The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit
Open accessAbstract
Data-driven discovery of dynamics via machine learning is pushing the frontiers of modelling and control efforts, providing a tremendous opportunity to extend the reach of model predictive control (MPC). However, many leading methods in machine learning, such as neural networks (NN), require large volumes of training data, may not be interpretable, do not easily include known constraints and symmetries, and may not generalize beyond the attractor where models are trained. These factors limit their use for the online identification of a model in the low-data limit, for example following an abrupt change to the system dynamics. In this work, we extend the recent sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDY) modelling procedure to include the effects of actuation and demonstrate the ability of these models to enhance the performance of MPC, based on limited, noisy data. SINDY models are parsimonious, identifying the fewest terms in the model needed to explain the data, making them interpretable and generalizable. We show that the resulting SINDY-MPC framework has higher performance, requires significantly less data, and is more computationally efficient and robust to noise than NN models, making it viable for online training and execution in response to rapid system changes. SINDY-MPC also shows improved performance over linear data-driven models, although linear models may provide a stopgap until enough data is available for SINDY. SINDY-MPC is demonstrated on a variety of dynamical systems with different challenges, including the chaotic Lorenz system, a simple model for flight control of an F8 aircraft, and an HIV model incorporating drug treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow
Lorenz, E. N. (1963) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:dnf>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 19,398
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
Detecting strange attractors in turbulence
Takens, F. (1981) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0091924 · Cited by 10,459 · cited 1×
“mited measurements. It has recently been shown that delay coordinates provide a useful embedding to identify simple models of chaotic systems [41], building on the celebrated Takens embedding theorem [77]. Delay coordinates also define intrinsic coordinates for the Koopman operator [41], which provides a simple linear…”
MethodAn introduction to computing with neural nets
Lippmann, R. (1987) · IEEE ASSP Magazine · doi:10.1109/massp.1987.1165576 · Cited by 7,825
Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data
SCHMID, P. J. (2010) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/s0022112010001217 · Cited by 5,915
Model predictive control: Theory and practice—A survey
García, C. E., Prett, D. M., & Morari, M. (1989) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(89)90002-2 · Cited by 5,284
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems
Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1517384113 · Cited by 4,796
Self-citationDistilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data
Schmidt, M., & Lipson, H. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165893 · Cited by 2,890
Cited by
Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations
Champion, K., Lusch, B., Kutz, J. N., & Brunton, S. L. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906995116 · Cited by 909
Self-citationCheng, S., Quilodrán-Casas, C., Ouala, S., Farchi, A., Liu, C., Tandeo, P., Fablet, R., Lucor, D., Iooss, B., Brajard, J., et al. (2023) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2023.123537 · Cited by 303
Discovery of nonlinear multiscale systems: Sampling strategies and embeddings
Champion, K. P., Brunton, S. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2019) · SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems · doi:10.1137/18m1188227 · Cited by 171
Self-citationIdentification of nonlinear dynamical systems with time delay
Leylaz, G., Wang, S., & Sun, J.-Q. (2022) · International Journal of Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1007/s40435-021-00783-7 · Cited by 35
Advances in monitoring and control of refolding kinetics combining PAT and modeling
Pauk, J. N., Raju Palanisamy, J., Kager, J., Koczka, K., Berghammer, G., Herwig, C., & Veiter, L. (2021) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-021-11151-y · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaiser, E., Kutz, J. N., & Brunton, S. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 474
- Issue
- 2219
- Pages
- 20180335-20180335
- ISSN
- 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2946
- OpenAlex
- W2768748954
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.2018.0335
- The paper
- Kaiser, E., Kutz, J. N., & Brunton, S. L. (2018). Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for model predictive control in the low-data limit. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0335
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.