The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genotype—environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
We have studied the relative fitnesses of three genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster in 50 environments. Two genotypes, the MA lines, had accumulated mutations in the absence of natural selection over 62 generations. The third was a related strain where selection had continued to act. The environments differed in three factors: parental density, dilution of the medium, and the temperature régime and medium composition. Our measure of fitness assessed fecundity and viability relative to a reference genotype. Both MA lines always had lower fitnesses than the selected line, but the difference increased dramatically with dilution of the medium and, especially, crowding. Under the most severe conditions, the performance of the MA lines approached 0. This increased difference in harsh conditions may be caused both by a uniform increase in the magnitude of deleterious effects of all mutations and by the exposure of mutations which are essentially neutral under benign conditions. If the second cause is important, previous experiments are likely to have underestimated the genomic deleterious mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster more than previously thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drake, J. W., Charlesworth, B., Charlesworth, D., & Crow, J. F. (1998) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667 · Cited by 1,932
Uncovering cryptic genetic variation
Gibson, G., & Dworkin, I. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1426 · Cited by 546
Environmental Stress as an Evolutionary Force
HOFFMANN, A. A., & HERCUS, M. J. (2000) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0217:esaaef]2.3.co;2 · Cited by 382
Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us?
Harshman, L. G., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01756-5 · Cited by 256
Role of selection in fixation of gene duplications
Kondrashov, F. A., & Kondrashov, A. S. (2006) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.033 · Cited by 195
Self-citation
Metadata
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1994-12-22
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 1353
- Pages
- 221-227
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2139228351
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genotype—environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1994.0166
- The paper
- Genotype—environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. (1994). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0166
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.