Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 695

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gravitational waves in general relativity. VI. The outgoing radiation condition

Sachs, R.·1961·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Abstract

A covariant formulation of the outgoing radiation condition for gravitational fields is proposed. The condition is based on a detailed examination of the geometry of null lines and of the algebraic and differential properties of the Riemann tensor. It relates the absence of incoming radiation, in a gravitational field with bounded sources and Euclidean topology, to the asymptotic behaviour of the Riemann tensor. Fields that are algebraically special in the Petrov classification are highly special examples of fields obeying the suggested condition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1961.0202

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sachs, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Published
1961-11-21
Volume
264
Issue
1318
Pages
309-338
ISSN
  • 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9169
OpenAlex
W1992541079
Cited by
695
References
0
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.