The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The evolution of polyandry II: post–copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility
Open accessAbstract
Fundamental to the recently–proposed hypothesis that females mate with more than one male as a hedge against genetic incompatibility is the premise that mechanisms are available to polyandrous females which enable them to safeguard their reproductive investment against the threat of incompatibility between maternal and paternal genomes. Accumulation of sperm from several males shifts the arena for sexual selection from the external environment to the female reproductive tract where, we suggest, interactions at the molecular and cellular levels provide females with direct mechanisms for assessing genetic compatibility. We present examples from the literature to illustrate how sperm competition and female choice of sperm can enable polyandrous females to minimize the risk of fertilization by genetically–incompatible sperm. Polyandry and multiple paternity also create the opportunity to reduce the cost of genetic incompatibility by reallocation of maternal resources from defective to viable offspring. This is likely to be a critically important post–copulatory mechanism for viviparous females whose intimate immunological relationship with developing embryos makes them particularly vulnerable to genetic incompatibility arising from intragenomic conflict and other processes acting at the suborganismal level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects
Arnqvist, G., & Nilsson, T. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1446 · Cited by 1,545
Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review
Tregenza, T., & Wedell, N. (2000) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x · Cited by 958
The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0250 · Cited by 657
Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits
JENNIONS, M. D., & PETRIE, M. (2000) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1999.tb00040.x · Cited by 554
CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE: CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING FEMALE SPERM CHOICE
Birkhead, T. R. (1998) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01848.x · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeh, J. A., & Zeh, D. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1997-01-22
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 1378
- Pages
- 69-75
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2141173843
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of polyandry II: post–copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1997.0010
- The paper
- Zeh, J. A., & Zeh, D. W. (1997). The evolution of polyandry II: post–copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1997.0010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.