Cited by 242Polymer composites and self-healingEpoxy Resin Curing ProcessesMechanical Behavior of Composites

Self-healing of damage in fibre-reinforced polymer-matrix composites

Open access
Hayes, S.A, Zhang, W, Branthwaite, M, Jones, F.R·2007·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Abstract

Self-healing resin systems have been discussed for over a decade and four different technologies had been proposed. However, little work on their application as composite matrices has been published although this was one of the stated aims of the earliest work in the field. This paper reports on the optimization of a solid-state self-healing resin system and its subsequent use as a matrix for high volume fraction glass fibre-reinforced composites. The resin system was optimized using Charpy impact testing and repeated healing, while the efficiency of healing in composites was determined by analysing the growth of delaminations following repeated impacts with or without a healing cycle. To act as a reference, a non-healing resin system was subjected to the same treatments and the results are compared with the healable system. The optimized resin system displays a healing efficiency of 65% after the first healing cycle, dropping to 35 and 30% after the second and third healing cycles, respectively. Correction for any healability due to further curing showed that approximately 50% healing efficiency could be achieved with the bisphenol A-based epoxy resin containing 7.5% of polybisphenol-A- co -epichlorohydrin. The composite, on the other hand, displays a healing efficiency of approximately 30%. It is therefore clear that the solid-state self-healing system is capable of healing transverse cracks and delaminations in a composite, but that more work is needed to optimize matrix healing within a composite and to develop a methodology for assessing recovery in performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2006.0209

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hayes et al. found increasing temperature of mending increased healing efficiency of impact-bent epoxy-PBA blends, also true for composites Mode I.

    “Hayes et al. [19,20] found that by increasing the temperature of mending, the healing efficiency of the impact-bent epoxy resin-PBA blends increased, which is also true for the composites they examined with the Mode I tests.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, S. A., Zhang, W., Branthwaite, M., & Jones, F. R.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2007-02-20
Volume
4
Issue
13
Pages
381-387
ISSN
  • 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-5689
OpenAlex
W2164029904
Cited by
242
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Sheffield
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Keywords
self-healing materials, fibre-reinforced plastics, glass fiber reinforced composites, healing efficiency, impact damage, Charpy impact test, bisphenol A epoxy resin, transverse cracking
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Composite Resins, Epoxy Resins, Glass, Materials Testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review