Cited by 5Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Electrodynamics on cosmological scales

Open access
Li, Li-Xin·2016·General Relativity and Gravitation

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper argues that Maxwell’s equations fail on cosmological scales for a universe with a net charge, especially in a closed universe, and proposes curvature-coupled modified Maxwell equations as a more fundamental fix than a Proca photon-mass term. The modification returns to Maxwell’s equations in Ricci-flat spacetime and may be testable in neutron-star interiors and the early universe.

Key findings

  • Maxwell’s equations cannot describe a homogeneous and isotropic universe with a uniformly distributed net charge: the field tensor must vanish, forcing the current to vanish (Type I Paradox). In a closed universe with nonzero net charge, Maxwell’s equations always fail regardless of spacetime symmetry or charge distribution (Type II Paradox).
  • A Proca-type modification with a \(-\xi A_a\) term can resolve the paradoxes, with photon mass \(m_A=\xi^{1/2}\), but the mass disappears when symmetry is restored and the paradoxes reappear.
  • A curvature-coupled equation containing \(\kappa R^a{}_b A^b\) also resolves the paradoxes, introduces only a dimensionless \(\kappa\), returns to Maxwell’s equations when \(R_{ab}=0\), and with a cosmological constant reduces to a Proca equation with \(\xi=\kappa\Lambda\) and \(m_A=(\kappa\Lambda)^{1/2}\), corresponding to \(\lambda_A\sim 10^{28}\) cm.
  • Consequences include a photon-mass time delay \(\Delta t\lesssim 10^{-8}\) s for \(\lambda_A\gtrsim 10^{14}\) cm, charge-excess constraints \(\chi<2.1\,d_H/\lambda_A\) from \(\rho_A<\rho_m\) and \(\chi<0.01\,d_H/\lambda_A\) from \(\rho_A<\rho_r\), and testability when \(r_c\lesssim r_A\), e.g., neutron stars with \(r\approx 10^6\) cm, \(\rho\approx 5\times 10^{14}\) g cm\(^{-3}\), and \(r_c\approx 10^6\) cm, and the early universe.

Methods

  • Theoretical general-relativistic derivation: covariant Maxwell equations, Gauss’s law on spacelike hypersurfaces, and compact spatial sections are used to prove the Type I and Type II paradoxes.
  • Modified field equations are constructed from Lagrangians: a Proca/Higgs-mechanism photon-mass term and a curvature-coupled term; stress-energy tensors, charge conservation, Lorentz force, and Poynting flux are derived.
  • Existing photon-mass limits and cosmological parameters are used for estimates, including \(\Omega_m=0.3\), \(\Omega_b=0.043\), \(h=0.7\), \(\Omega_r=4.2\times 10^{-5}h^{-2}\), and \(z=1100\); no new observational data are analyzed.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the Proca solution is not ultimate because symmetry restoration removes the photon mass and the paradoxes return; curvature-coupled effects may be unobservable in the present universe unless there is a net charge or strong curvature.
  • The paper states that the charge constraints assume a constant \(\xi\) and rely on simple comparisons of \(\rho_A\) with matter and radiation densities; more complex analyses, such as CMB temperature fluctuations, may give stronger constraints.
  • Evident from the text: no direct experimental detection or observational confirmation is presented, and testability is argued only for extreme environments such as neutron-star interiors and the early universe.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10714-016-2028-3

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

12 of 56 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6

    When ξ is positive, equation (10) is equivalent to the Proca equation.

    “When ξ is positive, this equation is equivalent to the Proca equation [34-36] and m A ≡ ξ 1 / 2 can be interpreted as the rest mass of photons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [34] Ryder, L.H.: Quantum Field Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996) source
    • cites [35] Tu, L.C., Luo, J., Gillies, G.T.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 77 (2005) source
    • cites [36] Goldhaber, A.S., Nieto, M.M.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 939 (2010) source

      Section B (p. 5) describes the Proca modification of Maxwell’s equations as giving the photon a nonzero rest mass. The equations in our copy are not decoded, however, and the text does not identify the citing paper’s equation (10) or its parameter ξ. It therefore supports the general Proca–photon-mass connection, but not the stated equivalence under ξ > 0. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6

    m_A ≡ ξ^{1/2} can be interpreted as the rest mass of photons.

    “When ξ is positive, this equation is equivalent to the Proca equation [34-36] and m A ≡ ξ 1 / 2 can be interpreted as the rest mass of photons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [34] Ryder, L.H.: Quantum Field Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996) source
    • cites [35] Tu, L.C., Luo, J., Gillies, G.T.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 77 (2005) source
    • cites [36] Goldhaber, A.S., Nieto, M.M.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 939 (2010) source

      “Photon mass from the Proca equation” (pp. 5–6) says that Proca’s modification can give the photon a nonzero rest mass. The passages do not define ξ or establish that √ξ is that mass, so the specific identification is not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisenone given
    § V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11

    There is no observational or experimental evidence for gauge invariance of electromagnetic fields in a curved spacetime with a nonvanishing Ricci curvature.

    “We also remark that there is no observational or experimental evidence for gauge invariance of electromagnetic fields in a curved spacetime with a nonvanishing Ricci curvature.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36] Goldhaber, A.S., Nieto, M.M.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 939 (2010) source

      The discussion of gauge invariance (p. 9) calls the symmetry unobservable, but does not assess observational or experimental evidence for electromagnetic gauge invariance in curved spacetime. Searches for Ricci curvature and tests in curved spacetime found no passage addressing the claim’s specific setting. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [48] Schwartz, M.D.: Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013) source
  • Findingreasoning
    § VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12

    If there exists a cosmological constant as current observations indicated, the κR^b_a A^a term in equation (33) gives rise to a photon mass m_A = (κΛ)^{1/2}, corresponding to λ_A ∼ 10^28 cm (the size of the cosmic horizon).

    “For example, as mentioned in Sec. IV, if there exists a cosmological constant as current observations indicated [49, 50], the κR b a A a term in equation (33) gives rise to a photon mass m A = ( κ Λ) 1 / 2 , corresponding to λ A ∼ 10 28 cm (the size of the cosmic horizon).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] Dunkley, J., et al.: 2009. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 306 (2009) source
    • cites [50] Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al., arXiv:1502.01589 (2015) source
  • Findingreasoning
    § C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16

    The requirement Ω_A < Ω_m provides a first constraint on the value of y.

    “The requirement that ω A ( z = 0) = Ω A &lt; Ω m provides the first constraint on the value of y”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] Dunkley, J., et al.: 2009. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 306 (2009) source

      Section 3.2.2 discusses measurements involving Ω_m, but does not state Ω_A < Ω_m or connect that inequality to a constraint on y. Searches for the inequality and the proposed constraint found no passage addressing them in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [50] Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al., arXiv:1502.01589 (2015) source

      Section 5.2 reports a measured value of Ω_m, but it does not discuss Ω_A or a parameter y. Searches for the stated inequality and for Ω_A as a constraint on y found no passage establishing that relationship or calling it a first constraint. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • The authors state this as an assumption: A proton has charge (1+y)|e| with |y|≪1.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The universe contains an equal number of electrons and protons.
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13

    If longitudinal photons interact with matter sufficiently weakly or do not interact with matter at all, we still get g = 2 and the Stephan-Boltzmann law remains valid.

    “If they interact with matter sufficiently weak or do not interact with matter at all, we still get g = 2 and the Stephan-Boltzmann law remains valid [35, 36, 58].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [35] Tu, L.C., Luo, J., Gillies, G.T.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 77 (2005) source
    • cites [36] Goldhaber, A.S., Nieto, M.M.: Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 939 (2010) source

      Section II.F (p. 12) says that, with local charge conservation, longitudinal-photon coupling is suppressed as photon mass approaches zero and observable electromagnetic phenomena remain continuous in that limit. This supports the weak-interaction premise, but the paper also says a photon with nonzero mass has three polarization degrees of freedom; it does not state that g = 2 or address the Stefan–Boltzmann law. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [58] Schwabl, F.: Statistical Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2006) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 15

    The present universe's matter content is dominantly composed of about 70% dark energy, about 30% cold dark matter and baryonic matter, and a very small fraction of radiation (about 10^-5 in mass density).

    “Modern observations have confirmed that the matter content in the present universe is dominantly composed of about 70% dark energy (with P = -ρc 2 ), about 30% of cold dark matter and baryonic matter (with P ≪ ρc 2 ), and a very small fraction of radiation (about 10 -5 in mass density with P = ρc 2 / 3) [49, 50].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] Dunkley, J., et al.: 2009. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 306 (2009) source

      Section 4.2.5 reports a present-day dark-energy density of ΩΛ = 0.742 ± 0.030, consistent with about 70%. Section 2.2 identifies baryons and cold dark matter as the other components of its flat ΛCDM model, consistent with roughly 30% combined. The passages on radiation in Section 4.2.1 discuss the early universe and matter–radiation equality, but do not give the claimed present-day radiation fraction of about 10^-5; the copy also does not state the radiation pressure relation. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [50] Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al., arXiv:1502.01589 (2015) source

      The Conclusions (Table 4; page unavailable) give ΩΛ ≈ 0.69 and Ωm ≈ 0.31, consistent with the cited 70% dark energy and 30% matter. Section 6.3 gives the cosmological constant an equation of state of −1. The passages found on radiation, including Section 6.4.2, do not give a present-day radiation fraction of about 10^-5 or state the cited radiation-pressure relation. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16

    Given the very small value of a possible cosmological constant in the present universe, the effect of so small a photon mass may never be observable, unless the universe has a nonzero net charge.

    “Given the very small value of a possible cosmological constant in the present universe [49, 50], the effect of a so small photon mass may never be observable, unless the universe has a nonzero net charge (Sec. VI).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [49] Dunkley, J., et al.: 2009. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180, 306 (2009) source
    • cites [50] Planck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud et al., arXiv:1502.01589 (2015) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1

    The curvature-coupled modification does not introduce a new dimensional parameter and returns to Maxwell's equations in a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime.

    “This type of electromagnetic field equations do not introduce a new dimensional parameter and return to Maxwell's equations in a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime.”
    • Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
      “In a Ricci-flat spacetime, including the flat spacetime as a special case, the curvature-coupled term disappears and the electromagnetic field equation returns to the Maxwell equation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § II. FAILURE OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS ON COSMOLOGICAL SCALES · p. 6

    Maxwell's equations imply that inside any finite volume of a homogeneous and isotropic universe the total charge must be zero, conflicting with the assumption that the universe has a nonzero and uniformly distributed net charge.

    “Hence, Maxwell's equations imply that inside any finite volume of a homogeneous and isotropic universe the total charge must be zero , conflicting with the assumption that the universe has a nonzero and uniformly distributed net charge.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7

    The trace of the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor defined by equations (18)-(20) is T_EM = -ξ A_a A^a / 4π, which is nonzero unless A_a is null.

    “The trace of the electromagnetic stress-energy tensor defined by equations (18)-(20) is T EM = -ξA a A a / 4 π , which is nonzero unless A a is null.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7

    When ξ=0, the equation of charge conservation ∇_a J^a=0 is maintained if and only if equation (23), which is just the Lorentz gauge condition.

    “When ξ = 0, the equation of charge conservation, ∇ a J a = 0, is maintained if and only if”
    • Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8 · plain
      “which is just the Lorentz gauge condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7

    The stress-energy tensor (18) can be written as a sum of the ordinary Maxwell stress-energy tensor (19) and an additional stress-energy tensor (20) associated with the ξ A_a A^a term.

    “is just the stress-energy tensor of electromagnetic fields in the ordinary Maxwell's theory, and”
    • Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7 · plain
      “is the additional stress-energy tensor associated with the ξA a A a term in the Lagrangian.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7

    For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the solution A_a satisfies ∇_b A_a = ∇_a A_b and F_ab = 0, which guarantees it is consistent with the cosmological principle and solves equation (10).

    “For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, ∇ b u a is just the extrinsic curvature tensor of the hypersurface defined by t = const. Therefore we have ∇ b A a = ∇ a A b and F ab = 0, which guarantees that the A a is consistent with the cosmological principle and solves the electromagnetic field equation (10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7

    Integrating equation (13) over volumes V1 and V2 in a compact space gives equation (14), which is not necessarily zero.

    “Integrating equation (13) over the volume V 1 and V 2 in a compact space (Fig. 1) respectively, we get”
    • Also stated in: § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 7 · plain
      “which is not necessarily zero.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8

    In the unitary gauge, φ_2 = 0, so the massless Goldstone bosons go away by a gauge transformation.

    “Hence, in this unitary gauge [33, 34], we have φ 2 = 0. That is, the massless Goldstone bosons go away by a gauge transformation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [33] Peskin, M.E., Schroeder, D.V.: An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press, New York (1995) source
    • cites [34] Ryder, L.H.: Quantum Field Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9

    Equation (33) has the solution Φ = -(4π/ακ)ρ_e, i.e., A_a = -(4π/ακ)J_a.

    “Equation (33) then has the following solution: Φ = -(4 π/ακ ) ρ e , i.e., A a = -(4 π/ακ ) J a .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9

    Variation with respect to A_a of the action with Lagrangian density (32) leads to the electromagnetic field equation (33), which contains a term with the potential vector A_a coupled to the Ricci tensor R_ab.

    “Variation with respect to A a of the action with a Lagrangian density defined by equation (32) leads to the electromagnetic field equation”
    • Also stated in: § IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9 · plain
      “which contains a term with the potential vector A a coupled to the Ricci tensor R ab .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning
    § V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11

    Applying the 'minimal substitution rule' to equations (47) and (49) gives the corresponding equations in a curved spacetime (51).

    “Now, applying the 'minimal substitution rule' to equations (47) and (49), we get the corresponding equations in a curved spacetime”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning
    § V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11

    Equation (51) is just equation (33) with κ = -2.

    “which is just the equation (33) with κ = -2.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8

    The mass of the vector field A_a (i.e., the mass of photons) is given by equation (31).

    “The mass of the vector field A a (i.e., the mass of photons) is”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § A. Propagation time delay of photons with different energy · p. 12

    Taking λ_A ≳ 10^14 cm, we get Δt ≲ 10^-8 s for a radio source at a cosmological distance, making it almost impossible to detect the delay due to a nonzero photon mass by observing radio emissions of a gamma-ray burst or a quasar.

    “Taking λ A ≳ 10 14 cm, we get ∆ t ≲ 10 -8 s for a radio source at a cosmological distance. This makes it almost impossible to detect the delay in the arriving time of photons due to a nonzero photon mass by observing the radio emissions of a gamma-ray burst or a quasar.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    Since ∂E/∂t ∼ -iωE and J = 0 outside the source, from equation (70) we derive equation (71).

    “Since ∂ E /∂t ∼ -iω E and J = 0 outside the source, from equation (70) we derive that”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    For m_A ≲ 3.5 × 10^-52 g (corresponding to λ_A ≳ 10^14 cm) and ω = 10^12 Hz, we get m_A/ω ≲ 3 × 10^-16 and m_A^2/ω^2 ≲ 10^-31.

    “For example, if m A ≲ 3 . 5 × 10 -52 g (corresponding to λ A ≳ 10 14 cm) and ω = 10 12 Hz (corresponding to the peak frequency of the cosmic microwave background) , we get m A /ω ≲ 3 × 10 -16 and m 2 A /ω 2 ≲ 10 -31 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13

    When ξ = m_A^2 = 0, a generalized Poynting flux vector is derived in Appendix C and given by equation (C14).

    “When ξ = m 2 A = 0, a generalized Poynting flux vector is derived in Appendix C and given by equation (C14) (see also [59]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [59] Bass, L., Schrödinger, E.: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 232, 1 (1955) source
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    Equation (67) indicates that, in the radiation generated by an electric dipole, the power components in each photon spin state (s = 1, -1, and 0) have a ratio given by equation (68).

    “Equation (67) indicates that, in the radiation generated by an electric dipole, the power components in each photon spin state ( s = 1 , -1, and 0) have a ratio”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    In a Minkowski spacetime, from equation (10) we can derive a generalized version of Ampère's circuital law in the differential form (70).

    “In a Minkowski spacetime, from equation (10) we can derive a generalized version of Amp` ere's circuital law in the differential form”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13

    The magnetic field B has only transverse components (B·n = 0), while the electric field E has a longitudinal component E_∥ given by equation (65).

    “The magnetic field B has only transverse components (i.e., B · n = 0). However, in addition to transverse components, the electric E has a longitudinal component E ‖ (i.e., E ‖ × n = 0) given by”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    The power of the dipole radiation is given by the integration of S over a sphere of radius r, i.e., equation (67), and is independent of the radius r as demanded by the law of energy conservation.

    “As expected, the power is independent of the radius r as demanded by the law of energy conservation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    Since |∇×B| ∼ k|B| and |B| = |∇×A| ∼ k|A|, by equation (71) we get |E|(from B) ∼ (k/ω)|B| ∼ (k^2/ω)|A|, and |E|(from m_A^2 A) ∼ (m_A^2/ω)|A|, so equation (72) holds.

    “Since |∇ × B | ∼ k | B | and | B | = |∇ × A | ∼ k | A | , by equation (71) we get | E | (from B ) ∼ ( k/ω ) | B | ∼ ( k 2 /ω ) | A | , and | E | (from m 2 A A ) ∼ ( m 2 A /ω ) | A | . Therefore we have”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    When kT ≪ m_A c^2, we should have k^2 ≪ m_A^2 and ω^2 ≈ m_A^2.

    “When kT ≪ m A c 2 we should have k 2 ≪ m 2 A and ω 2 ≈ m 2 A .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3

    A nonzero total charge can arise from several possibilities, including difference in the magnitude of electron and proton charges, nonvanishing charge of neutrons and neutrinos, and asymmetry of matter and antimatter.

    “In fact, a nonzero total charge can arise from several possibilities, including difference in the magnitude of electron and proton charges, nonvanishing charge of neutrons and neutrinos, and asymmetry of matter and antimatter.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 6

    Since F_ab=0 in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, adding terms proportional to F_ab to the field equation does not help address the problem; the only possibility left, if keeping the equation linear in A_a, is to add a term proportional to A_a.

    “Since F ab = 0 in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, inclusion of additional terms proportional to F ab in the field equation does not help to address the problem. Then, the only possibility left is to add a term proportional to A a to the field equation, if we want to keep the electromagnetic field equation linear in A a .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Electrodynamics on Cosmological Scales · p. 1

    The Proca-type modification is not the ultimate solution because photons lose their mass again when the symmetry is restored, and the paradoxes reappear.

    “However, photons loose their mass again when the symmetry is restored, and the paradoxes reappear.”
    • Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
      “we argue that it is not the ultimate solution since the photon mass disappears when the symmetry is restored.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4

    The critical point in the principle of equivalence is that the region must be sufficiently small, much smaller than the radius of spacetime curvature, so that any curvature-coupled term can be ignored.

    “The critical point in the statement of the principle of equivalence is that the region in the question must be sufficiently small: it must have a size much smaller than the radius of the spacetime curvature, so that any term in the law of physics inherently coupled to the spacetime curvature can be ignored.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 4

    In a region that is not small compared to the curvature radius of the spacetime, the principle of equivalence breaks down and the effect of a curvature-coupled term can be important.

    “In a region that is not small compared to the curvature radius of the spacetime, the principle of equivalence breaks down and the effect of a curvature-coupled term can be important.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3

    There is a well-known ambiguity in the minimal substitution rule: if a law contains second-order derivative operators acting on a vector or tensor, the order of covariant derivative operators matters in curved spacetime, and exchange of the order causes the Riemann curvature tensor to appear; therefore generalization is determined only up to addition of a curvature-coupled term.

    “There is a well-known ambiguity in this rule. If the law of physics contains second-order derivative operators acting on a vector or a tensor, the order of covariant derivative operators matters in a curved spacetime. In a curved spacetime, when a second-order derivative operator acts on a vector or a tensor, exchange of the order of derivative operators causes the presence of the Riemann curv”
    • Also stated in: § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3 · plain
      “Because of this ambiguity in the 'minimal substitution rule', generalization of a law of physics in a curved spacetime is determined only up to addition of a term coupled to the spacetime curvature.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3

    Maxwell's equations with a native photon mass term are not favored because they introduce a new and unusually small dimensional parameter (a photon mass).

    “Maxwell's equations with a native photon mass term is not favored because they introduce a new and unusually small dimensional parameter (a photon mass).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8

    The model described by equations (25) and (26) is the curved spacetime version of the model in chapter 20.1 of Ref. [33].

    “The model described by equations (25) and (26) is the curved spacetime version of the model in the chapter 20.1 of Ref. [33].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Peskin, M.E., Schroeder, D.V.: An Introduction To Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press, New York (1995) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 10

    When the electric charge is conserved, the Lorentz force equation (24) holds, so the electromagnetic force equation is not affected by the presence of a curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.

    “When the electric charge is conserved, we get the Lorentz force equation (24). Hence, the electromagnetic force equation is not affected by the presence of a curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 11

    An electromagnetic field equation in the form of (33) cannot be excluded since gauge invariance is not a physical principle.

    “Although a requirement of gauge invariance picks up equation (3), an electromagnetic field equation in the form of (33) cannot be excluded since gauge invariance is not a physical principle.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § V. MOTIVATIONS FOR THE CURVATURE-COUPLED ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EQUATION · p. 10

    If the true field equation contains a term involving the spacetime curvature, the term is not present in a flat spacetime and cannot be recovered by the 'minimal substitution rule'.

    “As a simple example, if the true field equation contains a term involving the spacetime curvature, the term is not present in a flat spacetime so cannot be recovered by the 'minimal substitution rule'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9

    In a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime, photons remain massless and gauge invariance is maintained.

    “In particular, in a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime photons remain massless and the gauge invariance is maintained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § IV. EFFECTIVE ξ -TERM FROM SPACETIME CURVATURE COUPLING · p. 9

    For a net charge uniformly distributed in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the cosmological principle requires F_ab=0, A_a=Φ(t)u_a, and J_a=ρ_e(t)u_a.

    “For a net charge uniformly distributed in a homogeneous and isotropic universe, the cosmological principle requires that F ab = 0, A a = Φ( t ) u a , and J a = ρ e ( t ) u a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § III. MODIFICATION OF MAXWELL'S EQUATIONS · p. 8

    When the symmetry is restored in high energy states of φ, the electromagnetic field becomes massless again and the inconsistency problem reappears.

    “When the symmetry is restored in high energy states of φ , the electromagnetic field becomes massless again and the inconsistency problem reappears.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12

    A much stronger but very speculative constraint comes from observations of the magnetic field on galactic scales, which is m_A < 10^-59 g, or λ_A > 3 × 10^21 cm.

    “A much stronger but very speculative constraint comes from observations of the magnetic field on galactic scales, which is m A &lt; 10 -59 g, or λ A &gt; 3 × 10 21 cm [52].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52] Adelberger, E., Dvali, G., Gruzinov, A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 010402 (2007) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § A. Propagation time delay of photons with different energy · p. 12

    An immediate consequence of a photon mass is the appearance of dispersion in the velocity of photons: bluer photons travel faster, and the velocity approaches c as the frequency of photons approaches infinity.

    “An immediate consequence of a photon mass is the appearance of dispersion in the velocity of photons: bluer photons travel faster, and the velocity approaches c as the frequency of photons approaches infinity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 13

    Massless photons obey the Bose-Einstein statistics and in the thermal equilibrium state have a spectrum of energy density given by the Planck radiation law (60).

    “Massless photons obey the Bose-Einstein statistics and in the thermal equilibrium state have a spectrum of energy density given by the Planck radiation law”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § VI. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF THE MODIFIED ELECTRODYNAMICS · p. 12

    At present the most stringent and secure limit on the photon mass comes from the measurement of the magnetic field in the solar wind: m_A < 2 × 10^-51 g, or λ_A > 2 × 10^13 cm.

    “At present the most stringent and secure limit on the photon mass comes from the measurement of the magnetic field in the solar wind: m A &lt; 2 × 10 -51 g, or λ A &gt; 2 × 10 13 cm [51].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51] Ryutov, D.D.: Plasma Phys. Controll. Fusion 49, B429 (2007) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    The relation in equation (68) indicates that longitudinal and transverse photons are not statistically independent and do not have identical statistical weights.

    “The relation in equation (68) indicates that longitudinal and transverse photons are not statistically independent and do not have identical statistical weights.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    When kT ≫ m_A c^2, for radiation containing both transverse and longitudinal photons, in the equilibrium state transverse photons have an energy spectrum determined by equation (60) with g = 2, and the spectrum of longitudinal photons should be jointly determined by the spectrum of transverse photons and the power ratio relation given by equation (68).

    “So, when kT ≫ m A c 2 , we expect that for radiation containing both transverse and longitudinal photons, in the equilibrium state transverse photons have an energy spectrum determined by equation (60) with g = 2, and the spectrum of longitudinal photons should be jointly determined by the spectrum of transverse photons and the power ratio relation given by equation (68).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16

    The estimate of the constraint on y is based on the electromagnetic field equation (10) with a constant ξ.

    “The estimate of the constraint on y presented above is based on the electromagnetic field equation (10) with a constant ξ .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § B. Statistical mechanics of massive photons · p. 14

    As T → 0, quantum effects become important and the Bose-Einstein condensation may occur.

    “As T → 0, quantum effects become important and the Bose-Einstein condensation may occur [58].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] Schwabl, F.: Statistical Mechanics. Springer, Berlin (2006) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 16

    The curvature term in equation (33) can be regarded as a pseudo-charge current density vector; its effect in generation of electromagnetic fields is equivalent to that of an electric charge current density.

    “It is not a true electric charge current density, but its effect in generation of electromagnetic fields is equivalent to that of an electric charge current density.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § C. Constraint on the net charge in the universe and the charge difference between electrons and protons · p. 16

    The constraints on y are based simply on comparison of ρ_A with the matter and radiation density in the universe.

    “We also note that the above constraints are based simply on comparison of ρ A with the matter and radiation density in the universe.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    The Proca equation may never be testable if the presumed photon mass is incredibly small; the new field equation contains a curvature-coupled term whose effect is determined by the strength of the Ricci tensor, and in a strongly curved spacetime the effect can be important and measurable, so the new field equation (33) is testable.

    “The Proca equation may never be testable, if the presumed photon mass is incredibly small. The new field equation contains a curvature-coupled term, whose effect is determined by the strength of the Ricci tensor. In a spacetime region that is strongly curved, the effect can be important and measurable. So, the new field equation (33) is testable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    Unlike the Proca equation, the new field equation does not introduce a new dimensional parameter; κ is a dimensionless constant of order unity.

    “1. Unlike the Proca equation, the new field equation does not introduce a new dimensional parameter. In the Proca equation a photon mass is introduced as a fundamental constant. To be consistent with modern experiments and observations, the photon mass has to be incredibly small. In equation (33), the κ is a dimensionless constant of order unity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    The new field equation (33) is strongly motivated by generalization of the Maxwell equation in a flat spacetime to a curved spacetime, and is testable in a strongly curved spacetime region and in the early epoch of the universe.

    “The new field equation is strongly motivated by consideration of generalization of the Maxwell equation in a flat spacetime to a curved spacetime, and is testable in a strongly curved spacetime region and in the early epoch of the universe.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17

    Although (1)T_EM,ab does not interact with electric charges, it affects spacetime geometry through Einstein's field equations.

    “Although (1) T EM ,ab does not interact with electric charges, it affects the spacetime geometry through Einstein's field equations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VII. ON THE TESTABILITY OF THE FIELD EQUATION (33) · p. 17

    The extra stress-energy tensor (1)T_EM,ab only interacts with the pseudo-charge current; it represents a type of dark electromagnetic energy and momentum and does not interact with electric charges and currents.

    “The (1) T EM ,ab only interacts with the pseudo-charge current. Hence, the extra stress-energy tensor (1) T EM ,ab represents a type of dark electromagnetic energy and momentum. It does not interact with electric charges and currents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    The new field equation (33) can address the paradoxes and has advantages over the Proca equation.

    “The new field equation can also address the paradoxes and has the following advantages over the Proca equation:”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    In a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime, the new field equation returns to the Maxwell equation and gauge invariance is restored.

    “In a flat or Ricci-flat spacetime, the new field equation returns to the Maxwell equation and gauge invariance is restored.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    In a spacetime with a cosmological constant, the curvature-coupled term in the new field equation contains a photon mass term determined by the cosmological constant; in this sense the new field equation implies the Proca equation and is more fundamental.

    “In a spacetime with a cosmological constant, the curvature-coupled term in the new field equation contains a photon mass term, where the photon mass is determined by the cosmological constant. In this sense, the new field equation implies the Proca equation and hence is more fundamental than the Proca equation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    The dark electromagnetic energy associated with the curvature-coupled term in the Lagrangian may also play an important role in driving the expansion of the universe.

    “The dark electromagnetic energy associated with the curvature-coupled term in the Lagrangian may also play an important role in driving the expansion of the universe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VIII. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 18

    The new field equation has a strong motivation from the 'minimal substitution rule' and can naturally arise from the Maxwell equation when generalized to a curved spacetime with that rule.

    “The new field equation has a strong motivation from the 'minimal substitution rule', as discussed in details in Sec. V. It can naturally arise from the Maxwell equation when the Maxwell equation is generalized to a curved spacetime with the 'minimal substitution rule'.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
60 of 60
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A non-empty universe must not be Ricci-flat.

    “Since a non-empty universe must not be Ricci-flat, the paradoxes can be addressed by the inclusion of a curvature-coupled term in the electromagnetic field equation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    For the investigation of consequences of a nonzero photon mass, m_A = ξ^{1/2} is taken to be a constant.

    “For simplicity, we assume that m A = ξ 1 / 2 is a constant.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    For the discussion of statistical mechanics of massive photons, the background spacetime is taken to be Minkowski.

    “To be specific, we assume that the background spacetime is a Minkowski spacetime.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The universe has a mean net charge density ρ_e = χ ρ_m, where χ is the ratio of charge to mass.

    “where ρ m is the mean mass density, and the dimensionless parameter χ is the ratio of charge to mass in the universe.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A proton has charge (1+y)|e| with |y|≪1.

    “Assuming that a proton has a charge (1 + y ) | e | , where | y |≪ 1.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The matter inside an object is described by the stress-energy tensor T_ab = ρ u_a u_b, ignoring the cosmological constant.

    “let us ignore the cosmological constant and assume that the matter inside an object is described by a stress-energy tensor T ab = ρu a u b , where ρ is the mass density of the matter.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A typical neutron star has radius r ≈ 10^6 cm and overall mass density ρ ≈ 5×10^14 g cm^-3.

    “A typical neutron star has a radius r ≈ 10 6 cm and an overall mass density ρ ≈ 5 × 10 14 g cm -3 , corresponding to a curvature radius r c ≈ 10 6 cm by equation (86).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The universe is homogeneous and isotropic.

    “For a homogeneous and isotropic universe, all quantities are functions of the cosmic time t .”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The universe contains an equal number of electrons and protons.

    “For a universe containing an equal number of electrons and protons, the total net charge density in the universe at any redshift z is given by”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The radiation density scales as ρ_r ∝ (1+z)^4.

    “where we have used the fact that the density of radiation ρ r ∝ (1 + z ) 4 .”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the very early time, the universe has a very high mass density and a very small curvature radius.

    “In the very early time, the universe has a very high mass density and a very small curvature radius.”
11 of 11

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Thomson, W.: Macmillan’s Mag. 5, 388 (1862)
  2. Smith, C., Wise, M.N.: Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
  3. Planck, M.: Treatise on Thermodynamics, 1917th edn. Dover Publications, New York (2010)
  4. Neumann, C.: Abh. d. Kgl. Sächs. Ges. d. Wiss. zu Leipzig, math.-nat. KL. 26, 97 (1874). This is cited from R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmology, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962). However, see the comments in [14]
  5. Jeans, J.H.: Astronomy and Cosmogony. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1929)
  6. Weinberg, S.: Gravitation and Cosmology. Wiley, New York (1972)
  7. de Broglie, L.: La Mécanique Ondulatoire du Photon. Une Nouvelle Théorie de la Lumière. Hermann & Cie, Paris (1940)
  8. Gintsburg, M.A.: Sov. Astron. 7, 536 (1964)
  9. Mohling, F.: Statistical Mechanics: Methods and Applications. Wiley, New York (1983)
  10. Stueckelberg, E.C.G.: Helv. Phys. Acta 30, 209 (1957)
  11. Gertsenshtein, M.E., Solovei, L.G.: JETP Lett. 9, 79 (1969)

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Li, L.-X.
Affiliations
Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Li-Xin
Venue
General Relativity and Gravitation
Published
2016-02-24
Volume
48
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 0001-7701 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9532
OpenAlex
W2122524752
Cited by
5
References
51
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General Relativity and Gravitation (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
modified Maxwell equations, photon mass, Proca equation, spontaneous symmetry breaking, Higgs mechanism, Goldstone bosons, homogeneous isotropic universe, neutron stars, early universe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review