eng., 116, 30, 10.1115/1.2895701 · DOI
  6. Dingwell, 2001, Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking, J. Biomech. Eng., 123, 27, 10.1115/1.1336798 · DOI
  7. Revzen, 2012, Finding the dimension of slow dynamics in a rhythmic system, J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 957, 10.1098/rsif.2011.0431 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., & Srinivasan, M.
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2014-09-30
Volume
10
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 1744-9561
  • 1744-957X
Cited by
265
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review