Cited by 24Neural Networks and ApplicationsEmbodied and Extended CognitionNeural dynamics and brain function

A survey on neuro-mimetic deep learning via predictive coding

Open access
Salvatori, Tommaso, Mali, Ankur, Buckley, Christopher L., Lukasiewicz, Thomas, Rao, Rajesh P.N., Friston, Karl, Ororbia, Alexander·2026·Neural Networks

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming one of the key technologies of this century. The majority of results in AI thus far have been achieved using deep neural networks trained with a learning algorithm called error backpropagation, always considered biologically implausible. To this end, recent works have studied learning algorithms for deep neural networks inspired by the neurosciences. One such theory, called predictive coding (PC), has shown promising properties that make it potentially valuable for the machine learning community: it can model information processing in different areas of the brain, can be used in control and robotics, has a solid mathematical foundation in variational inference, and performs its computations asynchronously. Inspired by such properties, works that propose novel PC-like algorithms are starting to be present in multiple sub-fields of machine learning and AI at large. Here, we survey such efforts by first providing a broad overview of the history of PC to provide common ground for the understanding of the recent developments, then by describing current efforts and results, and concluding with a large discussion of possible implications and ways forward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neunet.2025.108161

Cites

161 of 161 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salvatori, T., Mali, A., Buckley, C. L., Lukasiewicz, T., Rao, R. P. N., Friston, K., & Ororbia, A.
Affiliations
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Salvatori, Tommaso
Venue
Neural Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-03
Volume
195
Pages
108161
ISSN
0893-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415019933
Cited by
2
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neural Networks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Alan Turing Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
predictive coding, backpropagation, variational inference, asynchronous computation
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review