The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The rheology of suspensions of solid particles
Open accessAbstract
We present data for the rheology of suspensions of monodisperse particles of varying aspect ratio, from oblate to prolate, and covering particle volume fractions ϕ from dilute to highly concentrated. Rheology is characterized by fitting the experimental data to the model of Herschel & Bulkley (Herschel & Bulkley 1926 Kolloid Z. 39 , 291–300 ( doi:10.1007/BF01432034 )) yielding three rheometric parameters: consistency K (cognate with viscosity); flow index n (a measure of shear-thinning); yield stress τ 0 . The consistency K of suspensions of particles of arbitrary aspect ratio can be accurately predicted by the model of Maron & Pierce (Maron & Pierce 1956 J. Colloid Sci. 11 , 80–95 ( doi:10.1016/0095-8522(56)90023-X )) with the maximum packing fraction ϕ m as the only fitted parameter. We derive empirical relationships for ϕ m and n as a function of average particle aspect ratio r p and for τ 0 as a function of ϕ m and a fitting parameter τ *. These relationships can be used to predict the rheology of suspensions of prolate particles from measured ϕ and r p . By recasting our data in terms of the Einstein coefficient, we relate our rheological observations to the underlying particle motions via Jeffery’s (Jeffery 1922 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 102 , 161–179 ( doi:10.1098/rspa.1922.0078 )) theory. We extend Jeffery’s work to calculate, numerically, the Einstein coefficient for a suspension of many, initially randomly oriented particles. This provides a physical, microstructural explanation of our observations, including transient oscillations seen during run start-up and changes of rheological regime as ϕ increases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials
Foster, E. J., Moon, R. J., Agarwal, U. P., Bortner, M. J., Bras, J., Camarero-Espinosa, S., Chan, K. J., Clift, M. J. D., Cranston, E. D., Eichhorn, S. J., et al. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00895j · Cited by 1,021
Tang, J., Zhao, X., Li, J., Guo, R., Zhou, Y., & Liu, J. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b10256 · Cited by 357
How volcanoes work: A 25 year perspective
Cashman, K. V., & Sparks, R. S. J. (2013) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30720.1 · Cited by 287
Dynamics of Cellulose Nanocrystal Alignment during 3D Printing
Hausmann, M. K., Rühs, P. A., Siqueira, G., Läuger, J., Libanori, R., Zimmermann, T., & Studart, A. R. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b02366 · Cited by 282
3D food printing: main components selection by considering rheological properties
Jiang, H., Zheng, L., Zou, Y., Tong, Z., Han, S., & Wang, S. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2018.1514363 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, S., Llewellin, E. W., & Mader, H. M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2009-12-16
- Volume
- 466
- Issue
- 2116
- Pages
- 1201-1228
- ISSN
- 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2946
- OpenAlex
- W2151822993
- Cited by
- 898
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rheology of suspensions of solid particles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.2009.0445
- The paper
- Mueller, S., Llewellin, E. W., & Mader, H. M. (2010). The rheology of suspensions of solid particles. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2009.0445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.