The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electron emission in intense electric fields
Open accessAbstract
1. Introduction.—The main features of the phenomenon of the extraction of electrons from cold metals by intense electric fields are well known, and an approximate theory of the effect was first developed by Schottky. More recently the experimental data have been much improved, notably by Millikan and Eyring, and Millikan and Lauritsen. The theory has been considered afresh by O. W. Richardson and by Houston working with Sommerfeld. It seems to us, however, that there is still room for improvement in the theoretical exposition and its correlation with the experiments. Neither O. W. Richardson nor Houston really treat the theory in the simple straightforward way which is now possible in the new mechanics, using the revived electron theory of metals which we owe to Sommerfeld. Again, while Millikan and Lauritsen seem to have established quite definitely the laws of dependence of the emission on the field strength F, they speak of the implications of their result in a way which is hard to justify and might in certain circumstances prove to be definitely misleading. Millikan and Lauritsen show that a plot of log I, where I is the current, against 1/F yields a good straight line whenever the experimental conditions are sufficiently stable. At ordinary temperatures these currents are completely independent of the temperature. The formula for these current is I = Ce─a/F, (1) Which is, of course, indistinguishable from I = CF2e─a/F. (2) Millikan and his associates have also shown that as the higher temperatures, at which ordinary thermionic emission begins, are approached, the strong field emission does become sensitive to temperature and finally blends into the thermionic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers
Hänggi, P., Talkner, P., & Borkovec, M. (1990) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.62.251 · Cited by 6,154
Herring, C., & Nichols, M. H. (1949) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.21.185 · Cited by 965
Superconducting TESLA cavities
Aune, B., Bandelmann, R., Bloess, D., Bonin, B., Bosotti, A., Champion, M., Crawford, C., Deppe, G., Dwersteg, B., Edwards, D. A., et al. (2000) · Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams · doi:10.1103/physrevstab.3.092001 · Cited by 444
Quantum mechanical tunnelling in biological systems
Devault, D. (1980) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s003358350000175x · Cited by 406
Winkler, J. R., & Gray, H. B. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja500215j · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowler, R. H., & Nordheim, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1928-05-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 781
- Pages
- 173-181
- ISSN
- 0950-1207 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9150
- OpenAlex
- W2161606023
- Cited by
- 5,752
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron emission in intense electric fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1928.0091
- The paper
- Fowler, R. H., & Nordheim, L. (1928). Electron emission in intense electric fields. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1928.0091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.