The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A quantum mechanical investigation of the cohesive forces of metallic copper
Abstract
The calculations of Wigner and Seitz have shown that the Bloch theory is capable of yielding, at any rate roughly, the lattice energy, lattice constant, and compressibility of the metal sodium, and it seems probable that their method could be applied with equal success to the other alkalis. On the other hand, no calculations have as yet been made for the noble metals. Such a calculations is given in this paper. The noble metals differ from the alkalis in having cores which are much larger compared with the atomic volume than those of the alkalis, and the main purpose of this paper is to see whether direct interaction between the pressibility, etc. We have also attempted to find out why the noble metals have the face-centred cubic structure, while the alkalis are body-centred. In 2 we calculate the wave functions and energies of the valence electrons (4s) of metallic copper. We chose copper for this calculation, because a self-consistent field due to Hartree is available. Wigner and Seitz did not use the self-consistent field for sodium, but a half empirical potential function for the sodium ion, calculated by Prokofjew from the observed term values. This potential therefore includes implicitly the exchange interaction between the valence electrons and the inner shells, so far as this may be represented by an electrostatic potential. With the self-consistent field the exchange has to be taken into account explicitly; we have done this by solving approximately, instead of the simple Schroedinger equation, Fock’s wave equation, which includes the exchange. Apart from this the calculation in 2 is entirely analogous to that of Wigner and Seitz. It will be shown that for copper this calculations given at least the right order of magnitude for the lattice constant and for the heat of vaporization, but a totally incorrect value for the compressibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electronic properties of two-dimensional systems
Ando, T., Fowler, A. B., & Stern, F. (1982) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.437 · Cited by 7,455
Quantum theory of cohesive properties of solids
Löwdin, P.-O. (1956) · Advances in Physics · doi:10.1080/00018735600101155 · Cited by 1,207
Herring, C., & Nichols, M. H. (1949) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.21.185 · Cited by 965
Stresses in semiconductors:Ab initio calculations on Si, Ge, and GaAs
Nielsen, O. H., & Martin, R. M. (1985) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.32.3792 · Cited by 678
Energy, Specific Heat, and Magnetic Properties of the Low-Density Electron Gas
Carr, W. J. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.122.1437 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1935-10-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 874
- Pages
- 585-602
- ISSN
- 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9169
- OpenAlex
- W2163594798
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantum mechanical investigation of the cohesive forces of metallic copper. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1935.0167
- The paper
- Fuchs, K. (1935). A quantum mechanical investigation of the cohesive forces of metallic copper. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1935.0167
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.