Cited by 306Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionPhysical Activity and HealthLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

How humans walk: Bout duration, steps per bout, and rest duration

Orendurff, Michael S.·2008·The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Abstract

Much is known about human walking, but it is not known how walking is used during typical activities. Since improving walking ability is a key goal in many surgical, pharmacological, and physiotherapeutic interventions, understanding typical community mobility demands regarding the length of walking bouts, the number of sequential steps frequently performed, and the duration of common nonwalking (rest) behavior seems prudent. This study documents the gait of daily living in 10 nondisabled employed adults to define walking bout duration, sequential step counts, and length of rest periods over a 2-week period. Subjects wore a StepWatch Activity Monitor (OrthoCare Innovations; Mountlake Terrace, Washington) that counted steps in each 10-second time window. Custom code summed sequential steps, periods of walking behavior (bouts), and periods without steps (rest). Sixty percent of all walking bouts lasted just 30 seconds or less; a 2-minute walking bout was just 1 percent of total walking bouts. Forty percent of all walking bouts were less than 12 steps in a row, and 75 percent of all walking bouts were less than 40 steps in a row. Rest periods were predominantly very short, with half of all rests periods lasting 20 seconds or less. The community mobility demand for nondisabled employed adults appears to involve frequent short-duration walking behavior with low numbers of sequential steps strung together and many short-duration nonwalking (rest) behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1682/jrrd.2007.11.0197

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Omron HJ720 gives lower step counts than other pedometers because its 4-s filter results in failure to record steps during intermittent, lifestyle activities.

    “This is one reason why the Omron HJ720 gives lower step counts than other pedometers, because it has a 4-s filter that results in failure to record steps during intermittent, lifestyle activities.”
  • Orendurff showed that the most common walking bouts last only four steps, and the next most common bouts last six, eight, ten, 12 steps, etc.

    “Orendurff [37] showed that the most common walking bouts last only four steps, and the next most common bouts last six, eight, ten, 12 steps, etc.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orendurff, M. S.
Affiliations
VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Orendurff, Michael S.
Venue
The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Published
2008-12-01
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
1077-1090
ISSN
  • 0742-3241 (ISSN-L)
  • 0748-7711
OpenAlex
W2152074827
Cited by
306
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
22.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
walking bouts, walking behavior, rest periods, step count, everyday life, gait, activity monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Gait, Humans, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Cohort Studies, Walking, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review