Must the photon mass be zero?
Abstract
The old query concerning longitudinal waves, which already beset the elastic theory of light, has in our day revived in the form expressed in the title. Maxwell’s field laws are a singular limiting case in that they admit but transversal waves. If this held only in however close an approximation, some fundamental laws of radiation would seem to be affected by a factor 3/2, on account of the ‘third degree of freedom’. If so, this would render even Maxwell’s theory suspect, for we are loath to accept as an adequate description of nature a limiting case whose predictions differ grossly and discontinuously from those reached by a sufficiently close approach to the limit. We show here in the simple, if fictitious, example of an ideal conductor, that by extending Proca’s field equations in a plausible fashion to the interior of matter the discontinuity is avoided and the correct factors (not 3/2 thereof) are already reached with a rest-mass at the upper limit, imposed anyhow by other well-known considerations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because of the very weak interaction of longitudinal photons with matter, approaching a statistical equilibrium state of longitudinal photons in a cavity is extremely slow, with a time-scale comparable to the age of the universe.
“Because of the very weak interaction of longitudinal photons with matter, approaching to a statistical equilibrium state of longitudinal photons in a cavity is extremely slow, with a time-scale comparable to the age of the universe [59-61].”
From Electrodynamics on cosmological scales (2016) · cites this paper as [59]
When ξ = m_A^2 = 0, a generalized Poynting flux vector is derived in Appendix C and given by equation (C14).
“When ξ = m 2 A = 0, a generalized Poynting flux vector is derived in Appendix C and given by equation (C14) (see also [59]).”
From Electrodynamics on cosmological scales (2016) · cites this paper as [59]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photon and graviton mass limits
Goldhaber, A. S., & Nieto, M. M. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.939 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Tu, L.-C., Luo, J., & Gillies, G. T. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/1/r02 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Electrodynamics on cosmological scales
Li, L.-X. (2016) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-016-2028-3 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bass, L., & Schrodinger, E.
- Affiliations
- Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies (IE)
- Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1955-10-11
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 1188
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9169
- OpenAlex
- W1965865449
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Scientific Research and Discoveries
- Keywords
- photon mass, longitudinal electromagnetic waves, Maxwell's equations, perfect electric conductor, radiation laws, transverse waves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review