The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disintegration of water drops in an electric field
Abstract
The disintegration of drops in strong electric fields is believed to play an important part in the formation of thunderstorms, at least in those parts of them where no ice crystals are present. Zeleny showed experimentally that disintegration begins as a hydrodynamical instability, but his ideas about the mechanics of the situation rest on the implicit assumption that instability occurs when the internal pressure is the same as that outside the drop. It is shown that this assumption is false and that instability of an elongated drop would not occur unless a pressure difference existed. When this error is corrected it is found that a drop, elongated by an electric field, becomes unstable when its length is 1.9 times its equatorial diameter, and the calculated critical electric field agrees with laboratory experiments to within 1 %. When the drop becomes unstable the ends develop obtuse-angled conical points from which axial jets are projected but the stability calculations give no indication of the mechanics of this process. It is shown theoretically that a conical interface between two fluids can exist in equilibrium in an electric field, but only when the cone has a semi-vertical angle 49.3°. Apparatus was constructed for producing the necessary field, and photographs show that conical oil/water interfaces and soap films can be produced at the calculated voltage and that their semi-vertical angles are very close to 49.3°. The photographs give an indication of how the axial jets are produced but no complete analytical description of the process is attempted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry: Approaches, Advances, and Applications
Yates, J. R., Ruse, C. I., & Nakorchevsky, A. (2009) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-061008-124934 · Cited by 1,078
New developments in biochemical mass spectrometry: electrospray ionization
Smith, R. D., Loo, J. A., Edmonds, C. G., Barinaga, C. J., & Udseth, H. R. (1990) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac00208a002 · Cited by 1,051
Experimental investigation of the governing parameters in the electrospinning of polymer solutions
Theron, S. A., Zussman, E., & Yarin, A. L. (2004) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.024 · Cited by 1,021
Taylor cone and jetting from liquid droplets in electrospinning of nanofibers
Yarin, A. L., Koombhongse, S., & Reneker, D. H. (2001) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1408260 · Cited by 894
MOF positioning technology and device fabrication
Falcaro, P., Ricco, R., Doherty, C. M., Liang, K., Hill, A. J., & Styles, M. J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00089g · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, G. I.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1964-07-28
- Volume
- 280
- Issue
- 1382
- Pages
- 383-397
- ISSN
- 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9169
- OpenAlex
- W2167699112
- Cited by
- 3,305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disintegration of water drops in an electric field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1964.0151
- The paper
- Taylor, G. I. (1964). Disintegration of water drops in an electric field. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1964.0151
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.