Cited by 80

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The metabolic cost of changing walking speeds is significant, implies lower optimal speeds for shorter distances, and increases daily energy estimates

Seethapathi, Nidhi, Srinivasan, Manoj·2015·Biology Letters

Abstract

Humans do not generally walk at constant speed, except perhaps on a treadmill. Normal walking involves starting, stopping and changing speeds, in addition to roughly steady locomotion. Here, we measure the metabolic energy cost of walking when changing speed. Subjects (healthy adults) walked with oscillating speeds on a constant-speed treadmill, alternating between walking slower and faster than the treadmill belt, moving back and forth in the laboratory frame. The metabolic rate for oscillating-speed walking was significantly higher than that for constant-speed walking (6–20% cost increase for ±0.13–0.27 m s −1 speed fluctuations). The metabolic rate increase was correlated with two models: a model based on kinetic energy fluctuations and an inverted pendulum walking model, optimized for oscillating-speed constraints. The cost of changing speeds may have behavioural implications: we predicted that the energy-optimal walking speed is lower for shorter distances. We measured preferred human walking speeds for different walking distances and found people preferred lower walking speeds for shorter distances as predicted. Further, analysing published daily walking-bout distributions, we estimate that the cost of changing speeds is 4–8% of daily walking energy budget.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0486

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1682/JRRD.2007.11.0197 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1152/jappl.1960.15.6.1015 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1063/1.3141428 · DOI
  4. Minetti AE, 2001, Energetics and mechanics of human walking at oscillating speeds, Am. Zool, 41, 205
  5. Margaria R, 1976, Biomechanics and energetics of muscular exercise
  6. 10.1098/rsif.2009.0544 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.02.007 · DOI
  8. 10.1161/01.STR.0000144685.88760.d7 · DOI
  9. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ae5cfd · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2279 · DOI
  11. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00959.2012 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seethapathi, N., & Srinivasan, M.
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2015-09
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
20150486
ISSN
  • 1744-9561
  • 1744-957X
Cited by
80
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review