Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 530

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An experimental investigation of fluid flow resulting from the impact of a water drop with an unyielding dry surface

Stow, C. D., Hadfield, M. G.·1981·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Abstract

The flow of fluid associated with the impact of water drops of radius R at a speed V onto unyielding dry metal surfaces of known roughness Ra is described. Spatial dimensions of the deforming drop are normalized by transformations of the kind x' — x/R, and time scales are normalized according to t' = tV/R, to permit comparison of events where or differ. It is shown that the primary influence of the surface roughness parameter Ra is the determination of the condition for the ejection of secondary droplets by the excitation of an instability in the developing watersheet; provided Ra≪ R, it is possible to evaluate the condition to a high degree of accuracy, and for Ra = 0.84 μm it is found to be α4/3RV1.69 > 7.4, where α is the eccentricity of the drop at the moment of impact. Deceleration of the drop apex does not commence until > 0.6, contrary to the prediction of Engel (1955) but in good agreement with that of Savic & Boult (1957). Close examination of the very early stages of impact suggests strongly that the so-called watersheet originates at a moment t' — 0.01 after first contact, regardless of the absolute values of R, V or Ra; the initial normalized watersheet velocity is of order 5. Where there is ejected material, its normalized velocity at the moment of ejection is of the order of 20 % greater than that of the watersheet substrate. Simple calculations also suggest that initial fluid velocities greater than 10 are required immediately before the initiation of the watersheet (t'< 0.01). Impacts at speeds considerably greater than the appropriate terminal fall speed in air show no deviations in character from those investigated at much lower speeds. A simple subsidiary experiment also suggests that greater impact velocities are required to produce splashing on inclined targets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1981.0002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 530

Metadata

Authors
Stow, C. D., & Hadfield, M. G.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Published
1981-01-07
Volume
373
Issue
1755
Pages
419-441
ISSN
  • 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9169
OpenAlex
W1993383901
Cited by
530
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An experimental investigation of fluid flow resulting from the impact of a water drop with an unyielding dry surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1981.0002
The paper
Stow, C. D., & Hadfield, M. G. (1981). An experimental investigation of fluid flow resulting from the impact of a water drop with an unyielding dry surface. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1981.0002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.