Cited by 113Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Stochasticity and heterogeneity in host–vector models

Open access
Lloyd, Alun L, Zhang, Ji, Root, A.Morgan·2007·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Abstract

Demographic stochasticity and heterogeneity in transmission of infection can affect the dynamics of host-vector disease systems in important ways. We discuss the use of analytic techniques to assess the impact of demographic stochasticity in both well-mixed and heterogeneous settings. Disease invasion probabilities can be calculated using branching process methodology. We review the use of this theory for host-vector infections and examine its use in the face of heterogeneous transmission. Situations in which there is a marked asymmetry in transmission between host and vector are seen to be of particular interest. For endemic infections, stochasticity leads to variation in prevalence about the endemic level. If these fluctuations are large enough, disease extinction can occur via endemic fade-out. We develop moment equations that quantify the impact of stochasticity, providing insight into the likelihood of stochastic extinction. We frame our discussion in terms of the simple Ross malaria model, but discuss extensions to more realistic host-vector models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2007.1064

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because invasion is a stochastic phenomenon, it matters where and when the pathogen is introduced and what is the local VC.

    “Because invasion is a stochastic phenomenon, it matters where and when the pathogen is introduced and what is the local VC.93,95”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lloyd, A. L., Zhang, J., & Root, A. M.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lloyd, Alun L
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2007-06-19
Volume
4
Issue
16
Pages
851-863
ISSN
  • 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-5689
OpenAlex
W2151007516
Cited by
113
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI054954, R01-AI54954-01A2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
demographic stochasticity, transmission heterogeneity, branching processes, invasion probability, stochastic extinction, moment equations
MeSH terms
Animals, Chickens, Coccidiosis, Disease Vectors, Eimeria, Models, Biological, Poultry Diseases, Stochastic Processes, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review