The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential for female kin associations in wild western gorillas despite female dispersal
Abstract
Female philopatry and male dispersal are the norm for most mammals, and females that remain in their natal region often derive foraging or social benefits from proximity to female kin. However, other factors, such as constraints on group size or a shortage of potential mates, may promote female dispersal even when female kin associations would be beneficial. In these cases, female kin associations might develop, not through female philopatry, but through female emigration to the same group. To date, little attention has been focused on the potential for kin-biased behaviour between females in female-dispersing species. Here we investigate the genetic relationships among adults in eight wild groups of unhabituated western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) at the Mondika Research Center using microsatellite genotyping of DNA collected from hair and faeces. We found that almost half (40%) of adult females had an adult female relative in the same group and average within-group relatedness among females was significantly higher than that expected under a model of random dispersal. This provides the first genetic evidence that females can maintain social associations with female relatives in spite of routine natal and secondary dispersal. In addition, we show that females appear to avoid related silverback males when making dispersal decisions, suggesting that a strategy of non-random female dispersal may also function to avoid inbreeding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Western lowland gorillas commonly live in polygynous groups with a single silverback”
From Allostatic load and biological anthropology (2017) · cites this paper as Bradley, Doran-Sheehy, & Vigilant, 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dispersal, nepotism, and primate social behavior
Moore, J. (1992) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/bf02547823 · Cited by 134 · cited 1×
“It is generally assumed that the dispersing sex has limited, if any, opportunities to develop kin-biased relationships (Moore 1992; Hoelzer et al. 2004).”
Research works printed but not linked: 54
- 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5797 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00225-8 · DOI
- 10.1159/000073428 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.062 · DOI
- 10.1086/284142 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511542312.006 · DOI
- Crockett C.M, 1984, Infanticide: comparative and evolutionary perspectives, 173
- 10.1534/genetics.106.057331 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1998.0267 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.20075 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03286.x · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.20045 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00664.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0003-3472(80)80103-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1978.tb00267.x · DOI
- Hoelzer G.A, 2004, Kinship and behaviour in primates, 109, 10.1093/oso/9780195148893.003.0005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.04.015 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1015524931226 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1023784213317 · DOI
- Lehmann J, 2007, Sex differences in sociality, Int. J. Primatol
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02560.x · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1999)48:1<1::AID-AJP1>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1021126920753 · DOI
- 10.1038/294160a0 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853994X00514 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.05.012 · DOI
- 10.1038/351562a0 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.1074 · DOI
- Pusey A, 1979, The great apes, 465
- Pusey A.E, 1987, Primate societies, 250
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04226.x · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.20069 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02373959 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1015581016205 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1088580 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2002.2277 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.1350250104 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853994X00550 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)42:3<179::AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
- 10.1007/s002650050390 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.20074 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00265-003-0630-3 · DOI
- Sugiyama Y, 1976, Advances in the study of behavior, 255
- 10.1007/BF02547825 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.020 · DOI
- 10.1163/15685390152032505 · DOI
- van Schaik C.P, 1989, Comparative socioecology: the behavioural ecology of humans and other mammals, 195
- 10.1007/BF00299705 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01185.x · DOI · Paper page
- Waser N.M, 1993, The natural history of inbreeding and outbreeding, 1
- 10.1007/BF02193694 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.1350320103 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.241210198 · DOI
- 10.1163/156853980X00447 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Allostatic load and biological anthropology
Edes, A. N., & Crews, D. E. (2017) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23146 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Bradley, B. J., Doran-Sheehy, D. M., & Vigilant, L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Zoology, University of CambridgeCambridge CB2 3EJ, UK
- Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook UniversityStony Brook, NY 11794-4364, USA
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6Leipzig 04103, Germany
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2007-07-03
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 1622
- Pages
- 2179-2185
- ISSN
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review