The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis: differentiating between myth and reality
Open accessAbstract
Enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis is being increasingly exploited to better understand oxidoreductase enzymes, to develop minimalistic yet specific biosensor platforms, and to develop alternative energy conversion devices and bioelectrosynthetic devices for the production of energy and/or important chemical commodities. In some cases, these enzymes are able to electronically communicate with an appropriately designed electrode surface without the requirement of an electron mediator to shuttle electrons between the enzyme and electrode. This phenomenon has been termed direct electron transfer or direct bioelectrocatalysis. While many thorough studies have extensively investigated this fascinating feat, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate desirable enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis from electrocatalysis deriving from inactivated enzyme that may have also released its catalytic cofactor. This article will review direct bioelectrocatalysis of several oxidoreductases, with an emphasis on experiments that provide support for direct bioelectrocatalysis versus denatured enzyme or dissociated cofactor. Finally, this review will conclude with a series of proposed control experiments that could be adopted to discern successful direct electronic communication of an enzyme from its denatured counterpart.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multicopper oxidases and oxygenases
Solomon, E. I., Sundaram, U. M., & Machonkin, T. E. (1996) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr950046o · Cited by 3,664
The mononuclear molybdenum enzymes
Hille, R., Hall, J., & Basu, P. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400443z · Cited by 1,738
Anderson, L. J., Richardson, D. J., & Butt, J. N. (2001) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi002706b · Cited by 113
Quinohemoprotein alcohol dehydrogenases: structure, function, and physiology
Toyama, H., Mathews, F. S., Adachi, O., & Matsushita, K. (2004) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2004.03.037 · Cited by 109
Elliott, S. J., Hoke, K. R., Heffron, K., Palak, M., Rothery, R. A., Weiner, J. H., & Armstrong, F. A. (2004) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi035869j · Cited by 90
Cited by
Wang, X., Clément, R., Roger, M., Bauzan, M., Mazurenko, I., Poulpiquet, A. D., Ilbert, M., & Lojou, E. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b03268 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Milton, R. D., & Minteer, S. D.
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2017-06-21
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 131
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- OpenAlex
- W2636621353
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis: differentiating between myth and reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsif.2017.0253
- The paper
- Milton, R. D., & Minteer, S. D. (2017). Direct enzymatic bioelectrocatalysis: differentiating between myth and reality. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.