Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 765

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The electrical constants of a crustacean nerve fibre

Hodgkin, Alan Lloyd, Rushton, William Albert Hugh·1946·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences

Abstract

Theoretical equations are derived for the response of a nerve fibre to the sudden application of a weak current. The equations describe the behaviour of the nerve fibre in terms of the membrane resistance and capacity, the axoplasm resistance and the resistance of the external fluid. Expressions are given which allow these four constants to be calculated from experimental observations. Axons from Carcinus maenas were used in preliminary experiments. Quantitative determinations were made on a new single-fibre preparation—the 75μ diameter axon from the walking leg of the lobster (Homarus vulgaris). Currents with a strength of one-third to one-half threshold were used in the quantitative determinations. The behaviour of lobster axons agreed with theoretical predictions in the following respects: (a) the steady extrapolar potential declined exponentially with distance; (b) the voltage gradient midway between two distant electrodes was uniform; (c) the rise and fall of the extrapolar potential at different distances conformed to the correct theoretical curves. The extrapolar potential disappeared when the axon was treated with a solution of chloroform, indicating that the surface membrane was destroyed by this treatment, and that the potential recorded was in fact derived from the membrane. The ratio of the internal to external resistance per unit length was found to be about 0⋅7. The absolute magnitude of the action potential at the surface membrane was estimated at about 110 mV. The specific resistance of the axoplasm had an average value of 60Ω cm., which was roughly three times that of the surrounding sea water. The calculated resistance of one square centimetre of membrane was found to vary from 600 to 7000Ω in thirteen experiments. The membrane capacity was of the order of 1⋅3μF cm.-2. No trace of inductive behaviour could be observed in the majority of the experiments. But three axons with low membrane resistances showed effects which could be attributed either to inductance or to a small local response. The absence of inductive behaviour in axons with high membrane resistance does not prove the absence of an inductive element. Currents with a strength several times greater than threshold often produced oscillating potentials at the cathode. A local response was always observed when the strength of current approached threshold. The response had a striking inflected form if the current strength was near threshold and its duration less than the utilization time. Indirect evidence indicates that the membrane resistance falls to a low value during activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.1946.0024

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 765

Metadata

Authors
Hodgkin, A. L., & Rushton, W. A. H.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences
Published
1946-12-03
Volume
133
Issue
873
Pages
444-479
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9193
OpenAlex
W1965363502
Cited by
765
References
0
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The electrical constants of a crustacean nerve fibre. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1946.0024
The paper
Hodgkin, A. L., & Rushton, W. A. H. (1946). The electrical constants of a crustacean nerve fibre. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1946.0024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.