Cited by 105Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsRelativity and Gravitational TheoryScientific Research and Discoveries

Must the photon mass be zero?

Bass, L., Schrodinger, Erwin·1955·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Abstract

The old query concerning longitudinal waves, which already beset the elastic theory of light, has in our day revived in the form expressed in the title. Maxwell’s field laws are a singular limiting case in that they admit but transversal waves. If this held only in however close an approximation, some fundamental laws of radiation would seem to be affected by a factor 3/2, on account of the ‘third degree of freedom’. If so, this would render even Maxwell’s theory suspect, for we are loath to accept as an adequate description of nature a limiting case whose predictions differ grossly and discontinuously from those reached by a sufficiently close approach to the limit. We show here in the simple, if fictitious, example of an ideal conductor, that by extending Proca’s field equations in a plausible fashion to the interior of matter the discontinuity is avoided and the correct factors (not 3/2 thereof) are already reached with a rest-mass at the upper limit, imposed anyhow by other well-known considerations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1955.0197

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of the very weak interaction of longitudinal photons with matter, approaching a statistical equilibrium state of longitudinal photons in a cavity is extremely slow, with a time-scale comparable to the age of the universe.

    “Because of the very weak interaction of longitudinal photons with matter, approaching to a statistical equilibrium state of longitudinal photons in a cavity is extremely slow, with a time-scale comparable to the age of the universe [59-61].”

    From Electrodynamics on cosmological scales (2016) · cites this paper as [59]

  • When ξ = m_A^2 = 0, a generalized Poynting flux vector is derived in Appendix C and given by equation (C14).

    “When ξ = m 2 A = 0, a generalized Poynting flux vector is derived in Appendix C and given by equation (C14) (see also [59]).”

    From Electrodynamics on cosmological scales (2016) · cites this paper as [59]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bass, L., & Schrodinger, E.
Affiliations
  • Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
  • Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Published
1955-10-11
Volume
232
Issue
1188
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9169
OpenAlex
W1965865449
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Scientific Research and Discoveries
Keywords
photon mass, longitudinal electromagnetic waves, Maxwell's equations, perfect electric conductor, radiation laws, transverse waves

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review