The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stepping in the direction of the fall: the next foot placement can be predicted from current upper body state in steady-state walking
Abstract
During human walking, perturbations to the upper body can be partly corrected by placing the foot appropriately on the next step. Here, we infer aspects of such foot placement dynamics using step-to-step variability over hundreds of steps of steady-state walking data. In particular, we infer dependence of the ‘next’ foot position on upper body state at different phases during the ‘current’ step. We show that a linear function of the hip position and velocity state (approximating the body center of mass state) during mid-stance explains over 80% of the next lateral foot position variance, consistent with (but not proving) lateral stabilization using foot placement. This linear function implies that a rightward pelvic deviation during a left stance results in a larger step width and smaller step length than average on the next foot placement. The absolute position on the treadmill does not add significant information about the next foot relative to current stance foot over that already available in the pelvis position and velocity. Such walking dynamics inference with steady-state data may allow diagnostics of stability and inform biomimetic exoskeleton or robot design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Active stabilization is achieved in part through lateral foot placement [23,31–34].”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bauby, 2000, Active control of lateral balance in human walking, J. Biomech., 33, 1433, 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00101-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Redfern, 1994, A model of foot placement during gait, J. Biomech., 27, 1339, 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90043-4 · DOI
- Hof, 2010, Balance responses to lateral perturbations in human treadmill walking, J. Exp. Biol., 213, 2655, 10.1242/jeb.042572 · DOI
- O'Connor, 2009, Direction-dependent control of balance during walking and standing, J. Neurophysiol., 102, 1411, 10.1152/jn.00131.2009 · DOI · Paper page
- Hurmuzlu, 1994, On the measurement of dynamic stability of human locomotion, J. Biomech. Eng., 116, 30, 10.1115/1.2895701 · DOI
- Dingwell, 2001, Local dynamic stability versus kinematic variability of continuous overground and treadmill walking, J. Biomech. Eng., 123, 27, 10.1115/1.1336798 · DOI
- Revzen, 2012, Finding the dimension of slow dynamics in a rhythmic system, J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 957, 10.1098/rsif.2011.0431 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kowalsky, D. B., Rebula, J. R., Ojeda, L. V., Adamczyk, P. G., & Kuo, A. D. (2021) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228682 · Cited by 106
The energetic cost of human walking as a function of uneven terrain amplitude
Hosseini-Yazdi, S.-S., & Kuo, A. D. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.249840 · Cited by 10
Best, A. N., & Wu, A. R. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-34831-3 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., & Srinivasan, M.
- Venue
- Biology Letters
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2014-09-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 1744-9561
- 1744-957X
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review