The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mapping variations in the strength and breadth of biogeographic transition zones using species turnover
Abstract
Biogeographic regions are widely regarded as real entities, or at least as useful summaries of the complex patterns of spatial concordance among species. The problem is that, whereas some parts of the transition zones between regions may be strong and abrupt, other parts of the same zones may be weak or broad, so that the corresponding parts of border lines drawn on maps, although convenient, are arbitrary constructs. One approach to investigating transition zones ascribes values to the area units themselves, by quantifying the spatial turnover among species within the surrounding neighbourhoods of areas on maps. Using data for bumble bee distributions world-wide, I show that quantitative measures of neighbourhood turnover can discover many of the transition zones that are found by classification techniques when applied to the same data. But unlike classification techniques, turnover measures, particularly when used in combination, can show how a transition zone varies along its length, not only in its strength (the proportion of species contributing to the zone) but also in its breadth (the degree of spatial overlap or the degree of coincidence among species replacements across it). For bumble bees at least, these transition zones are also negatively associated with areas that have a combination of both high species richness and high species nestedness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data
Koleff, P., Gaston, K. J., & Lennon, J. J. (2003) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00710.x · Cited by 1,736
Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity
Legendre, P. (2014) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12207 · Cited by 1,115
The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness
Baselga, A. (2012) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00756.x · Cited by 936
A framework for delineating biogeographical regions based on species distributions
Kreft, H., & Jetz, W. (2010) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02375.x · Cited by 743
Mapping Spatial Pattern in Biodiversity for Regional Conservation Planning: Where to from Here?
Ferrier, S. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150252899806 · Cited by 707
Metadata
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1996-05-22
- Volume
- 263
- Issue
- 1370
- Pages
- 579-588
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2068980730
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mapping variations in the strength and breadth of biogeographic transition zones using species turnover. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1996.0087
- The paper
- Mapping variations in the strength and breadth of biogeographic transition zones using species turnover. (1996). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.