The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive innate immunity? Responsive-mode prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle,Tenebrio molitor
Open accessAbstract
A primary infection by a parasite may indicate a higher risk of being reinfected in the near future (since infection may indicate that enemies are becoming more abundant). Acquired immunity does not exist in invertebrates despite the fact that they also face increased risks of reinfection following primary exposure. However, when subjected to immune insult, insects can produce immune responses that persist for long enough to provide prophylaxis. Because these immune responses are costly, persistence must be maintained through a selective advantage. We tested for the possibility that these long-lasting immune responses provided increased resistance to later infections by experimentally mimicking a primary immune insult (pre-challenge) in larvae of the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor, with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) prior to early or late exposure to spores of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. We found that pre-challenged larvae produced a long-lasting antimicrobial response, which provided a survival benefit when the larvae were exposed to fungal infection. These results suggest that the observed response is functionally "adaptive".
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An ancient system of host defense
Medzhitov, R., & Janeway, C. A. (1998) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0952-7915(98)80024-1 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Insect immunology and hematopoiesis
Hillyer, J. F. (2016) · Developmental & Comparative Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.dci.2015.12.006 · Cited by 561
Dong, Y., Taylor, H. E., & Dimopoulos, G. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040229 · Cited by 465
Insect Immunity Shows Specificity in Protection upon Secondary Pathogen Exposure
Sadd, B. M., & Schmid-Hempel, P. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.047 · Cited by 450
Trained Immunity: Reprogramming Innate Immunity in Health and Disease
Bekkering, S., Domínguez-Andrés, J., Joosten, L. A. B., Riksen, N. P., & Netea, M. G. (2021) · Annual Review of Immunology · doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-102119-073855 · Cited by 341
Invertebrate immunity and the limits of mechanistic immunology
Little, T. J., Hultmark, D., & Read, A. F. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1219 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Moret, Y., & Siva-Jothy, M. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2003-12-07
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 1532
- Pages
- 2475-2480
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2016414250
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive innate immunity? Responsive-mode prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle,Tenebrio molitor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2003.2511
- The paper
- Moret, Y., & Siva-Jothy, M. T. (2003). Adaptive innate immunity? Responsive-mode prophylaxis in the mealworm beetle,Tenebrio molitor. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.