The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model
Open accessAbstract
A social group can only be spatially coherent if its members synchronize activities such as foraging and resting. However, activity synchronization is costly to individuals if it requires them to postpone an activity that would be personally more profitable in order to do what the rest of the group is doing. Such costs will be particularly high in groups whose members belong to different age, size or sex classes since the optimal allocation of time to various activities is likely to differ between such classes. Thus, differences in the costs of activity synchronization between and within classes could cause non-homogenous groups to be less stable than homogenous groups, with the result that homogenous groups predominate in the population: that is, they could cause 'social segregation' of animals of different sex, size or age. We develop a model that predicts the degree of social segregation attributable to differences in activity synchronization between homogenous and non-homogenous groups and use this model in determining whether activity synchronization can explain intersexual social segregation in red deer (Cervus elaphus). Differences in activity synchronization between mixed-sex and unisex groups of red deer explained 35% of the observed degree of intersexual social segregation, showing that activity synchronization is an important cause of social segregation in this species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution of Social Behavior
Alexander, R. D. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 · Cited by 3,854
Hamilton, W. D. (1971) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(71)90189-5 · Cited by 3,506
Red Deer. Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes
Watson, A., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E., & Albon, S. D. (1983) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4471 · Cited by 2,460
The evolutionary advantages of group foraging
Clark, C. W., & Mangel, M. (1986) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(86)90024-9 · Cited by 636
Sexual selection, social competition and evolution
West‐Eberhard, M. J. (1979) · Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) · Cited by 591
Fennessy, P. F. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.1984.10426307 · Cited by 528
Foraging behaviour and sexual segregation in bighorn sheep
RUCKSTUHL, K. E. (1998) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0745 · Cited by 301
Spontaneous meal patterns of humans: influence of the presence of other people
de Castro, J. M., & de Castro, E. S. (1989) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/50.2.237 · Cited by 279
Clayton, D. A. (1978) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/410789 · Cited by 275
CLUTTON‐BROCK, T. H., IASON, G. R., & GUINNESS, F. E. (1987) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb01534.x · Cited by 264
Cited by
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Consensus decision making in animals
Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008 · Cited by 872
Self-citationGroup decision-making in animals
Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01294 · Cited by 529
Self-citationA framework for studying social complexity
Kappeler, P. M. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-018-2601-8 · Cited by 316
Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony Predicts Group Cohesion
Tomashin, A., Gordon, I., & Wallot, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.903407 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2000-11-07
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 1458
- Pages
- 2213-2218
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2085188541
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2000.1271
- The paper
- Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2000). Activity synchrony and social cohesion: a fission-fusion model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1271
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.