The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of human gait stability through foot placement
Abstract
During human walking, the centre of mass (CoM) is outside the base of support for most of the time, which poses a challenge to stabilizing the gait pattern. Nevertheless, most of us are able to walk without substantial problems. In this review, we aim to provide an integrative overview of how humans cope with an underactuated gait pattern. A central idea that emerges from the literature is that foot placement is crucial in maintaining a stable gait pattern. In this review, we explore this idea; we first describe mechanical models and concepts that have been used to predict how foot placement can be used to control gait stability. These concepts, such as for instance the extrapolated CoM concept, the foot placement estimator concept and the capture point concept, provide explicit predictions on where to place the foot relative to the body at each step, such that gait is stabilized. Next, we describe empirical findings on foot placement during human gait in unperturbed and perturbed conditions. We conclude that humans show behaviour that is largely in accordance with the aforementioned concepts, with foot placement being actively coordinated to body CoM kinematics during the preceding step. In this section, we also address the requirements for such control in terms of the sensory information and the motor strategies that can implement such control, as well as the parts of the central nervous system that may be involved. We show that visual, vestibular and proprioceptive information contribute to estimation of the state of the CoM. Foot placement is adjusted to variations in CoM state mainly by modulation of hip abductor muscle activity during the swing phase of gait, and this process appears to be under spinal and supraspinal, including cortical, control. We conclude with a description of how control of foot placement can be impaired in humans, using ageing as a primary example and with some reference to pathology, and we address alternative strategies available to stabilize gait, which include modulation of ankle moments in the stance leg and changes in body angular momentum, such as rapid trunk tilts. Finally, for future research, we believe that especially the integration of consideration of environmental constraints on foot placement with balance control deserves attention.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Active stabilization is achieved in part through lateral foot placement [23,31–34].”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415429a · Cited by 4,844
Integration of Proprioceptive and Visual Position-Information: An Experimentally Supported Model
van Beers, R. J., Sittig, A. C., & Gon, J. J. D. V. D. (1999) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1999.81.3.1355 · Cited by 742
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 116
- 10.1098/rsif.2012.0999 · DOI
- 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.1.33 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-349-09148-5_31 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00730.2011 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(86)91233-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0966-6362(96)82849-9 · DOI
- 10.1177/027836499000900206 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1107799 · DOI
- 10.1177/02783649922066655 · DOI
- Kim M, 2013, Stabilization of a three-dimensional limit cycle walking model through step-to-step ankle control, IEEE Int. Conf. Rehabil. Robot, 2013, 6650437
- 10.1098/rsif.2014.0958 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0073597 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jeb.129338 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9290(84)90080-0 · DOI
- 10.1123/kr.2017-0053 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00101-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.04.013 · DOI
- 10.1242/jeb.042572 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00221-013-3655-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90042-9 · DOI
- Kajita S Tani K. 1991 Study of dynamic biped locomotion on rugged terrain-derivation and application of the linear inverted pendulum mode. In Proc. of 1991 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation Sacramento CA 9–11 April pp. 1405–1411. New York NY: IEEE. · DOI
- Pratt J Carff J Drakunov S Goswami A. 2006 Capture point: a step toward humanoid push recovery. In Proc. of 2006 6th IEEE-RAS Int. Conf. on Humanoid Robots Genova Italy 4–6 December pp. 200–207. New York NY: IEEE. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00165-0 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00266.2005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.025 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.2815334 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.4000193 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.02.011 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2006.3637 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.humov.2007.08.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00169-5 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.1427703 · DOI
- 10.1177/0278364912452673 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2001.1761 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1109/TBME.2007.901031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.039 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.07.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.06.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.01.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0405 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rsos.160627 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.12.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.059 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002210050738 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00221-010-2424-y · DOI
- 10.1007/s00221-013-3748-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90027-C · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00138.2014 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00197-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00221-014-3885-1 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00131.2009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0931s.x · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.01260.2003 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003677-200507000-00002 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00221-005-2364-0 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001756-200507130-00013 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00764.2006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.017 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00221-001-0962-z · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00551.2015 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6472-10.2011 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03199297 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00516.2003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.03.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0607687103 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00221-014-4185-5 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00434.2015 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00103.2014 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00867.2015 · DOI
- 10.3200/JMBR.38.2.118-125 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00621.2011 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00843.2012 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00221-004-1854-9 · DOI
- 10.1002/mus.22265 · DOI
- 10.4085/1062-6050-49.5.07 · DOI
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.610360 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.08.002 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00170 · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/glr214 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.11.008 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00104 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00744.2012 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00593 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.013 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb00946.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.02.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.07.020 · DOI
- Sale P, 2013, The relation between Parkinson's disease and ageing. Comparison of the gait patterns of young Parkinson's disease subjects with healthy elderly subjects, Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med., 49, 161
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1177/0898264307299308 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.047 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.02.013 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002210050867 · DOI
- Moraes R, 2004, Strategies and determinants for selection of alternate foot placement during human locomotion: influence of spatial and temporal constraints, Exp. Brain Res., 159, 1
- 10.1152/jn.00044.2006 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2013.0700 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0033101 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.016 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00062 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12984-015-0027-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.07.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kowalsky, D. B., Rebula, J. R., Ojeda, L. V., Adamczyk, P. G., & Kuo, A. D. (2021) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228682 · Cited by 106
Best, A. N., & Wu, A. R. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34831-3 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bruijn, S. M., & van Dieën, J. H.
- ORCID
- Bruijn, Sjoerd M.
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 143
- Pages
- 20170816
- ISSN
- 1742-5689
- 1742-5662
- PMC
- PMC6030625
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.Vidi.178.014)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review