Cited by 347Human-Animal Interaction StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionPrimate Behavior and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dogs recognize dog and human emotions

Open access

Abstract

The perception of emotional expressions allows animals to evaluate the social intentions and motivations of each other. This usually takes place within species; however, in the case of domestic dogs, it might be advantageous to recognize the emotions of humans as well as other dogs. In this sense, the combination of visual and auditory cues to categorize others' emotions facilitates the information processing and indicates high-level cognitive representations. Using a cross-modal preferential looking paradigm, we presented dogs with either human or dog faces with different emotional valences (happy/playful versus angry/aggressive) paired with a single vocalization from the same individual with either a positive or negative valence or Brownian noise. Dogs looked significantly longer at the face whose expression was congruent to the valence of vocalization, for both conspecifics and heterospecifics, an ability previously known only in humans. These results demonstrate that dogs can extract and integrate bimodal sensory emotional information, and discriminate between positive and negative emotions from both humans and dogs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 347

Metadata

Authors
Albuquerque, N., Guo, K., Wilkinson, A., Savalli, C., Otta, E., & Mills, D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Guo, Kun
Venue
Biology Letters
Published
2016-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
20150883
ISSN
  • 1744-9561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-957X
OpenAlex
W2244360783
Cited by
347
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 10
FWCI
23.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Brazil Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (N/A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
dogs, emotion recognition, emotions, cross-modal integration, facial expressions, vocalizations, emotional valence, social cognition, interspecies communication, preferential looking
MeSH terms
Anger, Animals, Cues, Discrimination, Psychological, Dogs, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Speech, Vocalization, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review