Cited by 171Complex Network Analysis TechniquesAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behavior

Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from spatio-temporal data streams

Open access
Psorakis, Ioannis, Roberts, Stephen J., Rezek, Iead, Sheldon, Ben C.·2012·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Abstract

We propose a methodology for extracting social network structure from spatio-temporal datasets that describe timestamped occurrences of individuals. Our approach identifies temporal regions of dense agent activity and links are drawn between individuals based on their co-occurrences across these 'gathering events'. The statistical significance of these connections is then tested against an appropriate null model. Such a framework allows us to exploit the wealth of analytical and computational tools of network analysis in settings where the underlying connectivity pattern between interacting agents (commonly termed the adjacency matrix) is not given a priori. We perform experiments on two large-scale datasets (greater than 10(6) points) of great tit Parus major wild bird foraging records and illustrate the use of this approach by examining the temporal dynamics of pairing behaviour, a process that was previously very hard to observe. We show that established pair bonds are maintained continuously, whereas new pair bonds form at variable times before breeding, but are characterized by a rapid development of network proximity. The method proposed here is general, and can be applied to any system with information about the temporal co-occurrence of interacting agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2012.0223

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on Psorakis et al. (2012), the workflow converts a long series of time stamps into a social network.

    “Based on the work of Psorakis et al. (2012), Fig. 4a summarizes the workflow used to convert a long series of time stamps into a social network.”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Psorakis et al. (2012)

  • Machine learning clustering methods for social affiliation appear to be robust and capture real-life pair bonds well.

    “Such methods appear to be robust and capture real-life pair bonds well (Psorakis, Roberts, Rezek, & Sheldon, 2012).”

    From Applications of machine learning in animal behaviour studies (2017) · cites this paper as Psorakis et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Newman, M. E. J. 2010 Networks: an introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Psorakis, I., Roberts, S. J., Rezek, I., & Sheldon, B. C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Psorakis, Ioannis
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2012-06-13
Volume
9
Issue
76
Pages
3055-3066
ISSN
  • 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-5689
OpenAlex
W2099888920
Cited by
171
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I011587/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/D011744/1)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (250164)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
social network inference, spatio-temporal data streams, co-occurrence networks, Parus major, bird foraging behavior, pair bonding, animal social networks, ecosystems
MeSH terms
Animals, England, Models, Theoretical, Pair Bond, Social Behavior, Spatial Behavior, Time Factors, Ecosystem, Passeriformes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review