Cited by 26Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsAvian ecology and behaviorPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Aerial shaking performance of wet Anna's hummingbirds

Open access
Ortega-Jimenez, Victor Manuel, Dudley, Robert·2012·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Abstract

External wetting poses problems of immediate heat loss and long-term pathogen growth for vertebrates. Beyond these risks, the locomotor ability of smaller animals, and particularly of fliers, may be impaired by water adhering to the body. Here, we report on the remarkable ability of hummingbirds to perform rapid shakes in order to expel water from their plumage even while in flight. Kinematic performance of aerial versus non-aerial shakes (i.e. those performed while perching) was compared. Oscillation frequencies of the head, body and tail were lower in aerial shakes. Tangential speeds and accelerations of the trunk and tail were roughly similar in aerial and non-aerial shakes, but values for head motions while perching were twice as high when compared with aerial shakes [corrected] . Azimuthal angular amplitudes for both aerial and non-aerial shakes reached values greater than 180° for the head, greater than 45° for the body trunk and slightly greater than 90° for the tail and wings. Using a feather on an oscillating disc to mimic shaking motions, we found that bending increased average speeds by up to 36 per cent and accelerations of the feather tip up to fourfold relative to a hypothetical rigid feather. Feather flexibility may help to enhance shedding of water and reduce body oscillations during shaking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2011.0608

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vibration frequency of other behaviors such as shivering and shaking dry scales negatively with body mass across species.

    “The vibration frequency of other behaviors, such as shivering and shaking dry, scales negatively with body mass across species [17–20].”

    From Biomechanics of the Peacock’s Display: How Feather Structure and Resonance Influence Multimodal Signaling (2016) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction reports that wet-shaking frequency varies inversely with shoulder width across terrestrial mammals, supporting the direction of the shaking-dry relationship. It does not establish scaling with body mass or address shivering frequency. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ortega-Jimenez, V. M., & Dudley, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California 1 , ,
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA)
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2011-11-09
Volume
9
Issue
70
Pages
1093-1099
ISSN
  • 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-5689
OpenAlex
W2120612931
Cited by
25
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
Anna's hummingbird, hummingbirds, flight kinematics, body oscillations
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Biomechanical Phenomena, Birds, Feathers, Flight, Animal, Male, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review