Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 584

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Self-dissociation and protonic charge transport in water and

Eigen, Manfred, De Maeyer, L.·1958·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Abstract

A comprehensive survey on experimental techniques, results and theoretical interpretations concerning the self-dissociation and protonic charge transport in water and ice is given. Recent investigations of fast protolytic reactions in pure water and aqueous solutions by means of relaxation techniques complete our knowledge about state and kinetic properties of the proton in this medium. In comparison here with our experience regarding the same properties in ice crystals are far less complete, as usual techniques of aqueous solutions are not applicable. Direct measurements of individual properties of ‘excess’ and ‘defect’ protons in ice (mobilities, concentrations, reaction rates) are presented. The proton transport in hydrogen-bonded media is completely different from normal ionic migration and corresponds more to electronic transport processes in semi-conductors. Generally the proton transport through hydrogen bonds includes two processes: (1) The formation (or rearrangement) of (H-bond) structure with orientation, favourable for a proton transition, and (2) the charge transfer within the H bond. The first step is rate determining in water, whereas the second one is decisive for the charge transport in ice. The requirements for a theoretical treatment therefore are (1) for water: a theory of ‘structural diffusion’ of the H-bonded hydration complex of H3O+, and (2) for ice: a (quantum-mechanical) theory of the protonic motion within the potential well of the H bond. The mechanism of structural diffusion provides an explanation of the anomalous H3O+ and OH- mobility and their recombination rate in water. The difference between protonic and normal ionic charge transport occurs most obviously in the absolute values of mobilities in ice. The proton mobility in ice differs by many orders of magnitude from that of normal ions, but only by a factor of about 50 from electronic mobilities in some metals and semi-conductors. Further arguments, demonstrating the analogy between protonic and electronic charge transport are given. The reaction kinetics of protolytic systems and the fast proton transport in H-bonded systems are of certain importance with respect to biological problems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1958.0208

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 584

Metadata

Authors
Eigen, M., & De Maeyer, L.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Published
1958-10-21
Volume
247
Issue
1251
Pages
505-533
ISSN
  • 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9169
OpenAlex
W1990271282
Cited by
584
References
0
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self-dissociation and protonic charge transport in water and. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1958.0208
The paper
Eigen, M., & De Maeyer, L. (1958). Self-dissociation and protonic charge transport in water and. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0208

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.