Cited by 454Animal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorMorphological variations and asymmetry

A Mechanism of Extreme Growth and Reliable Signaling in Sexually Selected Ornaments and Weapons

Emlen, Douglas J., Warren, Ian A., Johns, Annika, Dworkin, Ian, Lavine, Laura Corley·2012·Science

Abstract

Truthful Embellishments: Exaggerated ornaments such as beetle horns, deer antlers, and extreme tail lengths in birds are typically assumed to be subject to sexual selection because they signal the quality of an individual's breeding status—but how? Emlen et al. (p. 860 , published online 26 July) present a general mechanistic model for the evolution of exaggerated traits, proposing that sensitivity to the insulin response pathway can explain variation among individuals. The exaggerated size of such ornaments and their increased variability between individuals are a result of sexual selection for traits that are honest signals of the fitness of the individual.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1224286

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results focus entirely on the costs associated with locomotion; numerous other costs related to sexual selection may be incurred, and for peacocks these may lie in the development of the trait and in its display rather than the inherent cost of moving around with the trait.

    “It is important to stress that our results focus entirely on the costs associated with locomotion, there are of course numerous other costs related to sexual selection that may be incurred, indeed for peacocks these may lie in the development of the trait and in its display4344 rather than the inherent cost of moving around with the trait.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Emlen, D. J., Warren, I. A., Johns, A., Dworkin, I., & Lavine, L. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Montana (US)
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Emlen, Douglas J.
Venue
Science
Published
2012-08-17
Volume
337
Issue
6096
Pages
860-864
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1966661268
Cited by
454
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 8
FWCI
39.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
sexual selection, weapons, insulin/IGF-1 signaling, condition-dependent signaling, male quality, growth mechanism, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Animals, Coleoptera, Horns, Insulin, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Receptor, Insulin, Somatomedins, Signal Transduction, Mating Preference, Animal, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review