The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sex-ratio-distorting Wolbachia causes sex-role reversal in its butterfly host
Open accessAbstract
Sex-role-reversed mating systems in which females compete for males and males may be choosy are usually associated with males investing more than females in offspring. We report that sex-role reversal may also be caused by selfish genetic elements which distort the sex ratio towards females. Some populations of the butterflies Acraea encedon and Acraea encedana are extremely female biased because over 90% of females are infected with a Wolbachia bacterium that is maternally inherited and kills male embryos. Many females in these populations are virgins suggesting that their reproductive success may be limited by access to males. These females form lekking swarms at landmarks in which females exhibit behaviours which we interpret as functioning to solicit matings from males. The hypothesis that female A. encedon swarm in order to mate is supported by the finding that, in release recapture experiments, mated females tend to leave the swarm while unmated females remained. This behaviour is a sex-role-reversed form of a common mating system in insects in which males form lekking swarms at landmarks and compete for females. Female lekking swarms are absent from less female-biased populations and here the butterflies are instead associated with resources in the form of the larval food plant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The incomplete natural history of mitochondria
Ballard, J. W. O., & Whitlock, M. C. (2004) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.02063.x · Cited by 2,289
The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence
BONDURIANSKY, R. (2001) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793101005693 · Cited by 1,018
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios
KOKKO, H., & JENNIONS, M. D. (2008) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x · Cited by 982
Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review
Tregenza, T., & Wedell, N. (2000) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x · Cited by 958
Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems
Kokko, H., & Rankin, D. J. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1784 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiggins, F. M., Hurst, G. D. D., & Majerus, M. E. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2000-01-07
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 1438
- Pages
- 69-73
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2042260095
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex-ratio-distorting Wolbachia causes sex-role reversal in its butterfly host. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2000.0968
- The paper
- Jiggins, F. M., Hurst, G. D. D., & Majerus, M. E. N. (2000). Sex-ratio-distorting Wolbachia causes sex-role reversal in its butterfly host. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.0968
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.