The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The scattering of fast electrons by atomic nuclei
Open accessAbstract
Section 1 .— The hypothesis that the electron has a magnetic moment was, as is well known, first introduced to account for the duplexity phenomena of atomic spectra. More recently, however, Dirac has succeeded in accounting for these same phenomena by the introduction of a modified wave equation, which conforms both to the principle of relativity and to the general transformation theory. Formally, at least, on the new theory also, the electron has a magnetic moment of εh/mc, but when the electron is in an atom we cannot observe this magnetic moment directly; we can only observe the foment of the whole atom, or, of course, the splitting of the spectral lines, which we may say is “caused” by this moment. The question arises, has the free electron "really” got a magnetic moment, a magnetic moment that we can by any conceivable experiment observe? The question is not so simple as it might seem, because a magnetic moment εh/mc can never be observed directly, e.g., with a magnetometer; there is always an uncertainty in the eternal electromagnetic field, due to the uncertainty in the position and velocity of the electron, and this uncertainty is greater than the effect of the electron magnet which we are trying to observe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bernevig, B. A., & Zhang, S.-C. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.106802 · Cited by 2,164
Spin Selectivity in Electron Transmission Through Self-Assembled Monolayers of Double-Stranded DNA
Göhler, B., Hamelbeck, V., Markus, T. Z., Kettner, M., Hanne, G. F., Vager, Z., Naaman, R., & Zacharias, H. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1199339 · Cited by 952
Spin and angle resolved photoemission on non-magnetic low-dimensional systems
Dil, J. H. (2009) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/40/403001 · Cited by 153
Spin-polarized Fermi surface mapping
Hoesch, M., Greber, T., Petrov, V. N., Muntwiler, M., Hengsberger, M., Auwärter, W., & Osterwalder, J. (2002) · Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena · doi:10.1016/s0368-2048(02)00058-0 · Cited by 151
Chang, H.-Y., Alvarado, A., Weber, T., & Marian, J. (2019) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms · doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2019.05.079 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Mott, N. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1929-06-04
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 794
- Pages
- 425-442
- ISSN
- 0950-1207 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9150
- OpenAlex
- W2136104334
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The scattering of fast electrons by atomic nuclei. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1929.0127
- The paper
- Mott, N. F. (1929). The scattering of fast electrons by atomic nuclei. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1929.0127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.