The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The metabolic cost of changing walking speeds is significant, implies lower optimal speeds for shorter distances, and increases daily energy estimates
Abstract
Humans do not generally walk at constant speed, except perhaps on a treadmill. Normal walking involves starting, stopping and changing speeds, in addition to roughly steady locomotion. Here, we measure the metabolic energy cost of walking when changing speed. Subjects (healthy adults) walked with oscillating speeds on a constant-speed treadmill, alternating between walking slower and faster than the treadmill belt, moving back and forth in the laboratory frame. The metabolic rate for oscillating-speed walking was significantly higher than that for constant-speed walking (6–20% cost increase for ±0.13–0.27 m s −1 speed fluctuations). The metabolic rate increase was correlated with two models: a model based on kinetic energy fluctuations and an inverted pendulum walking model, optimized for oscillating-speed constraints. The cost of changing speeds may have behavioural implications: we predicted that the energy-optimal walking speed is lower for shorter distances. We measured preferred human walking speeds for different walking distances and found people preferred lower walking speeds for shorter distances as predicted. Further, analysing published daily walking-bout distributions, we estimate that the cost of changing speeds is 4–8% of daily walking energy budget.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Walking speed was controlled at approximately 1.25 m/s by following the experimenter, with gentle speed corrections to avoid costs for artificial speed fluctuations.
“Approximate speed of 1.25 m/s was controlled by following the experimenter, who walked according to GPS speed and attempted to make only gentle speed corrections, to avoid costs for artificial speed fluctuations [24].”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Variability in stride length and timing and fluctuations in speed have been reported to affect metabolic cost, perhaps due to the effort of varying gait.
“Variability in stride length and timing [37] and fluctuations in speed [24] have been reported to affect metabolic cost, perhaps due to the effort of varying gait.”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1682/JRRD.2007.11.0197 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/jappl.1960.15.6.1015 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.3141428 · DOI
- Minetti AE, 2001, Energetics and mechanics of human walking at oscillating speeds, Am. Zool, 41, 205
- Margaria R, 1976, Biomechanics and energetics of muscular exercise
- 10.1098/rsif.2009.0544 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.007 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.0000144685.88760.d7 · DOI
- 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ae5cfd · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2279 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2012 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kowalsky, D. B., Rebula, J. R., Ojeda, L. V., Adamczyk, P. G., & Kuo, A. D. (2021) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228682 · Cited by 106
Preferred walking speed on rough terrain: is it all about energetics?
Gast, K., Kram, R., & Riemer, R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.185447 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Seethapathi, N., & Srinivasan, M.
- Venue
- Biology Letters
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 20150486
- ISSN
- 1744-9561
- 1744-957X
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review