The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cost of resistance: relationship between reduced fertility and increased resistance in a snail—schistosome host—parasite system
Open accessAbstract
Natural host populations often exhibit genetic variability in resistance to parasitism. One possible mechanism for maintaining such diversity is a trade–off between fitness costs associated with resistance and fitness costs associated with parasitism. However, little is known about the nature or magnitude of these costs in animal populations. Using artificial selection experiments in a Biomphalaria glabrata–Schistosoma mansoni host–parasite system, we demonstrated that resistance and susceptibility to infection are heritable. We then investigated whether resistance had any associated costs in terms of snail reproductive success. Susceptible–selected snail lines showed significantly higher fertility (number of offspring produced) than resistant–selected or unselected control snail lines, irrespective of current infection status. There were no consistent differences between snail lines in fecundity, proportion of abnormal egg masses produced, or mean number of eggs per egg mass. Mortality rate was higher among infected than uninfected snails. These results are consistent with snails incurring costs of resistance to schistosome infection in the absence of the parasite.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts
Woolhouse, M. E. J., Webster, J. P., Domingo, E., Charlesworth, B., & Levin, B. R. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1202-569 · Cited by 869
Self-citationVariation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology
Schmid-Hempel, P. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2265 · Cited by 722
Assessing the Cost of Mounting an Immune Response
Bonneaud, C., Mazuc, J., Gonzalez, G., Haussy, C., Chastel, O., Faivre, B., & Sorci, G. (2003) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/346134 · Cited by 566
Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity
Altizer, S., Harvell, D., & Friedle, E. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.013 · Cited by 532
Bateman's principle and immunity
Rolff, J. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.1959 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, J. P., & Woolhouse, M. E. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1999-02-22
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 1417
- Pages
- 391-396
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2143293000
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost of resistance: relationship between reduced fertility and increased resistance in a snail—schistosome host—parasite system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1999.0650
- The paper
- Webster, J. P., & Woolhouse, M. E. J. (1999). Cost of resistance: relationship between reduced fertility and increased resistance in a snail—schistosome host—parasite system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0650
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.