Cited by 625Animal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?

Open access
Cotton, Samuel, Fowler, Kevin, Pomiankowski, Andrew·2004·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The handicap hypothesis of sexual selection predicts that sexual ornaments have evolved heightened condition-dependent expression. The prediction has only recently been subject to experimental investigation. Many of the experiments are of limited value as they: (i) fail to compare condition dependence in sexual ornaments with suitable non-sexual trait controls; (ii) do not adequately account for body size variation; and (iii) typically consider no stress and extreme stress manipulations rather than a range of stresses similar to those experienced in nature. There is also a dearth of experimental studies investigating the genetic basis of condition dependence. Despite the common claim that sexual ornaments are condition-dependent, the unexpected conclusion from our literature review is that there is little support from well-designed experiments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2004.2688

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most previous studies focused on early environmental conditions without taking genetic factors into account.

    “most previous studies have solely focused on the effects of early environmental conditions on ornament expression and/or mate choice, without taking genetic factors into account [4].”

    From ‘Out of tune’: consequences of inbreeding on bird song (2016) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Abstract says there is a dearth of experimental studies on the genetic basis of condition dependence, supporting the claim that genetic factors have often been neglected. It does not say that most previous studies focused solely on early environmental conditions, or establish the same pattern for mate choice. The indexed copy provides no substantive body text beyond the Abstract and references. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Baker R. H., Wilkinson G. S. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution. 2001 Jul;55(7):1373–1385. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. Blount Jonathan D., Metcalfe Neil B., Arnold Kathryn E., Surai Peter F., Devevey Godefroy L., Monaghan Pat. Neonatal nutrition, adult antioxidant defences and sexual attractiveness in the zebra finch. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 22;270(1525):1691–1696. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  3. Blount Jonathan D., Metcalfe Neil B., Birkhead Tim R., Surai Peter F. Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. Science. 2003 Apr 4;300(5616):125–127. doi: 10.1126/science.1082142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. Buchanan K. L., Spencer K. A., Goldsmith A. R., Catchpole C. K. Song as an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 7;270(1520):1149–1156. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. Candolin U. Increased signalling effort when survival prospects decrease: male-male competition ensures honesty. Anim Behav. 2000 Oct;60(4):417–422. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  6. Candolin U. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim Behav. 1999 Dec;58(6):1261–1267. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  7. David P., Bjorksten T., Fowler K., Pomiankowski A. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature. 2000 Jul 13;406(6792):186–188. doi: 10.1038/35018079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  8. Grafen A. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):473–516. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  9. Grether G. F. Carotenoid limitation and mate preference evolution: a test of the indicator hypothesis in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1712–1724. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. Griffith S. C. A trade-off between reproduction and a condition-dependent sexually selected ornament in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jun 7;267(1448):1115–1119. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  11. Henderson L., Jones E., Freemantle M., Howard C. A., Jenkinson P., Lambert R., Mackay J., Marshall R., Wilcox P. Extended harvest times are not necessary for the detection of in vitro clastogens in regulatory cytogenetics studies. Mutagenesis. 1996 Jan;11(1):61–67. doi: 10.1093/mutage/11.1.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  12. Houde A. E., Endler J. A. Correlated Evolution of Female Mating Preferences and Male Color Patterns in the Guppy Poecilia reticulata. Science. 1990 Jun 15;248(4961):1405–1408. doi: 10.1126/science.248.4961.1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  13. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A. Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J Theor Biol. 1999 Sep 7;200(1):97–109. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  15. Jennions M. D., Møller A. P., Petrie M. Sexually selected traits and adult survival: a meta-analysis. Q Rev Biol. 2001 Mar;76(1):3–36. doi: 10.1086/393743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  16. Jia F. Y., Greenfield M. D., Collins R. D. Genetic variance of sexually selected traits in waxmoths: maintenance by genotype x environment interaction. Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):953–967. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00095.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. Johnstone R. A. Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995 Feb;70(1):1–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01439.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  18. McGraw K. J., Hill G. E. Differential effects of endoparasitism on the expression of carotenoid- and melanin-based ornamental coloration. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 7;267(1452):1525–1531. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  19. McGraw Kevin J., Mackillop Emiko A., Dale James, Hauber Mark E. Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. J Exp Biol. 2002 Dec;205(Pt 23):3747–3755. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.23.3747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  20. Moczek AP, Emlen DJ. Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):459–466. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  21. Ohlsson Thomas, Smith Henrik G., Råberg Lars, Hasselquist Dennis. Pheasant sexual ornaments reflect nutritional conditions during early growth. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jan 7;269(1486):21–27. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar] doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  22. Scheuber Hannes, Jacot Alain, Brinkhof Martin W. G. The effect of past condition on a multicomponent sexual signal. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1779–1784. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  23. Wagner WE, Hoback WW. Nutritional effects on male calling behaviour in the variable field cricket. Anim Behav. 1999 Jan;57(1):89–95. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  24. Wagner WE, Jr, Reiser MG. The importance of calling song and courtship song in female mate choice in the variable field cricket. Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1219–1226. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cotton, S., Fowler, K., & Pomiankowski, A.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Collegium Budapest (HU)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2004-04-22
Volume
271
Issue
1541
Pages
771-783
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2037339481
Cited by
625
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 27
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
sexual ornaments, handicap hypothesis, sexual selection, body size variation
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Constitution, Biological Evolution, Female, Male, Selection, Genetic, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review