The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. - II. The atomic explosion of 1945
Abstract
Photographs by J. E. Mack of the first atomic explosion in New Mexico were measured, and the radius, R, of the luminous globe or ‘ball of fire’ which spread out from the centre was determined for a large range of values of t, the time measured from the start of the explosion. The relationship predicted in part I, namely, that R* would be proportional to t, is surprisingly accurately verified over a range from R = 20 to 185 m. The value of R"t-1 so found was used in conjunction with the formulae of part I to estimate the energy E which was generated in the explosion. The amount of this estimate depends on what value is assumed for y, the ratio of the specific heats of air. Two estimates are given in terms of the number of tons of the chemical explosive T.N.T. which would release the same energy. The first is probably the more accurate and is 16,800 tons. The second, which is 23,700 tons, probably overestimates the energy, but is included to show the amount of error which might be expected if the effect of radiation were neglected and that of high temperature on the specific heat of air were taken into account. Reasons are given for believing that these two effects neutralize one another. After the explosion a hemispherical volume of very hot gas is left behind and Mack’s photographs were used to measure the velocity of rise of the glowing centre of the heated volume. This velocity was found to be 35 m./sec. Until the hot air suffers turbulent mixing with the surrounding cold air it may be expected to rise like a large bubble in water. The radius of the ‘equivalent bubble’ is calculated and found to be 293 m. The vertical velocity of a bubble of this radius is 2/3 √(g 29300) or 35.7 m./sec. The agreement with the measured value, 35 m./sec., is better than the nature of the measurements permits one to expect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolution of Nonradiative Supernova Remnants
Truelove, J. K., & McKee, C. F. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313176 · Cited by 566
Ostriker, J. P., & McKee, C. F. (1988) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.60.1 · Cited by 436
Phantom: A Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics and Magnetohydrodynamics Code for Astrophysics
Price, D. J., Wurster, J., Tricco, T. S., Nixon, C., Toupin, S., Pettitt, A., Chan, C., Mentiplay, D., Laibe, G., Glover, S., et al. (2018) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2018.25 · Cited by 429
Water entry of small hydrophobic spheres
ARISTOFF, J. M., & BUSH, J. W. M. (2009) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112008004382 · Cited by 422
Self-similarity in ultrafast nonlinear optics
Dudley, J. M., Finot, C., Richardson, D. J., & Millot, G. (2007) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys705 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, G. I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1950-03-22
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 1065
- Pages
- 175-186
- ISSN
- 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9169
- OpenAlex
- W2004203489
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. - II. The atomic explosion of 1945. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1950.0050
- The paper
- Taylor, G. I. (1950). The formation of a blast wave by a very intense explosion. - II. The atomic explosion of 1945. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1950.0050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.