Cited by 10Architecture and Art History Studies3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageHistorical and Architectural Studies

Geometrical Analysis of the Coffers of the Pantheon’s Dome in Rome

Open access
Aliberti, Licinia, Alonso-Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel·2017·Nexus Network Journal

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper uses digital photogrammetry and 3D laser scanning to compare the Pantheon dome’s surveyed soffit with an ideal spherical model, analyzing the 28 coffer sectors and five levels. It finds surprising overall regularity but also localized irregularities, especially along the North–South axis, and argues the coffers were adjusted empirically rather than by rigid geometric construction.

Key findings

  • The average ideal sphere has a radius of 22.03 m, and its centre is calculated at −0.37 m behind the cornice line. Comparing survey points to the ideal surface, 72.5% fall within a 10 cm tolerance, 21% are under 15 cm, and 6.5% are over this measure; a depression is detected along the North–South axis.
  • The 28-sector radial layout is highly accurate: angles between coffer-sector bisectors are close to 12°50′ (12.85°), with an average deviation of barely 0°36′. The sector opposite the entry portal is parallel to the North–South axis at 15 cm; quadrants I and III are perfectly aligned, while quadrants II and IV are not, with maximum divergence of 39 cm.
  • Coffer dimensions decrease progressively upward: average vertical arcs follow the progression 0.93, 0.86, 0.75, 0.60 from level A to E; bottom widths fall from 3.88 m to 2.38 m, upper widths from 3.77 m to 2.02 m, and heights from 4.08 m to 2.39 m. The North–South sector’s first-level coffer A1 measures 4.00 m at its lower part, versus 3.83–3.94 m for others.
  • Intermediate and deepest coffer surfaces tend to be flat rather than spherical, with raised points only 2–3 cm from a flat average surface. From the centre of the room at 1.70 m height, the coffers appear almost square, and the inner levels change from horizontal to vertical rectangles; the design seems not to depend on a single projection point.

Methods

  • A contemporary double survey was developed using digital photogrammetry and a three-dimensional laser scan, producing a point cloud of the dome’s soffit.
  • An ideal model was constructed from an average sphere based on survey-point coordinates, divided into 28 equal sectors and five coffer levels, then compared with the survey model using average calculations, vector-drawing graphical tools, orthogonal projections, and perspective projections.
  • Detailed dimensional analysis focused on the North-East quadrant, using sectors 2–6 to calculate average coffer widths, heights, depths, horizontal bands, vertical separations, and transition-surface alignments.

Limitations

  • The paper states that results are based on the current state of the coffers registered by the point cloud, which may have been slightly modified by the cladding restoration works of Terenzio (1933) and Belardi (2006), especially for the smallest surfaces.
  • The paper states that exact definition of transition-surface directions is difficult because the connecting planes are much shorter than the entire dome, and that the complex coffer design has yet to be analysed and understood in all details.
  • Evident from the text: detailed dimensional analysis is concentrated on one quadrant (North-East, sectors 2–6), so variation across all 28 sectors is not fully quantified; thermal expansion was excluded by choice, though the paper argues thermal inertia makes this reasonable.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00004-017-0339-7

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 19 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The sectors of quadrants II and IV are not aligned with their opposites.

    “However, the sectors of quadrants II and IV are not aligned with their opposites.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The slight divergence recorded between the first three internal surfaces measures a maximum of 4 cm.

    “The slight divergence recorded between the first three internal surfaces measures a maximum of 4 cm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    From the third level to the fifth, the inner figure is a vertical rectangle.

    “From the third level to the fifth, the inner figure is a vertical rectangle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The six opposing coffer sectors of quadrants I and III are perfectly aligned.

    “If we observe the alignment between the sectors of quadrants I and III, we can see that the six opposing coffer sectors are perfectly aligned.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The greatest decrease in depth appears in the last surface.

    “It is evident that the greatest decrease in depth appears in the last surface.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • May combine two claims. 28
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Fernandez-Cabo (2013) used the drawings of Rondelet (1860) to carry out his research.

    “In the Nexus Network Journal, Fernandez-Cabo (2013) stressed this evidence and eventually used the drawings of Rondelet (1860) to carry out his research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fernandez-Cabo (2013) source
    • cites Rondelet (1860)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In analysing the direction of the transition surfaces between the different levels, the radial tracings were identified, and other tracings approximately converged into certain reference points outside the coffers.

    “In analysing the direction of the transition surfaces between the different levels, the radial tracings were identified, and other tracings approximately converged into certain reference points outside the coffers (Fig. 11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The upper circumference of the last level of the coffers shows a greater inclination than the average value and is directed towards the North direction.

    “The upper circumference of the last level of the coffers shows a greater inclination than the average value, and it is directed towards the North direction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The coffer of the first level of the North-South axis sector opposite the entrance portal (A1) measures 4.00 m in its lower part, whereas the rest of coffers measure A2 3.90 m, A3 3.94 m, A4 3.86 m, A5 3.83 m, A6 3.86 m, A7 3.85 m, and A8 3.92 m.

    “(the coffer of the first level of this sector, named A1, measures 4.00 m in its lower part, whereas the rest of coffers measure as follows: A2, 3.90 m; A3, 3.94 m; A4, 3.86 m; A5, 3.83 m; A6, 3.86 m; A7, 3.85 m; A8, 3.92 m)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Based on the study of the North-East quadrant, the average distance between the lowest external points of the first level is 1.02 m, which becomes 0.67 between the upper external points of the last level.

    “Based on the study of the North-East quadrant, the average distance between the lowest external points of the first level is 1.02 m, which becomes 0.67 between the upper external points of the last level.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The differences between the second and the third level are greater than between the rest of the levels, so the transition seems not to be completely uniform.

    “Moreover, the differences between the second and the third level are greater than between the rest of the levels, so the transition seems not to be completely uniform.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The external lines of the coffer sectors appear to converge to the upper pole of the sphere but intersect before this point, reflecting some irregularities.

    “Another result regarding the general distribution is the analysis of the external lines of the coffer sectors, which appear to converge to the upper pole of the sphere but intersect before this point, reflecting some irregularities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The East transversal axis shows a distance from the centre of the sphere of approximately 16 cm and the West transversal axis has a slightly greater value.

    “The East transversal axis shows a distance from the centre of the sphere of approximately 16 cm and the West transversal axis has a slightly greater value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The distance from survey points to the ideal surface shows a 10 cm tolerance in 72.5% of the points, 21% under 15 cm, and 6.5% over this measure.

    “The data of the outcome show a 10 cm tolerance in 72.5% of the points, whereas 21% are under 15 cm, and 6.5% are over this measure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The external shape can be approximated as a square, but the inner levels have different proportions and change from horizontal to vertical rectangles.

    “The external shape can be approximated as a square, but the inner levels have different proportions and change from horizontal to vertical rectangles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The analysis of connecting planes makes it possible to identify the radial direction of the upper transition surfaces and the approximate convergence of the inferior transition surfaces to a point at a certain distance from the centre of the space.

    “The analysis of connecting planes makes it possible to identify the radial direction of the upper transition surfaces and the approximate convergence of the inferior transition surfaces to a point at a certain distance from the centre of the space.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This perspective view reproduces an almost square image, and the coffer surfaces seem to be regular and of the same dimensions.

    “It is evident that this perspective view reproduces an almost square image, and the coffer surfaces seem to be regular and of the same dimensions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The deviation from perfect orthogonality is 90° 50 0 between the East transversal axis and the longitudinal axis, and 90° 32 0 between the West transversal axis and the longitudinal axis.

    “The two parts show a minimum deviation from the perfect orthogonality: 90° 50 0 between the East transversal axis and the longitudinal axis; 90° 32 0 between the West transversal axis and the longitudinal axis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There is special evidence of the irregularity of the sector situated on the North-South axis and the consequent distribution of the sectors of the North-East quadrant.

    “We can state that the general layout of the 28 sectors of coffers is approximately uniform, but we must stress the special evidence of the irregularity of the sector situated on the North-South axis and the consequent distribution of the sectors of the North-East quadrant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Irregularities are highlighted, and the shape and general arrangement of the coffers is related to the spherical geometry of the soffit.

    “At the same time, irregularities are highlighted, and the shape and general arrangement of the coffers is related to the spherical geometry of the soffit.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The angles between vertical axes of the coffer sectors are extremely close to 12° 50 0, equivalent to the subdivision of the 360° ideal model into 28 equal parts.

    “The angles between vertical axes of the coffer sectors are extremely close to 12° 50 0 , which is equivalent to the subdivision of the 360° ideal model into 28 equal parts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A viewer can see a complete view of the coffers from the centre of the space: he can see all the lowest inner edges and many of the upper edges of the coffers from a circular zone at a certain distance from the centre.

    “We can confirm that a viewer can see a complete view of the coffers from the centre of the space: he can see all the lowest inner edges and many of the upper edges of the coffers from a circular zone at a certain distance from the centre, and he will have a reduced and changing vision of the interior of the coffers from the area next to the circular wall.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The point cloud generated from the centre of the room accurately represents the visual field from that point.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The lowest connecting planes in the first two levels of the coffers are larger than in the upper levels and the inner figure is thus a horizontal rectangle.

    “The lowest connecting planes in the first two levels of the coffers are larger than in the upper levels and the inner figure is thus a horizontal rectangle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Each coffer generates a different image when the inclination of the perspective axis moves, thus showing its trapezoidal shape.

    “Each coffer generates a different image when the inclination of the perspective axis moves, thus showing its trapezoidal shape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    By comparing different perspective views, it can be directly noted how the perception of these elements slowly changes.

    “By comparing different perspective views, it can be directly noted how the perception of these elements slowly changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    When calculating these values as arcs of a sphere, the average value is 0.84, with variations of a few centimetres between zones.

    “When calculating these values as arcs of a sphere, the average value is 0.84, with variations of a few centimetres between zones.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Coliseum shows a more pronounced gap in the orthogonal direction of the main axis.

    “For example, the Coliseum shows a more pronounced gap in the orthogonal direction of the main axis (Pelletti 1989: 15).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pelletti 1989: 15

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The coffers may have been slightly modified by the cladding restoration works of Terenzio (1933) in the 1930s and more recently of Belardi (2006), especially if we refer to the smallest surfaces.

    “They may have been slightly modified by the cladding restoration works of Terenzio (1933) in the 1930s and more recently of Belardi (2006), especially if we refer to the smallest surfaces.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Terenzio (1933)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Belardi (2006)
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The unique point cloud perfectly describes every part of the coffers and their complex surfaces without detecting any blind areas.

    “This unique point cloud perfectly describes every part of the coffers and their complex surfaces without detecting any blind areas.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The more complex design of the inner levels may be the result of two conditions: the vertical alignment of the coffers and the alteration of the lowest parts of the coffers to correct the perspective perception.

    “The more complex design of the inner levels may be the result of two conditions: the vertical alignment of the coffers and the alteration of the lowest parts of the coffers to correct the perspective perception.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The current state of the coffers, as registered by the point cloud, sufficiently reflects the original design of the coffers for the geometrical analyses.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A similar finding of an area of depression along the North-South axis was obtained by Scherer (2009).

    “A similar finding was obtained by Scherer (2009: 220-221).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scherer (2009: 220-221)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Waddell (2008) used measurements documented by Piranesi in the seventeenth century to formulate his hypothesis about the distribution of coffers.

    “For example, Waddell (2008) used measurements documented by Piranesi in the seventeenth century to formulate his hypothesis about the distribution of coffers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Waddell (2008)
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The division of a quarter of the circumference into 7 equal parts was a complicated geometric problem.

    “The division of a quarter of the circumference into 7 equal parts was a complicated geometric problem (Martines 1989).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martines 1989

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This change is probably a result of two conditions of coffer design: the aim to preserve the vertical alignment of the sector in the width of both the external and internal levels; and the need for greater alteration of the lowest coffers to control the perspective view from the centre of the room.

    “This change is probably a result of two conditions of coffer design: the aim to preserve the vertical alignment of the sector in the width of both the external and internal levels; and the need for greater alteration of the lowest coffers to control the perspective view from the centre of the room.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    This divergence from the average value was distributed evenly between the six sectors of the second quadrant in order to generate a uniform image of the soffit frame.

    “This divergence from the average value was distributed evenly between the six sectors of the second quadrant in order to generate a uniform image of the soffit frame.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These data affirm the accuracy of the vault to the ideal model and confirm the uniformity of the general distribution of the coffers.

    “These data provide new affirmation of the incredible accuracy of the vault to the ideal model, and also confirms the uniformity of the general distribution of the coffers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The use of contemporary methods of architectural survey assures the correct graphical documentation of the dome in its current state of conservation.

    “The use of contemporary methods of architectural survey assures the correct graphical documentation of the dome in its current state of conservation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This difference in width has an impact on the radial arrangement of the coffers and generates the divergence of the bisector registered by the comparison of the survey model and the ideal model.

    “This difference has an impact on the radial arrangement of the coffers and generates the divergence of the bisector that was registered by the comparison of the survey model and the ideal model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is unlikely that thermal oscillation affected the entire volume of concrete because the building's thermal inertia is very high due to the width of its walls and sections.

    “This situation seems unlikely due to the thermal inertia of the building, which is certainly very high because of the width of its walls and sections.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Creating the image of a pure shape, such as a square, is part of the search for regular forms present in the classical Roman culture.

    “Creating the image of a pure shape, such as a square, is part of the search for regular forms present in the classical Roman culture (Ferna ´ndez-Cabo 2013: 543).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ferna ´ndez-Cabo 2013: 543

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    The results are based on the current state of the coffers registered by the point cloud.

    “In studying this subject, we should consider that the results are based on the current state of the coffers registered by the point cloud.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The control of perspective correction was inexact and may not have been generated by a difficult process using a projection point.

    “The control of perspective correction was inexact and may not have been generated by a difficult process using a projection point.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In ancient times there was no knowledge of the perspective method or of spherical geometry.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The present research verifies the ambitious work of the Roman builders based on empirical knowledge of perception and geometry and carried out with the use of ancient tools.

    “The present research, performed with sophisticated devices and software, verifies the ambitious work of the Roman builders based on empirical knowledge of perception and geometry and carried out with the use of ancient tools.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The current state of the coffers, as registered by the point cloud, sufficiently reflects the original design of the coffers for the geometrical analyses.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This image of a square may be associated with the external shape of the coffers, while the inner levels show some differences.

    “This image of a square may be associated with the external shape of the coffers, while the inner levels show some differences (Fig. 14).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    From the point of view of construction, such a dependence would be very difficult to achieve due to the great distance and the height of the dome from the floor.

    “We consider that from the point of view of construction, such a dependence would be very difficult to achieve due to the great distance and the height of the dome from the floor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In ancient times there was no knowledge of the perspective method or of spherical geometry.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Roman constructors designed the external form of the coffers with a square proportion based on the near equivalence between the lowest edge and the vertical edge, adapting to the vertical alignment of the external lines.

    “Regarding the coffer shape, we propose the hypothesis that Roman constructors designed the external form of the coffers with a square proportion based on the near equivalence between the lowest edge and the vertical edge, adapting to the vertical alignment of the external lines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The current state of the coffers, as registered by the point cloud, sufficiently reflects the original design of the coffers for the geometrical analyses.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The division of the circumference into 28 equal parts might have been started or completed with the sector opposite the entry portal.

    “This detail may indicate that the division of the circumference into 28 equal parts might have been started or completed with this sector.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    The accuracy of the radial distribution of the coffers is surprising.

    “According to the calculations of the present study, the accuracy of the radial distribution of the coffers is surprising (Fig. 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
43 of 43
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The configuration of the coffers is governed by geometric-constructive laws that exist and can be defined.

    “The configuration of the coffers is governed by a complex design that is based on geometric-constructive laws yet to be defined.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The average coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete is 10^-5 °C^-1 and can vary by about ±30% depending on concrete composition and conditions.

    “Concrete expands, and the average coefficient of thermal expansion is 10 -5 °C -1 .Test results show that this coefficient can change in a relatively high proportion (on the order of ±30%) depending on the nature of the concrete, sand and gravel, dosage, hygrometry and dimensions of the sections.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Setting out on site was especially difficult at the location of the cornice of the vault.

    “Moreover, the setting out on site was especially difficult at the location of the cornice of the vault.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In ancient times there was no knowledge of the perspective method or of spherical geometry.

    “Furthermore, as far as we currently know, in ancient times there was no knowledge of the perspective method or of spherical geometry.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The current state of the coffers, as registered by the point cloud, sufficiently reflects the original design of the coffers for the geometrical analyses.

    “In studying this subject, we should consider that the results are based on the current state of the coffers registered by the point cloud.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The ideal model built from average measurements is a valid reference for analyzing the original design.

    “We used these studies on the average measurement of coffers and their distribution as a first metrical reference to build the complete ideal model.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The point cloud generated from the centre of the room accurately represents the visual field from that point.

    “This observation has been verified through the study of the point cloud generated from the centre of the room without considering scannings performed on the transversal and longitudinal axes.”
7 of 7

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Meridian rib retains about two-thirds, not half, of its width

    Minor

    The stated widths change from 1.02 m to 0.67 m. The latter is about 66% of the former, rather than almost half.

    Reported 0.5 · recomputed 0.656863

  • Slope directions are described as both uniformly northwest-southeast and northward

    Minor

    The text says all maximum-slope lines of the circumference planes run northwest-southeast, then says the upper circumference of the last coffer level slopes toward the north.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Graßhoff, Gerd, Michael Heinzelmann and Marcus Wäfler, eds. 2006. The Pantheon in Rome: Contributions to the conference (Bern, November 9–12, 2006). Bern: Bern Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science.
  2. Saalman, Howard. 1988. The Pantheon coffers: pattern and number. Architectura, Journal of the History of Architecture 18:121–122.
  3. Valenti, Graziano Maria. 2009. A computing model for the Pantheon’s cupola: from the discrete to the continuous. the ideal continuous model. The Pantheon in Rome. Contributions to the conference (Bern, November 9-12, 2006), Gerd Graßhoff, Michael Heinzelmann and Marcus Wäfler, eds. Bern: Bern Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, pp. 223–233.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aliberti, L., & Alonso-Rodríguez, M. Á.
Affiliations
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Aliberti, Licinia
Venue
Nexus Network Journal
Published
2017-04-25
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
363-382
ISSN
  • 1522-4600 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-5896
OpenAlex
W2608253481
Cited by
10
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
10.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Nexus Network Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi Roma Tre
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Architecture and Art History Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical and Architectural Studies
Keywords
Pantheon, coffers, domes, spherical surfaces, architectural geometry, Roman architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review