Cited by 0Architecture and Art History StudiesHistory and Theory of MathematicsMathematics and Applications

Conformality in Hawksmoor's ceiling, the Roman Pantheon and Mercator's projection

Open access
Cardy, John·2026·Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Science

Abstract

The dome of the Roman Pantheon is coffered with ribs surrounding sunken lacunaria, thus forming a grid. How this is achieved given the curvature of the dome has long been a subject for study and speculation. Although detailed measurements now exist, thus far no single principle has emerged which fixes the overall geometry. Similar coffering occurs in Hawksmoor's design for the ceiling of the Buttery in All Souls College, Oxford. Both these examples are doubly curved, making their tiling with (almost) square coffers problematic. We address this using methods of differential geometry. Observing that the ribs intersect orthogonally, we hypothesize that they are images under a conformal (angle preserving) mapping of a uniform M×N tiling of a planar rectangle with squares. This is unique and is the inverse of Mercator's projection of the ceiling to the rectangle. It minimizes an energy functional which captures the sum of the elastic and gravitational energies in the long wavelength limit. Thus, any construction method which is stable to long wavelength deformations necessarily leads to a conformal coffering. This then gives quantitative predictions with no adjustable parameters for the relative sizes and locations of each coffer, which are in good agreement with photographic data, and consistent with direct measurements of the Pantheon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.2026.0076

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Cardy, J.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Cardy, John
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Science
Published
2026-10-07
Volume
482
Issue
2347
ISSN
  • 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2946
OpenAlex
W7117710599
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Architecture and Art History Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Theoretical Computer Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Mathematics and Applications
Keywords
Roman pantheon, Hawksmoor, Mercator projection, conformal mapping, differential geometry, double-curved surfaces, elastic energy, gravitational energy, energy minimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review