Electrodynamics on cosmological scales
Open accessAI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper argues that Maxwell’s equations fail on cosmological scales for a universe with a net charge, especially in a closed universe, and proposes curvature-coupled modified Maxwell equations as a more fundamental fix than a Proca photon-mass term. The modification returns to Maxwell’s equations in Ricci-flat spacetime and may be testable in neutron-star interiors and the early universe.
Key findings
- Maxwell’s equations cannot describe a homogeneous and isotropic universe with a uniformly distributed net charge: the field tensor must vanish, forcing the current to vanish (Type I Paradox). In a closed universe with nonzero net charge, Maxwell’s equations always fail regardless of spacetime symmetry or charge distribution (Type II Paradox).
- A Proca-type modification with a \(-\xi A_a\) term can resolve the paradoxes, with photon mass \(m_A=\xi^{1/2}\), but the mass disappears when symmetry is restored and the paradoxes reappear.
- A curvature-coupled equation containing \(\kappa R^a{}_b A^b\) also resolves the paradoxes, introduces only a dimensionless \(\kappa\), returns to Maxwell’s equations when \(R_{ab}=0\), and with a cosmological constant reduces to a Proca equation with \(\xi=\kappa\Lambda\) and \(m_A=(\kappa\Lambda)^{1/2}\), corresponding to \(\lambda_A\sim 10^{28}\) cm.
- Consequences include a photon-mass time delay \(\Delta t\lesssim 10^{-8}\) s for \(\lambda_A\gtrsim 10^{14}\) cm, charge-excess constraints \(\chi<2.1\,d_H/\lambda_A\) from \(\rho_A<\rho_m\) and \(\chi<0.01\,d_H/\lambda_A\) from \(\rho_A<\rho_r\), and testability when \(r_c\lesssim r_A\), e.g., neutron stars with \(r\approx 10^6\) cm, \(\rho\approx 5\times 10^{14}\) g cm\(^{-3}\), and \(r_c\approx 10^6\) cm, and the early universe.
Methods
- Theoretical general-relativistic derivation: covariant Maxwell equations, Gauss’s law on spacelike hypersurfaces, and compact spatial sections are used to prove the Type I and Type II paradoxes.
- Modified field equations are constructed from Lagrangians: a Proca/Higgs-mechanism photon-mass term and a curvature-coupled term; stress-energy tensors, charge conservation, Lorentz force, and Poynting flux are derived.
- Existing photon-mass limits and cosmological parameters are used for estimates, including \(\Omega_m=0.3\), \(\Omega_b=0.043\), \(h=0.7\), \(\Omega_r=4.2\times 10^{-5}h^{-2}\), and \(z=1100\); no new observational data are analyzed.
Limitations
- The paper states that the Proca solution is not ultimate because symmetry restoration removes the photon mass and the paradoxes return; curvature-coupled effects may be unobservable in the present universe unless there is a net charge or strong curvature.
- The paper states that the charge constraints assume a constant \(\xi\) and rely on simple comparisons of \(\rho_A\) with matter and radiation densities; more complex analyses, such as CMB temperature fluctuations, may give stronger constraints.
- Evident from the text: no direct experimental detection or observational confirmation is presented, and testability is argued only for extreme environments such as neutron-star interiors and the early universe.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
12 of 56 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6
When ξ is positive, equation (10) is equivalent to the Proca equation.
“When ξ is positive, this equation is equivalent to the Proca equation [34-36] and m A ≡ ξ 1 / 2 can be interpreted as the rest mass of photons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [34] Ryder, L.H.: Quantum Field Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996) source
- cites [35] Tu, L.C., Luo, J., Gillies, G.T.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 77 (2005) source
- cites [36] Goldhaber, A.S., Nieto, M.M.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 939 (2010) source
Section B (p. 5) describes the Proca modification of Maxwell’s equations as giving the photon a nonzero rest mass. The equations in our copy are not decoded, however, and the text does not identify the citing paper’s equation (10) or its parameter ξ. It therefore supports the general Proca–photon-mass connection, but not the stated equivalence under ξ > 0. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6
m_A ≡ ξ^{1/2} can be interpreted as the rest mass of photons.
“When ξ is positive, this equation is equivalent to the Proca equation [34-36] and m A ≡ ξ 1 / 2 can be interpreted as the rest mass of photons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [34] Ryder, L.H.: Quantum Field Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996) source
- cites [35] Tu, L.C., Luo, J., Gillies, G.T.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 77 (2005) source
- cites [36] Goldhaber, A.S., Nieto, M.M.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 939 (2010) source
“Photon mass from the Proca equation” (pp. 5–6) says that Proca’s modification can give the photon a nonzero rest mass. The passages do not define ξ or establish that √ξ is that mass, so the specific identification is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisenone given§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11
There is no observational or experimental evidence for gauge invariance of electromagnetic fields in a curved spacetime with a nonvanishing Ricci curvature.
“We also remark that there is no observational or experimental evidence for gauge invariance of electromagnetic fields in a curved spacetime with a nonvanishing Ricci curvature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] Goldhaber, A.S., Nieto, M.M.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 939 (2010) source
The discussion of gauge invariance (p. 9) calls the symmetry unobservable, but does not assess observational or experimental evidence for electromagnetic gauge invariance in curved spacetime. Searches for Ricci curvature and tests in curved spacetime found no passage addressing the claim’s specific setting. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [48] Schwartz, M.D.: Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013) source
- Findingreasoning§ VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12
If there exists a cosmological constant as current observations indicated, the κR^b_a A^a term in equation (33) gives rise to a photon mass m_A = (κΛ)^{1/2}, corresponding to λ_A ∼ 10^28 cm (the size of the cosmic horizon).
“For example, as mentioned in Sec. IV, if there exists a cosmological constant as current observations indicated [49, 50], the κR b a A a term in equation (33) gives rise to a photon mass m A = ( κ Λ) 1 / 2 , corresponding to λ A ∼ 10 28 cm (the size of the cosmic horizon).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked - Findingreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16
The requirement Ω_A < Ω_m provides a first constraint on the value of y.
“The requirement that ω A ( z = 0) = Ω A < Ω m provides the first constraint on the value of y”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [49] Dunkley, J., et al.: 2009. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 306 (2009) source
Section 3.2.2 discusses measurements involving Ω_m, but does not state Ω_A < Ω_m or connect that inequality to a constraint on y. Searches for the inequality and the proposed constraint found no passage addressing them in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [50] Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al., arXiv:1502.01589 (2015) source
Section 5.2 reports a measured value of Ω_m, but it does not discuss Ω_A or a parameter y. Searches for the stated inequality and for Ω_A as a constraint on y found no passage establishing that relationship or calling it a first constraint. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- The authors state this as an assumption: A proton has charge (1+y)|e| with |y|≪1.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe contains an equal number of electrons and protons.
- Findingreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
For a closed universe with a nonzero net charge, Maxwell's equations always fail regardless of spacetime symmetry and charge distribution.
“For a closed universe with a nonzero net charge, Maxwell's equations always fail regardless of the spacetime symmetry and the charge distribution.”
- Also stated in: § II. FAILURE OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS ON COSMOLOGICAL SCALES · p. 6 · plain
“Maxwell's equations cannot describe a closed universe with a nonzero net charge without any requirement on spacetime symmetry and charge distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § II. FAILURE OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS ON COSMOLOGICAL SCALES · p. 6 · plain
- Findingreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
Maxwell's equations cannot describe a homogeneous and isotropic universe with a uniformly distributed net charge, because the electromagnetic field tensor must vanish everywhere in such a universe.
“Maxwell's equations cannot describe a homogeneous and isotropic universe with a uniformly distributed net charge, because the electromagnetic field tensor in such a universe must be vanishing everywhere.”
- Also stated in: § II. FAILURE OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS ON COSMOLOGICAL SCALES · p. 4 · plain
“This immediately implies that the inhomogeneous Maxwell equation (3) cannot describe a homogeneous and isotropic universe with a uniformly distributed net charge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § II. FAILURE OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS ON COSMOLOGICAL SCALES · p. 4 · plain
- Findingreasoning§ II. FAILURE OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS ON COSMOLOGICAL SCALES · p. 6
Maxwell's equations imply that the total charge in a closed universe must always be zero, without relying on homogeneity, isotropy, or uniform charge distribution.
“Thus, Maxwell's equations imply that the total charge in a closed universe must always be zero . This statement does not rely on the assumption of homogeneity and isotropy of the universe and uniform distribution of the charge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
The Proca-type modified Maxwell equation, which contains a photon mass term, can address the paradoxes.
“We consider two types of modified Maxwell equations, both can address the paradoxes.”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
“First, we show that an electromagnetic field equation with a photon mass term (i.e., the Proca equation) can address the paradoxes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
- Findingown data§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
For reasonable parameters, the modification does not affect existing experiments and observations.
“The results show that for reasonable parameters the modification does not affect existing experiments and observations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
In a homogeneous and isotropic universe with a uniformly distributed net charge, Gauss's law is violated because E=0 everywhere while the charge density is nonzero.
“For a homogeneous and isotropic universe filled with a uniformly distributed charge, we have E = 0 everywhere since otherwise E would provide a preferred direction. Then Gauss's law is violated, since the right-hand side of equation (2) is nonzero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8
The Lagrangian (25)-(26) is invariant under the gauge transformation defined by equations (27).
“The Lagrangian is obviously invariant under the gauge transformation defined by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6
For an electric charge uniformly distributed in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the solution to equation (10) is given by equation (11).
“For instance, for an electric charge uniformly distributed in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the solution to equation (10) is”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7
The electromagnetic field equation (10) can be derived from the action (15) with Lagrangian density L_EM defined by equation (16).
“The electromagnetic field equation (10) can be derived from the action”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8
Since μ^2 > 0, the potential V(φ) acquires a minimum at |φ| = φ_0 ≡ μ/λ^{1/2}.
“Since µ 2 > 0, the potential V ( φ ) acquires a minimum at | φ | = φ 0 ≡ µ/λ 1 / 2 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7
Variation of S_EM (J_a=0) with respect to g_ab gives rise to the stress-energy tensor of electromagnetic fields.
“Variation of S EM ( J a = 0) with respect to g ab gives rise to the stress-energy tensor of electromagnetic fields [27]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Wald, R.M.: General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984) source
- Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8
Substituting equation (23) into equation (21) gives the usual equation for the Lorentz force (24).
“Substituting equation (23) into equation (21), we get the usual equation for the Lorentz force”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8
The Lagrangian in equation (30) describes a massive and real scalar field φ_1 interacting with a massive electromagnetic field A_a.
“Clearly, the Lagrangian in equation (30) describes a massive and real scalar field φ 1 interacting with a massive electromagnetic field A a .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
For a spacetime with R_ab = 0, equation (33) becomes the standard Maxwell equation.
“For a spacetime with R ab = 0, it becomes the standard Maxwell equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11
The Maxwell equation in a flat spacetime can be expressed in terms of a symmetric tensor H_ab instead of the anti-symmetric tensor.
“To do so, we first show that the Maxwell equation in a flat spacetime can be expressed in terms of a symmetric tensor instead of the anti-symmetric tensor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
For a spacetime with R_ab = Λ g_ab, equation (33) reduces to equation (10) with ξ = κ Λ.
“For a spacetime with R ab = Λ g ab , where Λ is the cosmological constant, the electromagnetic field equation (33) reduces to equation (10) with ξ = κ Λ.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
Equation (33) does not rely on the existence of another matter field, e.g., a scalar Higgs field.
“It also does not rely on the existence of another matter field, e.g., a scalar Higgs field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the potential vector A_a = Φ(t)u_a automatically implies F_ab = 0.
“By the discussions in Sec. III, the potential vector A a = Φ( t ) u a automatically implies F ab = 0.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 10
Conservation of electric charge, ∇_a J^a = 0, implies that the gauge condition (39) has to be satisfied.
“Hence, the conservation of electric charge, ∇ a J a = 0, implies that the gauge condition”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8
The mass of the scalar field φ_1 is m = √2 μ.
“The mass of the scalar field φ 1 is m = √ 2 µ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
Equation (33) does not introduce a new and small dimensional parameter, unlike the modified equation (10).
“It does not introduce a new and small dimensional parameter, unlike the modified equation (10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11
The Lagrangian (53) is identical to that in equation (32) with κ = -2, up to a boundary term which has no contribution to the action integral.
“It can be checked that the above Lagrangian is identical to that in equation (32) with κ = -2, up to a boundary term which has no contribution to the action integral.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11
The electromagnetic field equation (51) can be derived from an action with Lagrangian density (53) by variation with respect to A_a.
“The electromagnetic field equation (51) can be derived from an action with a Lagrangian density”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
For ħω ≫ m_A c^2, the energy spectrum of longitudinal photons should be given by equation (69).
“Hence, for ℏ ω ≫ m A c 2 , the energy spectrum of longitudinal photons should be”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
For a given statistical state, the number of longitudinal photons is always suppressed by a factor m_A^2/2ω^2 relative to the number of transverse photons.
“For a given statistical state, the number of longitudinal photons are always suppressed by a factor m 2 A / 2 ω 2 relative to the number of transverse photons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16
The condition ω_A < Ω_r(1+z)^4 at z=1100 provides an even stronger constraint on y.
“An even stronger constraint on y comes from the condition of ω A < Ω r (1 + z ) 4 at z = 1100 (the redshift of cosmic recombination), where we have used the fact that the density of radiation ρ r ∝ (1 + z ) 4 . Since ω A ∝ (1 + z ) 6 , we get”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A proton has charge (1+y)|e| with |y|≪1.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe contains an equal number of electrons and protons.
- Rests on an assumption: The radiation density scales as ρ_r ∝ (1+z)^4.
- Findingreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16
The requirement Ω_A < Ω_r provides a stronger constraint on y.
“A stronger constraint comes from the requirement that Ω A < Ω r . Adopting Ω r = 4 . 2 × 10 -5 h -2 (including the massless neutrinos and the cosmic microwave background [18, 19]), we get”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [18] Peebles, P.J.E.: Principles of Physical Cosmology. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993) source
- cites [19] Weinberg, S.: Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008) source
- The authors state this as an assumption: A proton has charge (1+y)|e| with |y|≪1.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe contains an equal number of electrons and protons.
- Findingreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
The requirement ρ_A < ρ_r at z=0 leads to χ < 2(Ω_r/3)^1/2 Ω_m^-1 d_H/λ_A ≈ 0.01 d_H/λ_A.
“The requirement of ρ A < ρ r (the mean mass density of radiation) at z = 0 leads to χ < 2(Ω r / 3) 1 / 2 Ω -1 m d H /λ A ≈ 0 . 01 d H /λ A .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe has a mean net charge density ρ_e = χ ρ_m, where χ is the ratio of charge to mass.
- Findingreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
For a universe containing an equal number of electrons and protons, the total net charge density at any redshift z is ρ_e = y ρ_b |e|/m_p.
“For a universe containing an equal number of electrons and protons, the total net charge density in the universe at any redshift z is given by ρ e = yρ b | e | /m p , where m p is the proton mass, and ρ b is the average mass density of baryons in the universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: A proton has charge (1+y)|e| with |y|≪1.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe contains an equal number of electrons and protons.
- Findingreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
The requirement ρ_A < ρ_m at z=0 leads to χ < 2(3Ω_m)^-1/2 d_H/λ_A ≈ 2.1 d_H/λ_A.
“For example, the requirement of ρ A < ρ m at z = 0 leads to χ < 2(3Ω m ) -1 / 2 d H /λ A ≈ 2 . 1 d H /λ A .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe has a mean net charge density ρ_e = χ ρ_m, where χ is the ratio of charge to mass.
- Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
By equation (68), when kT ≪ m_A c^2 we get P_s=1 : P_s=-1 : P_s=0 = 1 : 1 : 1.
“Then, by equation (68) we get P s =1 : P s = -1 : P s =0 = 1 : 1 : 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
The electromagnetic field density parameter scales with redshift as ω_A = Ω_A (1+z)^6.
“If the value of ω A at the present time (i.e., at z = 0) is denoted by Ω A , we find ω A = Ω A (1 + z ) 6 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
The curvature-coupled term can naturally arise from the ambiguity in extending Maxwell's equations from a flat spacetime to a curved spacetime through the 'minimal substitution rule'.
“We show that the curvature-coupled term can naturally arise from the ambiguity in extending Maxwell's equations from a flat spacetime to a curved spacetime through the 'minimal substitution rule'.”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
“Because of this ambiguity in the 'minimal substitution rule', generalization of a law of physics in a curved spacetime is determined only up to addition of a term coupled to the spacetime curvature. Hence, it is natural to consider an electromagnetic field equation with a curvature-coupled term, since the field equation contains second-order derivatives of the potential vector.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
- Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3
In a Ricci-flat spacetime, gauge invariance is restored.
“This means that in a Ricci-flat spacetime gauge invariance is restored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4
For electromagnetic fields, the presence of a curvature-coupled term in the field equation can represent interaction of electromagnetic fields with the spacetime curvature.
“For the case of electromagnetic fields, the presence of a curvature-coupled term in the field equation can represent interaction of electromagnetic fields with the spacetime curvature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
The effect of the curvature-coupled term can be detectable or testable in astrophysical environments with high mass density or in the early universe when radiation drives the dynamics of cosmic expansion.
“However, we argue that, the field equations with a curvature-coupled term can be testable in astrophysical environments where the mass density is high or the gravity of electromagnetic radiations plays a dominant role in dynamics, e.g., the interior of neutron stars and the early universe.”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4 · plain
“We find that, the effect of the curvature-coupled term can be detectable in an astrophysical environment with a high mass density, or in the early universe when radiation drives the dynamics of cosmic expansion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4 · plain
- Premisecitation§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4
The 'minimal substitution rule' is essentially reflection of the principle of equivalence, which states that at any point in a spacetime it is possible to choose a free-fall frame where in a sufficiently small region the law of physics takes the form as in a flat spacetime.
“The 'minimal substitution rule' is essentially reflection of the principle of equivalence, which states that at any point in a spacetime it is possible to choose a free-fall frame where in a sufficiently small region the law of physics takes the form as in a flat spacetime [22, 27].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] Weinberg, S.: Gravitation and Cosmology. Wiley, New York (1972)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [27] Wald, R.M.: General Relativity. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3
If there is a cosmological constant in the universe, the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation implies a photon mass determined by the cosmological constant.
“If there is a cosmological constant in the universe, the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation implies a photon mass determined by the cosmological constant. In this sense we can say that the new electromagnetic field equation implies the Proca equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
A photon mass term in the electromagnetic field equation can naturally arise from spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Higgs mechanism in quantum field theory, where photons acquire mass by eating massless Goldstone bosons.
“This type of electromagnetic field equations can naturally arise from spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Higgs mechanism in quantum field theory, where photons acquire a mass by eating massless Goldstone bosons.”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · boosted
“in quantum field theory it is well known that a gauge field can acquire a mass through spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Higgs mechanism [33, 34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · boosted
- Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4
The presence of a term coupled to the spacetime curvature in the law of physics does not violate the principle of equivalence.
“Therefore, the presence of a term coupled to the spacetime curvature in the law of physics does not violate the principle of equivalence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4
A curvature-coupled term cannot be recovered by the 'minimal substitution rule', since it does not show up in a flat spacetime.
“Such a term cannot be recovered by the 'minimal substitution rule', since it does not show up in a flat spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
The two paradoxes indicate that Maxwell's equations need be modified to be applicable to the universe as a whole.
“The two paradoxes indicate that Maxwell's equations need be modified to be applicable to the universe as a whole.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3
An electromagnetic field equation with a photon mass term is possible.
“So an electromagnetic field equation with a photon mass term is possible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4
When the standard Maxwell equation in a curved spacetime is expressed as a second-order differential equation of the potential vector, a curvature-coupled term also appears.
“In fact, when the standard Maxwell equation in a curved spacetime is expressed as a second-order differential equation of the potential vector (i.e., as a wave equation) a curvature-coupled term also appears [27], whose effects have been studied in [45, 46].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1
The modified Maxwell equations with a term coupling the electromagnetic field potential vector to the spacetime curvature tensor can address the paradoxes.
“The other type of modified Maxwell equations, which are more attractive in our opinions, contain a term with the electromagnetic field potential vector coupled to the spacetime curvature tensor.”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
“Since a non-empty universe must not be Ricci-flat, the paradoxes can be addressed by the inclusion of a curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A non-empty universe must not be Ricci-flat.
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
- Interpretationreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6
Maxwell's equations have a fundamental flaw when applied to the universe as a whole.
“In Sec. II we have shown that Maxwell's equations cannot describe a universe with a nonzero total charge, which indicates that Maxwell's equations have a fundamental flaw when they are applied to the universe as a whole.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3
There is no known first principle to force the total charge in a universe to be exactly zero.
“However, there is no known first principle to force the total charge in a universe to be exactly zero. At least there is yet no such a principle that we know.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6
An effective ξ A_a A^a term can naturally arise from spontaneous symmetry breaking by the Higgs mechanism if the electromagnetic field is coupled to a complex scalar field.
“Although ξ can just be a fundamental constant in nature, an effective ξA a term can naturally arise from spontaneous symmetry breaking by the Higgs mechanism if the electromagnetic field is coupled to a complex scalar field [33, 34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8
When charge is conserved, the ξ-term in the stress-energy tensor, (1)T_EM,ab given by equation (20), has no effect on the dynamics of charged particles.
“Equation (24) indicates that when charge is conserved, the ξ -term in the stress-energy tensor, i.e., the (1) T EM ,ab given by equation (20), has no effect on the dynamics of charged particles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6
With field equation (10), the Type I Paradox described in Sec. II can be addressed.
“With the field equation (10), the Type I Paradox described in Sec. II can be addressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7
Hence the Type II Paradox disappears too.
“Hence the Type II Paradox disappears too.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8
The term (1)T_EM,ab affects the spacetime curvature through Einstein's field equations.
“However, the term (1) T EM ,ab affects the spacetime curvature through Einstein's field equations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
Equation (33) can solve the Type I Paradox described in Sec. II.
“Let us check that equation (33) can solve the Type I Paradox described in Sec. II.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 10
Even if the 'minimal substitution rule' is insisted, different electromagnetic field equations can be obtained in a curved spacetime.
“So, even if the 'minimal substitution rule' is insisted, different electromagnetic field equations can be obtained in a curved spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 10
If a field equation in a flat spacetime contains second or higher order derivatives of a vector or a tensor, the corresponding field equation in a curved spacetime derived by the 'minimal substitution rule' is not unique.
“If a field equation in a flat spacetime contains second or higher order derivatives of a vector or a tensor, the corresponding field equation in a curved spacetime derived by the 'minimal substitution rule' is not unique.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
If the universe contains a cosmological constant, equation (33) implies the Proca-type equation with a photon mass determined by the cosmological constant.
“In this sense, we can say that the electromagnetic field equation (33) implies the Proca-type equation with a photon mass determined by the cosmological constant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 10
The 'minimal substitution rule' cannot guarantee that the equation derived with it must be correct in physics in a curved spacetime.
“Although it can guarantee that the derived equation in a curved spacetime satisfies the principle of general covariance and returns to the correct equation in a flat spacetime, the 'minimal substitution rule' cannot guarantee that the equation derived with it must be correct in physics in a curved spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the Ricci curvature tensor R_ab must have the form R_ab = α(t)u_a u_b + β(t)h_ab.
“For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the Ricci curvature tensor R ab must have a form of R ab = α ( t ) u a u b + β ( t ) h ab”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
The modification to the Maxwell equation considered here does not affect the electrodynamics in a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime.
“This means that, unlike in the case of equation (10), the modification to the Maxwell equation considered here does not affect the electrodynamics in a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 10
The equation of a conformally invariant scalar field cannot be derived from its version in a flat spacetime by the 'minimal substitution rule'.
“Since the term Rφ/ 6 is missing in a flat spacetime, the equation of a conformally invariant scalar field cannot be derived from its version in a flat spacetime (i.e., the Klein-Gordon equation for a massless scalar field) by the 'minimal substitution rule'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Birrell, N.D., Davies, P.C.W.: Quantum Fields in Curved Space. The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9
With the electromagnetic field equation (33), the Type II Paradox is also addressed.
“Similar to the discussion in Sec. III, with the electromagnetic field equation (33), the Type II Paradox is also addressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11
Since κ can be any number (or any function), the 'minimal substitution rule' can give rise to an infinite number of field equations in a curved spacetime corresponding to the Maxwell equation in a flat spacetime.
“Therefore, since κ can be any number (it can be any function in fact), the 'minimal substitution rule' can give rise to an infinite number of field equations in a curved spacetime corresponding to the Maxwell equation in a flat spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8
Spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Higgs mechanism cannot be considered as the ultimate solution to the inconsistency problem in application of Maxwell's equations to a universe with a net charge.
“Although spontaneous symmetry breaking and the Higgs mechanism naturally give rise to an electromagnetic field equation in the form of equation (10), they cannot be considered as the ultimate solution to the inconsistency problem in application of Maxwell's equations to a universe with a net charge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13
There is a profound discontinuity as the mass of photons approaches zero: massive photons have three degrees of freedom, but massless photons have only two.
“There is a profound discontinuity as the mass of photons approaches zero: massive photons have three degrees of freedom, but massless photons have only two.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Aragao de Carvalho, C., Rosa Jr., S.G.: J. Phys. A 13, 3233 (1980) source
- cites [57] Mohling, F.: Statistical Mechanics: Methods and Applications. Wiley, New York (1983)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13
For massless photons, the statistical degeneracy factor is g = 2.
“For massless photons we have g = 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 12
The paradoxes arising from application of Maxwell's equations to a universe as described in Sec. II demand the inclusion of the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.
“The paradoxes arising from application of Maxwell's equations to a universe as described in Sec. II demands the inclusion of the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 12
The above arguments support the proposal of equation (33) as a candidate for the electromagnetic field equation in a curved spacetime.
“The above arguments support the proposal of equation (33) as a candidate for the electromagnetic field equation in a curved spacetime.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12
Equation (10) indicates an intrinsic photon mass, if ξ is interpreted as a fundamental constant.
“Equation (10) indicates an intrinsic photon mass, if ξ is interpreted as a fundamental constant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12
Both types of modified Maxwell's equations discussed in previous sections have the unavoidable consequence that photons can have a nonzero rest mass.
“Both the two types of modified Maxwell's equations discussed in previous sections have an unavoidable consequence: photons can have a nonzero rest mass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13
Massive photons are described by the statistics of relativistic Bose gases.
“Massive photons are described by the statistics of relativistic Bose gases [56, 57].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [56] Aragao de Carvalho, C., Rosa Jr., S.G.: J. Phys. A 13, 3233 (1980) source
- cites [57] Mohling, F.: Statistical Mechanics: Methods and Applications. Wiley, New York (1983)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12
Equation (33) indicates an effective photon mass as a function of the local spacetime curvature.
“Equation (33) indicates an effective photon mass as a function of the local spacetime curvature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ A. Propagation time delay of photons with different energy · p. 12
Attempts in measuring or giving a limit on the photon mass by observing the difference in the arriving time of photons with different frequencies emitted by the same source are disfavored, since for any reasonable value of a photon mass the effect turns out to be extremely small.
“However, attempts in measuring or giving a limit on the photon mass by observing the difference in the arriving time of photons with different frequencies emitted by the same source are disfavored, since for any reasonable value of a photon mass the effect turns out to be extremely small [53-55].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [53] de Broglie, L.: La Mécanique Ondulatoire du Photon. Une Nouvelle Théorie de la Lumière. Hermann & Cie, Paris (1940)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [54] Gintsburg, M.A.: Sov. Astron. 7, 536 (1964)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [55] Kobzarev, I.Y., Okun, L.B.: Sov. Phys. Usp. 11, 338 (1968) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
When ω ≫ m_A, the contribution of longitudinal photons to the total radiation is negligible.
“Therefore, when ω ≫ m A , the contribution of longitudinal photons to the total radiation is negligible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
Because of the very weak interaction of longitudinal photons with matter, approaching a statistical equilibrium state of longitudinal photons in a cavity is extremely slow, with a time-scale comparable to the age of the universe.
“Because of the very weak interaction of longitudinal photons with matter, approaching to a statistical equilibrium state of longitudinal photons in a cavity is extremely slow, with a time-scale comparable to the age of the universe [59-61].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationnone given§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13
The value of g depends on how the longitudinal photons interact with matter.
“However, the value of g depends on how the longitudinal photons interact with matter.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
According to [60], the practical impossibility for longitudinal photons to get equally partitioned with transverse photons in energy is due to the very large skin depth of longitudinal photons compared to that of transverse photons (with a ratio ≥ ω^2/m_A^2).
“According to [60], the practical impossibility for longitudinal photons to get equally partitioned with transverse photons in energy is due to the very large skin depth of longitudinal photons compared to that of transverse photons (with a ratio ≥ ω 2 /m 2 A ) [62, 63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
It is quite general that the contribution of m_A^2 to the radiation field is ∼ (m_A^2/k^2) × the dominant 1/r term as indicated in the dipole radiation case.
“Finally, we argue that it is quite general that the contribution of m 2 A to the radiation field is ∼ ( m 2 A /k 2 ) × the dominant 1 /r term as indicated in the dipole radiation case (eqs. 63 and 64).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
We cannot imagine any kind of electromagnetic radiation generated in lab or astrophysical conditions where longitudinal photons can have a detectable contribution.
“We cannot imagine any kind of electromagnetic radiation generated in lab or astrophysical conditions where longitudinal photons can have a detectable contribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13
When kT ≫ m_A c^2, the rest mass of photons can be ignored and the statistics approaches that of massless photons.
“When kT ≫ m A c 2 , the rest mass of photons can be ignored and the statistics approaches that of massless photons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13
When photons have an energy ħω ≫ m_A c^2, they interact with matter very weakly.
“Here we demonstrate that when photons have an energy ℏ ω ≫ m A c 2 they interact with matter very weakly by considering the electromagnetic radiation generated by an electric dipole p oscillating with a frequency ω .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
In a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the electromagnetic field tensor F_ab must vanish everywhere.
“As discussed in Secs. II and III, in a homogeneous and isotropic universe we must have F ab = 0 everywhere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe is homogeneous and isotropic.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16
When there is a cosmological constant Λ, the electromagnetic field equation (33) contains a photon mass term with m_A = (κΛ)^1/2, corresponding to a Compton wavelength comparable to the Hubble distance.
“In Sec. IV we have shown that when there is a cosmological constant Λ in the universe, the electromagnetic field equation (33) contains a photon mass term with m A = ( κ Λ) 1 / 2 , corresponding to a Compton wavelength comparable to the Hubble distance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
Even if the outside of an object is vacuum and Ricci-flat, the nonvanishing curvature-coupled term in the interior can still affect the structure of the electromagnetic field outside the object.
“Therefore, even if the outside of an object is vacuum and Ricci-flat, the nonvanishing curvature-coupled term in the interior of the object can still affect the structure of the electromagnetic field outside the object.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14
When kT ≪ m_A c^2, the statistics of massive photons become identical to that of a non-relativistic Bose gas with a degeneracy factor g = 3.
“Hence, when kT ≪ m A c 2 , the statistics of massive photons become identical to that of a non-relativistic Bose gas with a degeneracy factor g = 3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16
If an observer measures the electric field outside a charged ball and interprets the result with standard Gauss's law, the electric field appears as being generated by a total charge Q_ps.
“If an observer measures the electric field outside a charged ball and interprets the result with the standard Gauss's law, he will find that the electric field appears as being generated by a total charge”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16
If an observer measures the magnetic field outside a star and interprets the result with standard Ampere's circuital law, the magnetic field appears as being generated by a total current density inside the star.
“Similarly, if an observer measures the magnetic field outside a star and interprets the result with the standard Amp` ere's circuital law, he will find that the magnetic field appears as being generated by a total current density inside the star given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
In a homogeneous and isotropic universe, there is no electromagnetic force on the cosmological scale.
“However, as we have already demonstrated, in a homogeneous and isotropic universe F ab must vanish everywhere so there is no electromagnetic force on the cosmological scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe is homogeneous and isotropic.
- Interpretationcitation§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16
The above constraint on y is consistent with the result obtained in lab experiments if λ_A ∼ d_H ∼ 10^28 cm.
“The above constraint on the value of y is consistent with the result obtained in lab experiments if we take λ A ∼ d H ∼ 10 28 cm [31].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Bressi, G., et al.: Phys. Rev. A 83, 052101 (2011) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
The stress-energy tensor of the electromagnetic field arising from the net charge causes an attractive force, instead of a repulsive force according to Einstein's field equation.
“In fact, the stress-energy tensor of the electromagnetic field arising from the net charge causes an attractive force, instead of a repulsive force according to Einstein's field equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe has a mean net charge density ρ_e = χ ρ_m, where χ is the ratio of charge to mass.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
The stress-energy tensor of the electromagnetic field in a homogeneous and isotropic universe corresponds to a perfect fluid with mass density ρ_A and pressure P_A.
“corresponding to a perfect fluid with mass density ρ A and pressure P A defined by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe is homogeneous and isotropic.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16
Equation (33) indicates that local curvature of the background spacetime can affect electrodynamics.
“Equation (33) indicates that local curvature of the background spacetime can affect the electrodynamics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16
In a strongly curved spacetime, the effect of the curvature-coupled term may be measurable on scales comparable to the curvature radius of the spacetime.
“So, we can expect that, in a strongly curved spacetime, the effect of the curvature-coupled term may be measurable on scales comparable to the curvature radius of the spacetime.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
The parameter χ remains constant as the universe evolves.
“Since ρ m ∝ (1 + z ) 3 , by equation (73) the parameter χ remains a constant as the universe evolves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe has a mean net charge density ρ_e = χ ρ_m, where χ is the ratio of charge to mass.
- Premisecitation§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15
A constraint on the parameter χ can be converted to a constraint on the charge difference between electrons and protons, the charge of neutrons and neutrinos, and the asymmetry of matter and anti-matter.
“Hence, a constraint on the parameter χ can be converted to a constraint on the charge difference between electrons and protons, the charge of neutrons and neutrinos, and the asymmetry of matter and anti-matter [29, 30, 37].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
In the total stress-energy tensor of electromagnetic fields, only the (0)T_EM,ab part is accessible to experiments based on electromagnetic methods.
“In the total stress-energy tensor of electromagnetic fields, only the (0) T EM ,ab part is accessible to experiments based on electromagnetic methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
Objects clearly satisfying the criterion r_c ≲ r_A include neutron stars and the early universe.
“Objects clearly satisfying this criterion include neutron stars and the early universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 17
For a closed universe, Maxwell's equations always fail if the total charge in the universe is nonzero, without any requirement on spacetime symmetry and charge distribution (Type II Paradox).
“For a closed universe (i.e., a universe with a compact spatial section), Maxwell's equations always fail if the total charge in the universe is nonzero, without any requirement on spacetime symmetry and charge distribution (Type II Paradox).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18
The places where the effect of the curvature-coupled term in the new field equation and the Lagrangian can be detectable include the neighbor and interior of neutron stars, and the early universe.
“The places include the neighbor and interior of neutron stars, and the early universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
Equation (87) indicates that the curvature term in field equation (33) will lead to measurable effects if r_c ≲ r_A.
“Equation (87) indicates that the curvature term in the field equation (33) will lead to measurable effects if r c ≲ r A .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
In the very early universe, the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation should affect all electromagnetic processes on scales of the curvature radius of the early universe.
“The curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation should affect all the electromagnetic processes on scales of the curvature radius of the early universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In the very early time, the universe has a very high mass density and a very small curvature radius.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
In a strongly curved spacetime, the conservation of (0)T_EM,ab is affected by the presence of a pseudo-charge current.
“In a spacetime region that is strongly curved, the conservation of (0) T EM ,ab is affected by the presence of a pseudo-charge current, according to equation (89).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18
Due to the high mass density inside a neutron star, a pseudo-charge current arising from the curvature-coupled term can affect the structure of the magnetic field of a neutron star.
“Due to the high mass density present inside a neutron star, a pseudo-charge current arising from the curvaturecoupled term can affect the structure of the magnetic field of a neutron star.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A typical neutron star has radius r ≈ 10^6 cm and overall mass density ρ ≈ 5×10^14 g cm^-3.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
For a neutron star, the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation can produce detectable effects on its inside and outside magnetic fields.
“Therefore, for a neutron star, we expect that the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation can produce detectable effects on its inside and outside magnetic fields.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A typical neutron star has radius r ≈ 10^6 cm and overall mass density ρ ≈ 5×10^14 g cm^-3.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 17
Maxwell's equations cannot describe the electrodynamics of a homogeneous and isotropic universe with a uniformly distributed net charge, since in such a universe the electromagnetic field must be vanishing everywhere (Type I Paradox).
“Maxwell's equations cannot describe the electrodynamics of a homogeneous and isotropic universe with a uniformly distributed net charge, since in a homogeneous and isotropic universe the electromagnetic field must be vanishing everywhere (Type I Paradox).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The universe is homogeneous and isotropic.
- Interpretationnone given§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
Even where r_A ≪ r_c, the magnitude of (1)T_EM,ab can be comparable to that of (0)T_EM,ab.
“Even in a place where r A ≪ r c (hence the curvature terms in eq. 40 are small), the magnitude of (1) T EM ,ab can be comparable to that of (0) T EM ,ab .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
In the early universe when the gravity of radiation drives the expansion of the universe, the dark electromagnetic energy may play a very important role.
“In the early universe when the gravity of radiation drives the expansion of the universe, the dark electromagnetic energy may play a very important role.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18
In the early time when the universe is small, the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation affects all electromagnetic processes on scales comparable to the curvature radius of the universe.
“In the early time when the universe is small, the curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation affects all the electromagnetic processes on scales comparable to the curvature radius of the universe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In the very early time, the universe has a very high mass density and a very small curvature radius.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
If the interior of the object is strongly curved due to a large mass density, the effect of the pseudo-charge current density arising from the curvature-coupled term may be testable in measurements of the outside electromagnetic field.
“If the interior of the object is strongly curved due to the presence of a large mass density, the effect of the pseudo-charge current density arising from the curvature-coupled term may be testable in measurements of the outside electromagnetic field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17
The stress-energy tensor (0)T_EM,ab interacts with both the charge current J^a and the pseudo-charge current J^a_ps.
“In contrast, the stress-energy tensor (0) T EM ,ab (eqs. 19 and C4) interacts with both the charge current J a and the pseudo-charge current J a ps , since by equations (B5) and (33) we have”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 45
- The quote only partly states this claim. 5
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13If longitudinal photons interact with matter sufficiently weakly or do not interact with matter at all, we still get g = 2 and the Stephan-Boltzmann law remains valid.
“If they interact with matter sufficiently weak or do not interact with matter at all, we still get g = 2 and the Stephan-Boltzmann law remains valid [35, 36, 58].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [35] Tu, L.C., Luo, J., Gillies, G.T.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 77 (2005) source
- cites [36] Goldhaber, A.S., Nieto, M.M.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 939 (2010) source
Section II.F (p. 12) says that, with local charge conservation, longitudinal-photon coupling is suppressed as photon mass approaches zero and observable electromagnetic phenomena remain continuous in that limit. This supports the weak-interaction premise, but the paper also says a photon with nonzero mass has three polarization degrees of freedom; it does not state that g = 2 or address the Stefan–Boltzmann law. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [58] Schwabl, F.: Statistical Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2006) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15The present universe's matter content is dominantly composed of about 70% dark energy, about 30% cold dark matter and baryonic matter, and a very small fraction of radiation (about 10^-5 in mass density).
“Modern observations have confirmed that the matter content in the present universe is dominantly composed of about 70% dark energy (with P = -ρc 2 ), about 30% of cold dark matter and baryonic matter (with P ≪ ρc 2 ), and a very small fraction of radiation (about 10 -5 in mass density with P = ρc 2 / 3) [49, 50].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [49] Dunkley, J., et al.: 2009. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 306 (2009) source
Section 4.2.5 reports a present-day dark-energy density of ΩΛ = 0.742 ± 0.030, consistent with about 70%. Section 2.2 identifies baryons and cold dark matter as the other components of its flat ΛCDM model, consistent with roughly 30% combined. The passages on radiation in Section 4.2.1 discuss the early universe and matter–radiation equality, but do not give the claimed present-day radiation fraction of about 10^-5; the copy also does not state the radiation pressure relation. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [50] Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al., arXiv:1502.01589 (2015) source
The Conclusions (Table 4; page unavailable) give ΩΛ ≈ 0.69 and Ωm ≈ 0.31, consistent with the cited 70% dark energy and 30% matter. Section 6.3 gives the cosmological constant an equation of state of −1. The passages found on radiation, including Section 6.4.2, do not give a present-day radiation fraction of about 10^-5 or state the cited radiation-pressure relation. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16Given the very small value of a possible cosmological constant in the present universe, the effect of so small a photon mass may never be observable, unless the universe has a nonzero net charge.
“Given the very small value of a possible cosmological constant in the present universe [49, 50], the effect of a so small photon mass may never be observable, unless the universe has a nonzero net charge (Sec. VI).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1The curvature-coupled modification does not introduce a new dimensional parameter and returns to Maxwell's equations in a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime.
“This type of electromagnetic field equations do not introduce a new dimensional parameter and return to Maxwell's equations in a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime.”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
“In a Ricci-flat spacetime, including the flat spacetime as a special case, the curvature-coupled term disappears and the electromagnetic field equation returns to the Maxwell equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ II. FAILURE OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS ON COSMOLOGICAL SCALES · p. 6Maxwell's equations imply that inside any finite volume of a homogeneous and isotropic universe the total charge must be zero, conflicting with the assumption that the universe has a nonzero and uniformly distributed net charge.
“Hence, Maxwell's equations imply that inside any finite volume of a homogeneous and isotropic universe the total charge must be zero , conflicting with the assumption that the universe has a nonzero and uniformly distributed net charge.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7The trace of the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor defined by equations (18)-(20) is T_EM = -ξ A_a A^a / 4π, which is nonzero unless A_a is null.
“The trace of the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor defined by equations (18)-(20) is T EM = -ξA a A a / 4 π , which is nonzero unless A a is null.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7When ξ=0, the equation of charge conservation ∇_a J^a=0 is maintained if and only if equation (23), which is just the Lorentz gauge condition.
“When ξ = 0, the equation of charge conservation, ∇ a J a = 0, is maintained if and only if”
- Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8 · plain
“which is just the Lorentz gauge condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8 · plain
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7The stress-energy tensor (18) can be written as a sum of the ordinary Maxwell stress-energy tensor (19) and an additional stress-energy tensor (20) associated with the ξ A_a A^a term.
“is just the stress-energy tensor of electromagnetic fields in the ordinary Maxwell's theory, and”
- Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7 · plain
“is the additional stress-energy tensor associated with the ξA a A a term in the Lagrangian.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the solution A_a satisfies ∇_b A_a = ∇_a A_b and F_ab = 0, which guarantees it is consistent with the cosmological principle and solves equation (10).
“For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, ∇ b u a is just the extrinsic curvature tensor of the hypersurface defined by t = const. Therefore we have ∇ b A a = ∇ a A b and F ab = 0, which guarantees that the A a is consistent with the cosmological principle and solves the electromagnetic field equation (10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7Integrating equation (13) over volumes V1 and V2 in a compact space gives equation (14), which is not necessarily zero.
“Integrating equation (13) over the volume V 1 and V 2 in a compact space (Fig. 1) respectively, we get”
- Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7 · plain
“which is not necessarily zero.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7 · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8In the unitary gauge, φ_2 = 0, so the massless Goldstone bosons go away by a gauge transformation.
“Hence, in this unitary gauge [33, 34], we have φ 2 = 0. That is, the massless Goldstone bosons go away by a gauge transformation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9Equation (33) has the solution Φ = -(4π/ακ)ρ_e, i.e., A_a = -(4π/ακ)J_a.
“Equation (33) then has the following solution: Φ = -(4 π/ακ ) ρ e , i.e., A a = -(4 π/ακ ) J a .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9Variation with respect to A_a of the action with Lagrangian density (32) leads to the electromagnetic field equation (33), which contains a term with the potential vector A_a coupled to the Ricci tensor R_ab.
“Variation with respect to A a of the action with a Lagrangian density defined by equation (32) leads to the electromagnetic field equation”
- Also stated in: § IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9 · plain
“which contains a term with the potential vector A a coupled to the Ricci tensor R ab .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9 · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11Applying the 'minimal substitution rule' to equations (47) and (49) gives the corresponding equations in a curved spacetime (51).
“Now, applying the 'minimal substitution rule' to equations (47) and (49), we get the corresponding equations in a curved spacetime”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11Equation (51) is just equation (33) with κ = -2.
“which is just the equation (33) with κ = -2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8The mass of the vector field A_a (i.e., the mass of photons) is given by equation (31).
“The mass of the vector field A a (i.e., the mass of photons) is”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ A. Propagation time delay of photons with different energy · p. 12Taking λ_A ≳ 10^14 cm, we get Δt ≲ 10^-8 s for a radio source at a cosmological distance, making it almost impossible to detect the delay due to a nonzero photon mass by observing radio emissions of a gamma-ray burst or a quasar.
“Taking λ A ≳ 10 14 cm, we get ∆ t ≲ 10 -8 s for a radio source at a cosmological distance. This makes it almost impossible to detect the delay in the arriving time of photons due to a nonzero photon mass by observing the radio emissions of a gamma-ray burst or a quasar.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14Since ∂E/∂t ∼ -iωE and J = 0 outside the source, from equation (70) we derive equation (71).
“Since ∂ E /∂t ∼ -iω E and J = 0 outside the source, from equation (70) we derive that”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14For m_A ≲ 3.5 × 10^-52 g (corresponding to λ_A ≳ 10^14 cm) and ω = 10^12 Hz, we get m_A/ω ≲ 3 × 10^-16 and m_A^2/ω^2 ≲ 10^-31.
“For example, if m A ≲ 3 . 5 × 10 -52 g (corresponding to λ A ≳ 10 14 cm) and ω = 10 12 Hz (corresponding to the peak frequency of the cosmic microwave background) , we get m A /ω ≲ 3 × 10 -16 and m 2 A /ω 2 ≲ 10 -31 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13When ξ = m_A^2 = 0, a generalized Poynting flux vector is derived in Appendix C and given by equation (C14).
“When ξ = m 2 A = 0, a generalized Poynting flux vector is derived in Appendix C and given by equation (C14) (see also [59]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] Bass, L., Schrödinger, E.: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 232, 1 (1955) source
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14Equation (67) indicates that, in the radiation generated by an electric dipole, the power components in each photon spin state (s = 1, -1, and 0) have a ratio given by equation (68).
“Equation (67) indicates that, in the radiation generated by an electric dipole, the power components in each photon spin state ( s = 1 , -1, and 0) have a ratio”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14In a Minkowski spacetime, from equation (10) we can derive a generalized version of Ampère's circuital law in the differential form (70).
“In a Minkowski spacetime, from equation (10) we can derive a generalized version of Amp` ere's circuital law in the differential form”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13The magnetic field B has only transverse components (B·n = 0), while the electric field E has a longitudinal component E_∥ given by equation (65).
“The magnetic field B has only transverse components (i.e., B · n = 0). However, in addition to transverse components, the electric E has a longitudinal component E ‖ (i.e., E ‖ × n = 0) given by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14The power of the dipole radiation is given by the integration of S over a sphere of radius r, i.e., equation (67), and is independent of the radius r as demanded by the law of energy conservation.
“As expected, the power is independent of the radius r as demanded by the law of energy conservation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14Since |∇×B| ∼ k|B| and |B| = |∇×A| ∼ k|A|, by equation (71) we get |E|(from B) ∼ (k/ω)|B| ∼ (k^2/ω)|A|, and |E|(from m_A^2 A) ∼ (m_A^2/ω)|A|, so equation (72) holds.
“Since |∇ × B | ∼ k | B | and | B | = |∇ × A | ∼ k | A | , by equation (71) we get | E | (from B ) ∼ ( k/ω ) | B | ∼ ( k 2 /ω ) | A | , and | E | (from m 2 A A ) ∼ ( m 2 A /ω ) | A | . Therefore we have”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14When kT ≪ m_A c^2, we should have k^2 ≪ m_A^2 and ω^2 ≈ m_A^2.
“When kT ≪ m A c 2 we should have k 2 ≪ m 2 A and ω 2 ≈ m 2 A .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3A nonzero total charge can arise from several possibilities, including difference in the magnitude of electron and proton charges, nonvanishing charge of neutrons and neutrinos, and asymmetry of matter and antimatter.
“In fact, a nonzero total charge can arise from several possibilities, including difference in the magnitude of electron and proton charges, nonvanishing charge of neutrons and neutrinos, and asymmetry of matter and antimatter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6Since F_ab=0 in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, adding terms proportional to F_ab to the field equation does not help address the problem; the only possibility left, if keeping the equation linear in A_a, is to add a term proportional to A_a.
“Since F ab = 0 in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, inclusion of additional terms proportional to F ab in the field equation does not help to address the problem. Then, the only possibility left is to add a term proportional to A a to the field equation, if we want to keep the electromagnetic field equation linear in A a .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1The Proca-type modification is not the ultimate solution because photons lose their mass again when the symmetry is restored, and the paradoxes reappear.
“However, photons loose their mass again when the symmetry is restored, and the paradoxes reappear.”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
“we argue that it is not the ultimate solution since the photon mass disappears when the symmetry is restored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4The critical point in the principle of equivalence is that the region must be sufficiently small, much smaller than the radius of spacetime curvature, so that any curvature-coupled term can be ignored.
“The critical point in the statement of the principle of equivalence is that the region in the question must be sufficiently small: it must have a size much smaller than the radius of the spacetime curvature, so that any term in the law of physics inherently coupled to the spacetime curvature can be ignored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4In a region that is not small compared to the curvature radius of the spacetime, the principle of equivalence breaks down and the effect of a curvature-coupled term can be important.
“In a region that is not small compared to the curvature radius of the spacetime, the principle of equivalence breaks down and the effect of a curvature-coupled term can be important.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3There is a well-known ambiguity in the minimal substitution rule: if a law contains second-order derivative operators acting on a vector or tensor, the order of covariant derivative operators matters in curved spacetime, and exchange of the order causes the Riemann curvature tensor to appear; therefore generalization is determined only up to addition of a curvature-coupled term.
“There is a well-known ambiguity in this rule. If the law of physics contains second-order derivative operators acting on a vector or a tensor, the order of covariant derivative operators matters in a curved spacetime. In a curved spacetime, when a second-order derivative operator acts on a vector or a tensor, exchange of the order of derivative operators causes the presence of the Riemann curv”
- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
“Because of this ambiguity in the 'minimal substitution rule', generalization of a law of physics in a curved spacetime is determined only up to addition of a term coupled to the spacetime curvature.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3Maxwell's equations with a native photon mass term are not favored because they introduce a new and unusually small dimensional parameter (a photon mass).
“Maxwell's equations with a native photon mass term is not favored because they introduce a new and unusually small dimensional parameter (a photon mass).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8The model described by equations (25) and (26) is the curved spacetime version of the model in chapter 20.1 of Ref. [33].
“The model described by equations (25) and (26) is the curved spacetime version of the model in the chapter 20.1 of Ref. [33].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Peskin, M.E., Schroeder, D.V.: An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press, New York (1995) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 10When the electric charge is conserved, the Lorentz force equation (24) holds, so the electromagnetic force equation is not affected by the presence of a curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.
“When the electric charge is conserved, we get the Lorentz force equation (24). Hence, the electromagnetic force equation is not affected by the presence of a curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11An electromagnetic field equation in the form of (33) cannot be excluded since gauge invariance is not a physical principle.
“Although a requirement of gauge invariance picks up equation (3), an electromagnetic field equation in the form of (33) cannot be excluded since gauge invariance is not a physical principle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 10If the true field equation contains a term involving the spacetime curvature, the term is not present in a flat spacetime and cannot be recovered by the 'minimal substitution rule'.
“As a simple example, if the true field equation contains a term involving the spacetime curvature, the term is not present in a flat spacetime so cannot be recovered by the 'minimal substitution rule'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9In a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime, photons remain massless and gauge invariance is maintained.
“In particular, in a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime photons remain massless and the gauge invariance is maintained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9For a net charge uniformly distributed in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the cosmological principle requires F_ab=0, A_a=Φ(t)u_a, and J_a=ρ_e(t)u_a.
“For a net charge uniformly distributed in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the cosmological principle requires that F ab = 0, A a = Φ( t ) u a , and J a = ρ e ( t ) u a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8When the symmetry is restored in high energy states of φ, the electromagnetic field becomes massless again and the inconsistency problem reappears.
“When the symmetry is restored in high energy states of φ , the electromagnetic field becomes massless again and the inconsistency problem reappears.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12A much stronger but very speculative constraint comes from observations of the magnetic field on galactic scales, which is m_A < 10^-59 g, or λ_A > 3 × 10^21 cm.
“A much stronger but very speculative constraint comes from observations of the magnetic field on galactic scales, which is m A < 10 -59 g, or λ A > 3 × 10 21 cm [52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [52] Adelberger, E., Dvali, G., Gruzinov, A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010402 (2007) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ A. Propagation time delay of photons with different energy · p. 12An immediate consequence of a photon mass is the appearance of dispersion in the velocity of photons: bluer photons travel faster, and the velocity approaches c as the frequency of photons approaches infinity.
“An immediate consequence of a photon mass is the appearance of dispersion in the velocity of photons: bluer photons travel faster, and the velocity approaches c as the frequency of photons approaches infinity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13Massless photons obey the Bose-Einstein statistics and in the thermal equilibrium state have a spectrum of energy density given by the Planck radiation law (60).
“Massless photons obey the Bose-Einstein statistics and in the thermal equilibrium state have a spectrum of energy density given by the Planck radiation law”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12At present the most stringent and secure limit on the photon mass comes from the measurement of the magnetic field in the solar wind: m_A < 2 × 10^-51 g, or λ_A > 2 × 10^13 cm.
“At present the most stringent and secure limit on the photon mass comes from the measurement of the magnetic field in the solar wind: m A < 2 × 10 -51 g, or λ A > 2 × 10 13 cm [51].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] Ryutov, D.D.: Plasma Phys. Controll. Fusion 49, B429 (2007) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14The relation in equation (68) indicates that longitudinal and transverse photons are not statistically independent and do not have identical statistical weights.
“The relation in equation (68) indicates that longitudinal and transverse photons are not statistically independent and do not have identical statistical weights.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14When kT ≫ m_A c^2, for radiation containing both transverse and longitudinal photons, in the equilibrium state transverse photons have an energy spectrum determined by equation (60) with g = 2, and the spectrum of longitudinal photons should be jointly determined by the spectrum of transverse photons and the power ratio relation given by equation (68).
“So, when kT ≫ m A c 2 , we expect that for radiation containing both transverse and longitudinal photons, in the equilibrium state transverse photons have an energy spectrum determined by equation (60) with g = 2, and the spectrum of longitudinal photons should be jointly determined by the spectrum of transverse photons and the power ratio relation given by equation (68).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16The estimate of the constraint on y is based on the electromagnetic field equation (10) with a constant ξ.
“The estimate of the constraint on y presented above is based on the electromagnetic field equation (10) with a constant ξ .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14As T → 0, quantum effects become important and the Bose-Einstein condensation may occur.
“As T → 0, quantum effects become important and the Bose-Einstein condensation may occur [58].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Schwabl, F.: Statistical Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2006) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16The curvature term in equation (33) can be regarded as a pseudo-charge current density vector; its effect in generation of electromagnetic fields is equivalent to that of an electric charge current density.
“It is not a true electric charge current density, but its effect in generation of electromagnetic fields is equivalent to that of an electric charge current density.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoning§ C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16The constraints on y are based simply on comparison of ρ_A with the matter and radiation density in the universe.
“We also note that the above constraints are based simply on comparison of ρ A with the matter and radiation density in the universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18The Proca equation may never be testable if the presumed photon mass is incredibly small; the new field equation contains a curvature-coupled term whose effect is determined by the strength of the Ricci tensor, and in a strongly curved spacetime the effect can be important and measurable, so the new field equation (33) is testable.
“The Proca equation may never be testable, if the presumed photon mass is incredibly small. The new field equation contains a curvature-coupled term, whose effect is determined by the strength of the Ricci tensor. In a spacetime region that is strongly curved, the effect can be important and measurable. So, the new field equation (33) is testable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18Unlike the Proca equation, the new field equation does not introduce a new dimensional parameter; κ is a dimensionless constant of order unity.
“1. Unlike the Proca equation, the new field equation does not introduce a new dimensional parameter. In the Proca equation a photon mass is introduced as a fundamental constant. To be consistent with modern experiments and observations, the photon mass has to be incredibly small. In equation (33), the κ is a dimensionless constant of order unity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18The new field equation (33) is strongly motivated by generalization of the Maxwell equation in a flat spacetime to a curved spacetime, and is testable in a strongly curved spacetime region and in the early epoch of the universe.
“The new field equation is strongly motivated by consideration of generalization of the Maxwell equation in a flat spacetime to a curved spacetime, and is testable in a strongly curved spacetime region and in the early epoch of the universe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17Although (1)T_EM,ab does not interact with electric charges, it affects spacetime geometry through Einstein's field equations.
“Although (1) T EM ,ab does not interact with electric charges, it affects the spacetime geometry through Einstein's field equations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17The extra stress-energy tensor (1)T_EM,ab only interacts with the pseudo-charge current; it represents a type of dark electromagnetic energy and momentum and does not interact with electric charges and currents.
“The (1) T EM ,ab only interacts with the pseudo-charge current. Hence, the extra stress-energy tensor (1) T EM ,ab represents a type of dark electromagnetic energy and momentum. It does not interact with electric charges and currents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18The new field equation (33) can address the paradoxes and has advantages over the Proca equation.
“The new field equation can also address the paradoxes and has the following advantages over the Proca equation:”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18In a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime, the new field equation returns to the Maxwell equation and gauge invariance is restored.
“In a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime, the new field equation returns to the Maxwell equation and gauge invariance is restored.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18In a spacetime with a cosmological constant, the curvature-coupled term in the new field equation contains a photon mass term determined by the cosmological constant; in this sense the new field equation implies the Proca equation and is more fundamental.
“In a spacetime with a cosmological constant, the curvature-coupled term in the new field equation contains a photon mass term, where the photon mass is determined by the cosmological constant. In this sense, the new field equation implies the Proca equation and hence is more fundamental than the Proca equation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18The dark electromagnetic energy associated with the curvature-coupled term in the Lagrangian may also play an important role in driving the expansion of the universe.
“The dark electromagnetic energy associated with the curvature-coupled term in the Lagrangian may also play an important role in driving the expansion of the universe.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18The new field equation has a strong motivation from the 'minimal substitution rule' and can naturally arise from the Maxwell equation when generalized to a curved spacetime with that rule.
“The new field equation has a strong motivation from the 'minimal substitution rule', as discussed in details in Sec. V. It can naturally arise from the Maxwell equation when the Maxwell equation is generalized to a curved spacetime with the 'minimal substitution rule'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
A non-empty universe must not be Ricci-flat.
“Since a non-empty universe must not be Ricci-flat, the paradoxes can be addressed by the inclusion of a curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For the investigation of consequences of a nonzero photon mass, m_A = ξ^{1/2} is taken to be a constant.
“For simplicity, we assume that m A = ξ 1 / 2 is a constant.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For the discussion of statistical mechanics of massive photons, the background spacetime is taken to be Minkowski.
“To be specific, we assume that the background spacetime is a Minkowski spacetime.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The universe has a mean net charge density ρ_e = χ ρ_m, where χ is the ratio of charge to mass.
“where ρ m is the mean mass density, and the dimensionless parameter χ is the ratio of charge to mass in the universe.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A proton has charge (1+y)|e| with |y|≪1.
“Assuming that a proton has a charge (1 + y ) | e | , where | y |≪ 1.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The matter inside an object is described by the stress-energy tensor T_ab = ρ u_a u_b, ignoring the cosmological constant.
“let us ignore the cosmological constant and assume that the matter inside an object is described by a stress-energy tensor T ab = ρu a u b , where ρ is the mass density of the matter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A typical neutron star has radius r ≈ 10^6 cm and overall mass density ρ ≈ 5×10^14 g cm^-3.
“A typical neutron star has a radius r ≈ 10 6 cm and an overall mass density ρ ≈ 5 × 10 14 g cm -3 , corresponding to a curvature radius r c ≈ 10 6 cm by equation (86).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The universe is homogeneous and isotropic.
“For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, all quantities are functions of the cosmic time t .”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The universe contains an equal number of electrons and protons.
“For a universe containing an equal number of electrons and protons, the total net charge density in the universe at any redshift z is given by”
The paper relies on this without support.
The radiation density scales as ρ_r ∝ (1+z)^4.
“where we have used the fact that the density of radiation ρ r ∝ (1 + z ) 4 .”
The paper relies on this without support.
In the very early time, the universe has a very high mass density and a very small curvature radius.
“In the very early time, the universe has a very high mass density and a very small curvature radius.”
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106 · see citing works
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589 · Cited by 10,720
Bekenstein, J. D. (1973) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.2333 · Cited by 7,555 · see citing works
Wald, R. M. (1984) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 · Cited by 7,188 · see citing works
HAWKING, S. W. (1974) · Nature · doi:10.1038/248030a0 · Cited by 5,669 · see citing works
The four laws of black hole mechanics
Bardeen, J. M., Carter, B., & Hawking, S. W. (1973) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01645742 · Cited by 3,932 · see citing works
Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation
Gibbons, G. W., & Hawking, S. W. (1977) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2738 · Cited by 3,192 · see citing works
A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae
Hubble, E. (1929) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.15.3.168 · Cited by 2,553 · see citing works
<i>An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory</i>
Peskin, M. E., Schroeder, D. V., & Martinec, E. (1996) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2807734 · Cited by 2,244 · see citing works
Weinberg, S. (2008) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198526827.001.0001 · Cited by 1,876 · see citing works
Dunkley, J., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Larson, D., Hinshaw, G., Page, L., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Jarosik, N., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/306 · Cited by 1,787 · see citing works
Ryder, L. H. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813900 · Cited by 1,281 · see citing works
Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model
Schwartz, M. D. (2013) · doi:10.1017/9781139540940 · Cited by 1,256 · see citing works
Photon and graviton mass limits
Goldhaber, A. S., & Nieto, M. M. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.939 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Terrestrial and Extraterrestrial Limits on The Photon Mass
GOLDHABER, A. S., & NIETO, M. M. (1971) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.43.277 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Binney, J. J., Tremaine, S. D., & Donald Lynden-bell, A. (1988) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2811635 · Cited by 308
Tu, L.-C., Luo, J., & Gillies, G. T. (2005) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/68/1/r02 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Principles of Physical Cosmology
Peebles, P. J. E., & Harrison, E. (1994) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17585 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Schwabl, F. (2006) · Advanced Texts in Physics · doi:10.1007/3-540-36217-7 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
<i>The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time</i>
Hawking, S. W., Ellis, G. F. R., & Sachs, R. K. (1974) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3128542 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Electromagnetic fields in curved spacetimes
Tsagas, C. G. (2005) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/2/011 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Entropy and the Time Evolution of Macroscopic Systems
Grandy, W. T. (2008) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546176.001.0001 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Newtonian and relativistic cosmologies
Green, S., & Wald, R. M. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.063512 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Bass, L., & Schrodinger, E. (1955) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1955.0197 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Using plasma physics to weigh the photon
Ryutov, D. D. (2007) · Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · doi:10.1088/0741-3335/49/12b/s40 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Ueber das Newton'sche Gravitationsgesetz
Seeliger, H. (1895) · Astronomische Nachrichten · doi:10.1002/asna.18951370902 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Physical consequences of a general excess of charge
Lyttleton, R. A., & Bondi, H. (1959) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1959.0155 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
A gravitational entropy proposal
Clifton, T., Ellis, G. F. R., & Tavakol, R. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/12/125009 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Photon-Mass Bound Destroyed by Vortices
Adelberger, E., Dvali, G., & Gruzinov, A. (2007) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.010402 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The Cosmological Woes of Newtonian Gravitation Theory
Norton, J. D. (1999) · Birkhäuser Boston eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0639-2_8 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Constraints on the electrical charge asymmetry of the universe
Caprini, C., & Ferreira, P. G. (2005) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2005/02/006 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
An experimental limit on the charge of antihydrogen
Amole, C., Ashkezari, M. D., Baquero-Ruiz, M., et al. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4955 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Testing the neutrality of matter by acoustic means in a spherical resonator
Bressi, G., Carugno, G., Della Valle, F., Galeazzi, G., Ruoso, G., & Sartori, G. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.052101 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Why does the Jeans Swindle work?
Falco, M., Hansen, S. H., Wojtak, R., et al. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls051 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Magnetic Tension and the Geometry of the Universe
Tsagas, C. G. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5421 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Orito, S., & Yoshimura, M. (1985) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.54.2457 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Newtonian versus relativistic cosmology
Flender, S., & Schwarz, D. J. (2012) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.063527 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Carvalho, C. A. D., & Rosa, S. G. (1980) · Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/13/10/020 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Theoretical Interpretation of a Recent Experimental Investigation of the Photon Rest Mass
Kroll, N. M. (1971) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.26.1395 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Kobzarev, I. Y., & Okun', L. B. (1968) · Soviet Physics Uspekhi · doi:10.1070/pu1968v011n03abeh003838 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Constraints on cosmic electric charge asymmetry and neutrino charge from the microwave background
Sengupta, S., & Pal, P. B. (1996) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(95)01261-3 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Time, laws, and the future of cosmology
Smolin, L. (2014) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/pt.3.2310 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
On the possible consequences of a variability of the elementary charge
HOYLE, F. (1960) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1960.0162 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Gravitational entropy of local cosmic voids
Sussman, R. A., & Larena, J. (2015) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/16/165012 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Primordial helium production in a charged universe
Massó, E., & Rota, F. (2002) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02636-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Photon mass and electrogenesis
Dolgov, A. D., & Pelliccia, D. N. (2007) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.05.004 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Homogeneous and isotropic charge densities to accelerate the universe
Brisudova, M., Kinney, W. H., & Woodard, R. P. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/18/311 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
<i>Quantum Fields in Curved Space</i>
Birrell, N., Davies, P., & Wald, R. (1983) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2915453 · Cited by 8
Lyttleton, R. A., & Bondi, H. (1960) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1960.0163 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Barry, G. W. (1974) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/152872 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Thermodynamics: With Quantum Statistical Illustrations
Landsberg, P. T., Prigogine, I., & Rice, S. A. (1961) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3057284
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Thomson, W.: Macmillan’s Mag. 5, 388 (1862)
- Smith, C., Wise, M.N.: Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
- Planck, M.: Treatise on Thermodynamics, 1917th edn. Dover Publications, New York (2010)
- Neumann, C.: Abh. d. Kgl. Sächs. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Leipzig, math.-nat. KL. 26, 97 (1874). This is cited from R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962). However, see the comments in [14]
- Jeans, J.H.: Astronomy and Cosmogony. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1929)
- Weinberg, S.: Gravitation and Cosmology. Wiley, New York (1972)
- de Broglie, L.: La Mécanique Ondulatoire du Photon. Une Nouvelle Théorie de la Lumière. Hermann & Cie, Paris (1940)
- Gintsburg, M.A.: Sov. Astron. 7, 536 (1964)
- Mohling, F.: Statistical Mechanics: Methods and Applications. Wiley, New York (1983)
- Stueckelberg, E.C.G.: Helv. Phys. Acta 30, 209 (1957)
- Gertsenshtein, M.E., Solovei, L.G.: JETP Lett. 9, 79 (1969)
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Li, L.-X.
- Affiliations
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Li-Xin
- Venue
- General Relativity and Gravitation
- Published
- 2016-02-24
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0001-7701 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9532
- OpenAlex
- W2122524752
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- General Relativity and Gravitation (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- modified Maxwell equations, photon mass, Proca equation, spontaneous symmetry breaking, Higgs mechanism, Goldstone bosons, homogeneous isotropic universe, neutron stars, early universe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review