The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments
Open accessAbstract
In theory, natural selection can drive adaptation within species while simultaneously promoting the formation of new species by causing the evolution of reproductive isolation. Cryptic coloration is widespread in nature and is generally considered to be a clear visual example of adaptation. I provide evidence that population divergence in cryptic coloration can also cause reproductive isolation. First, a manipulative field experiment using walking-stick insects demonstrates that the relative survival of different colour-pattern morphs depends on the host-plant species on which they are resting, but only in the presence of avian predation. Second, natural populations adapted to different host plants have diverged in colour-pattern-morph frequencies such that between-host migrants are more likely to be the locally less-cryptic morph than are residents. Collectively, these data indicate that high rates of visual predation on less-cryptic migrants are likely to reduce encounters, and thus interbreeding, between host-associated populations. Comparison with previous estimates of sexual isolation reveals that the contribution of selection against between-host migrants to total premating isolation is as strong as, or stronger than, that of sexual isolation. These findings highlight the potential role of natural selection against migrants between divergent environments in the formation of new species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Cited by
Limits to evolution at range margins: when and why does adaptation fail?
Bridle, J. R., & Vines, T. H. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.002 · Cited by 676
Nosil, P., Egan, S. P., & Funk, D. J. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00299.x · Cited by 600
Self-citationLinking color polymorphism maintenance and speciation
Gray, S. M., & McKinnon, J. S. (2007) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.005 · Cited by 593
Nosil, P., Vines, T. H., & Funk, D. J. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1554/04-428 · Cited by 586
Self-citationExperimental evidence that predation promotes divergence in adaptive radiation
Nosil, P., & Crespi, B. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601575103 · Cited by 278
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nosil, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2004-07-22
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 1547
- Pages
- 1521-1528
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2167767101
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2004.2751
- The paper
- Nosil, P. (2004). Reproductive isolation caused by visual predation on migrants between divergent environments. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.